Literature DB >> 15306362

Sexual imprinting in human mate choice.

Tamas Bereczkei1, Petra Gyuris, Glenn E Weisfeld.   

Abstract

Animal and human studies have shown that individuals choose mates partly on the basis of similarity, a tendency referred to as homogamy. Several authors have suggested that a specific innate recognition mechanism, phenotypic matching, allows the organism to detect similar others by their resemblance to itself. However, several objections have been raised to this theory on both empirical and theoretical grounds. Here, we report that homogamy in humans is attained partly by sexual imprinting on the opposite-sex parent during childhood. We hypothesized that children fashion a mental model of their opposite-sex parent's phenotype that is used as a template for acquiring mates. To disentangle the effects of phenotypic matching and sexual imprinting, adopted daughters and their rearing families were examined. Judges found significant resemblance on facial traits between daughter's husband and her adoptive father. Furthermore, this effect may be modified by the quality of the father-daughter relationship during childhood. Daughters who received more emotional support from their adoptive father were more likely to choose mates similar to the father than those whose father provided a less positive emotional atmosphere.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15306362      PMCID: PMC1691703          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2003.2672

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  11 in total

1.  AN EFFECT OF IMPRINTING ON THE PERCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT OF DOMESTIC CHICKS.

Authors:  P P BATESON
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1964-04-25       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Resources, attractiveness, family commitment; reproductive decisions in human mate choice.

Authors:  T Bereczkei; S Voros; A Gal; L Bernath
Journal:  Ethology       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 1.897

Review 3.  Childhood experience, interpersonal development, and reproductive strategy: and evolutionary theory of socialization.

Authors:  J Belsky; L Steinberg; P Draper
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  1991-08

4.  Whose baby are you?

Authors:  N J Christenfeld; E A Hill
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1995-12-14       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Mothers determine sexual preferences.

Authors:  K M Kendrick; M R Hinton; K Atkins; M A Haupt; J D Skinner
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1998-09-17       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 6.  Hookworm infection.

Authors:  P J Hotez; D I Pritchard
Journal:  Sci Am       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 2.142

7.  Odor signatures and kin recognition.

Authors:  R H Porter; J M Cernoch; R D Balogh
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1985-03

8.  Paternally inherited HLA alleles are associated with women's choice of male odor.

Authors:  Suma Jacob; Martha K McClintock; Bethanne Zelano; Carole Ober
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2002-01-22       Impact factor: 38.330

9.  Body odour preferences in men and women: do they aim for specific MHC combinations or simply heterozygosity?

Authors:  C Wedekind; S Füri
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1997-10-22       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Possible olfaction-based mechanisms in human kin recognition and inbreeding avoidance.

Authors:  Glenn E Weisfeld; Tiffany Czilli; Krista A Phillips; James A Gall; Cary M Lichtman
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2003-07
View more
  25 in total

1.  Human homogamy in facial characteristics: does a sexual-imprinting-like mechanism play a role?

Authors:  Saori Nojo; Satoshi Tamura; Yasuo Ihara
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2012-09

Review 2.  Facial attractiveness: evolutionary based research.

Authors:  Anthony C Little; Benedict C Jones; Lisa M DeBruine
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-06-12       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Consistency between individuals' past and current romantic partners' own reports of their personalities.

Authors:  Yoobin Park; Geoff MacDonald
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-06-10       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Effects of stress on human mating preferences: stressed individuals prefer dissimilar mates.

Authors:  Johanna Lass-Hennemann; Christian E Deuter; Linn K Kuehl; André Schulz; Terry D Blumenthal; Hartmut Schachinger
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-03-10       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  MHC-assortative facial preferences in humans.

Authors:  S Craig Roberts; Anthony C Little; L Morris Gosling; Benedict C Jones; David I Perrett; Vaughan Carter; Marion Petrie
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2005-12-22       Impact factor: 3.703

6.  Facialmetric similarities mediate mate choice: sexual imprinting on opposite-sex parents.

Authors:  Tamas Bereczkei; Gabor Hegedus; Gabor Hajnal
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Human ability to detect kinship in strangers' faces: effects of the degree of relatedness.

Authors:  Gwenaël Kaminski; Slimane Dridi; Christian Graff; Edouard Gentaz
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-06-17       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Human kin recognition is self- rather than family-referential.

Authors:  Paola Bressan; Guendalina Zucchi
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2009-02-25       Impact factor: 3.703

Review 9.  Olfaction scaffolds the developing human from neonate to adolescent and beyond.

Authors:  Benoist Schaal; Tamsin K Saxton; Hélène Loos; Robert Soussignan; Karine Durand
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-04-20       Impact factor: 6.237

10.  Heritability of and early environment effects on variation in mating preferences.

Authors:  Holger Schielzeth; Elisabeth Bolund; Wolfgang Forstmeier
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2009-11-06       Impact factor: 3.694

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.