Literature DB >> 17148114

The interplay of positive and negative species interactions across an environmental gradient: insights from an individual-based simulation model.

J M J Travis1, R W Brooker, C Dytham.   

Abstract

Positive interspecific interactions are commonplace, and in recent years ecologists have begun to realize how important they can be in determining community and ecosystem dynamics. It has been predicted that net positive interactions are likely to occur in environments characterized by high abiotic stress. Although empirical field studies have started to support these predictions, little theoretical work has been carried out on the dynamic nature of these effects and their consequences for community structure. We use a simple patch-occupancy model to simulate the dynamics of a pair of species living on an environmental gradient. Each of the species can exist as either a mutualist or a cheater. The results confirm the prediction: a band of mutualists tends to occur in environmental conditions beyond the limits of the cheaters. The region between mutualists and cheaters is interesting: population density here is low. Mutualists periodically occupy this area, but are displaced by cheaters, who themselves go extinct in the absence of the mutualists. Furthermore, the existence of mutualists extends the area occupied by the cheaters, essentially increasing their realized niche. Our approach has considerable potential for improving our understanding of the balance between positive and negative interspecific interactions and for predicting the probable impacts of habitat loss and climate change on communities dominated by positive interspecific interactions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 17148114      PMCID: PMC1629044          DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2004.0236

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Lett        ISSN: 1744-9561            Impact factor:   3.703


  7 in total

1.  Positive interactions among alpine plants increase with stress.

Authors:  Ragan M Callaway; R W Brooker; Philippe Choler; Zaal Kikvidze; Christopher J Lortie; Richard Michalet; Leonardo Paolini; Francisco I Pugnaire; Beth Newingham; Erik T Aschehoug; Cristina Armas; David Kikodze; Bradley J Cook
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-06-20       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Evolution of mutualism through spatial effects.

Authors:  Norio Yamamura; Masahiko Higashi; Narayan Behera; Joe Yuichiro Wakano
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2004-02-21       Impact factor: 2.691

3.  Climate change and habitat destruction: a deadly anthropogenic cocktail.

Authors:  J M J Travis
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-03-07       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Interacting guilds: moving beyond the pairwise perspective on mutualisms.

Authors:  Maureen L Stanton
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.926

5.  The evolution of interspecific mutualisms.

Authors:  M Doebeli; N Knowlton
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-07-21       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Positive interactions in communities.

Authors:  M D Bertness; R Callaway
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2003-11-07       Impact factor: 17.712

7.  Do positive interactions increase with abiotic stress? A test from a semi-arid steppe.

Authors:  Fernando T Maestre; Jordi Cortina
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-08-07       Impact factor: 5.349

  7 in total
  9 in total

1.  Species removal and experimental warming in a subarctic tundra plant community.

Authors:  Christian Rixen; Christa P H Mulder
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2009-05-29       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Evolved dispersal strategies at range margins.

Authors:  Calvin Dytham
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-02-20       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Nitrogen preferences and plant-soil feedbacks as influenced by neighbors in the alpine tundra.

Authors:  I W Ashton; A E Miller; W D Bowman; K N Suding
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2008-03-18       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Density-dependence tips the change of plant-plant interactions under environmental stress.

Authors:  Ruichang Zhang; Katja Tielbörger
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 14.919

5.  Interaction of land management and araucaria trees in the maintenance of landscape diversity in the highlands of southern Brazil.

Authors:  Rafael Barbizan Sühs; Eduardo Luís Hettwer Giehl; Nivaldo Peroni
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-21       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Microhabitat amelioration and reduced competition among understorey plants as drivers of facilitation across environmental gradients: towards a unifying framework.

Authors:  Santiago Soliveres; David J Eldridge; Fernando T Maestre; Matthew A Bowker; Matthew Tighe; Adrián Escudero
Journal:  Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst       Date:  2011-11-20       Impact factor: 3.634

7.  Unidirectional prey-predator facilitation: apparent prey enhance predators' foraging success on cryptic prey.

Authors:  Yixin Zhang; John S Richardson
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2007-06-22       Impact factor: 3.703

8.  Models of experimentally derived competitive effects predict biogeographical differences in the abundance of invasive and native plant species.

Authors:  Sa Xiao; Guangyan Ni; Ragan M Callaway
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The influence of interspecific interactions on species range expansion rates.

Authors:  Jens-Christian Svenning; Dominique Gravel; Robert D Holt; Frank M Schurr; Wilfried Thuiller; Tamara Münkemüller; Katja H Schiffers; Stefan Dullinger; Thomas C Edwards; Thomas Hickler; Steven I Higgins; Julia E M S Nabel; Jörn Pagel; Signe Normand
Journal:  Ecography       Date:  2014-12-01       Impact factor: 5.992

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.