Literature DB >> 12075350

Positive interactions among alpine plants increase with stress.

Ragan M Callaway1, R W Brooker, Philippe Choler, Zaal Kikvidze, Christopher J Lortie, Richard Michalet, Leonardo Paolini, Francisco I Pugnaire, Beth Newingham, Erik T Aschehoug, Cristina Armas, David Kikodze, Bradley J Cook.   

Abstract

Plants can have positive effects on each other. For example, the accumulation of nutrients, provision of shade, amelioration of disturbance, or protection from herbivores by some species can enhance the performance of neighbouring species. Thus the notion that the distributions and abundances of plant species are independent of other species may be inadequate as a theoretical underpinning for understanding species coexistence and diversity. But there have been no large-scale experiments designed to examine the generality of positive interactions in plant communities and their importance relative to competition. Here we show that the biomass, growth and reproduction of alpine plant species are higher when other plants are nearby. In an experiment conducted in subalpine and alpine plant communities with 115 species in 11 different mountain ranges, we find that competition generally, but not exclusively, dominates interactions at lower elevations where conditions are less physically stressful. In contrast, at high elevations where abiotic stress is high the interactions among plants are predominantly positive. Furthermore, across all high and low sites positive interactions are more important at sites with low temperatures in the early summer, but competition prevails at warmer sites.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12075350     DOI: 10.1038/nature00812

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  237 in total

1.  The advancing timberline on Mt. Fuji: natural recovery or climate change?

Authors:  Hitoshi Sakio; Takehiro Masuzawa
Journal:  J Plant Res       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 2.629

2.  Balancing positive and negative plant interactions: how mosses structure vascular plant communities.

Authors:  Jemma L Gornall; Sarah J Woodin; Ingibjorg S Jónsdóttir; René van der Wal
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2011-01-30       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Negative effects overpower the positive of kelp to exclude invertebrates from the understorey community.

Authors:  Sean D Connell
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2003-06-19       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Why does grassland productivity increase with species richness? Disentangling species richness and composition with tests for overyielding and superyielding in biodiversity experiments.

Authors:  John M Drake
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-08-22       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Shrub spatial aggregation and consequences for reproductive success.

Authors:  Reyes Tirado; Francisco I Pugnaire
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2003-04-15       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Pollinator community structure and sources of spatial variation in plant--pollinator interactions in Clarkia xantiana ssp. xantiana.

Authors:  David A Moeller
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2004-08-26       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Assessment of biological and environmental phenology at a landscape level from 30 years of fixed-date repeat photography in northern Sweden.

Authors:  Christopher Andrews; Jan Dick; Christer Jonasson; Terry Callaghan
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 5.129

8.  The interplay of stress and mowing disturbance for the intensity and importance of plant interactions in dry calcareous grasslands.

Authors:  Jean-Paul Maalouf; Yoann Le Bagousse-Pinguet; Lilian Marchand; Blaise Touzard; Richard Michalet
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2012-07-09       Impact factor: 4.357

9.  Evaluating local adaptation of a complex phenotype: reciprocal tests of pigmy rattlesnake venoms on treefrog prey.

Authors:  Sarah A Smiley-Walters; Terence M Farrell; H Lisle Gibbs
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Host-synthesized secondary compounds influence the in vitro interactions between fungal endophytes of maize.

Authors:  Megan Saunders; Linda M Kohn
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2007-11-09       Impact factor: 4.792

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.