Literature DB >> 19479282

Species removal and experimental warming in a subarctic tundra plant community.

Christian Rixen1, Christa P H Mulder.   

Abstract

Neighbor interactions are likely to play an important role in subarctic plant communities. We conducted experiments in Interior Alaska in which we crossed species removal with greenhouse warming manipulations. We examined changes in community biomass, and in plant survival and growth of individual species in response to experimental warming and to: (1) removal of whole species versus an equivalent amount of biomass across many species, and (2) removal of subdominant (locally common) versus minor (locally uncommon) plants. Community biomass indicated compensation in growth after removal of minor species and after biomass removal without elimination of entire species, but under-compensation after removal of subdominants. Growth and survival of individual species showed facilitation between some species. Warming increased growth of dominant vascular plants, but at the same time reduced survival, and these impacts were greater for larger, more mesic species than for the smaller species associated with drier habitats. Growth of mosses was reduced by the warming. Removal effects did not differ between warming and ambient conditions. The results indicate that common species are able to reduce resources for others (competitive effect) and increase their growth after neighbor removal, whereas locally uncommon species are not able to respond rapidly to increased resources made available by neighbor removal. Therefore, the impact of the presence of common species on locally uncommon species was facilitative overall, but not vice versa. The balance between disturbances such as changes in temperature and species losses from the community will likely be crucial in determining shifts in subsequent community composition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19479282     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-009-1369-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  7 in total

1.  Positive interactions among alpine plants increase with stress.

Authors:  Ragan M Callaway; R W Brooker; Philippe Choler; Zaal Kikvidze; Christopher J Lortie; Richard Michalet; Leonardo Paolini; Francisco I Pugnaire; Beth Newingham; Erik T Aschehoug; Cristina Armas; David Kikodze; Bradley J Cook
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-06-20       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Do biotic interactions shape both sides of the humped-back model of species richness in plant communities?

Authors:  Richard Michalet; Robin W Brooker; Lohengrin A Cavieres; Zaal Kikvidze; Christopher J Lortie; Francisco I Pugnaire; Alfonso Valiente-Banuet; Ragan M Callaway
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 9.492

3.  The interplay of positive and negative species interactions across an environmental gradient: insights from an individual-based simulation model.

Authors:  J M J Travis; R W Brooker; C Dytham
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2005-03-22       Impact factor: 3.703

4.  Positive interactions in communities.

Authors:  M D Bertness; R Callaway
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2003-11-07       Impact factor: 17.712

5.  Nutrient and carbon relations in subalpine dwarf shrubs after neighbour removal or fertilization in northern Italy.

Authors:  Renato Gerdol; Lisa Brancaleoni; Roberta Marchesini; Luca Bragazza
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2002-02-01       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Competition intensity and its importance: results of field experiments with Anthoxanthum odoratum.

Authors:  M Sammul; K Kull; L Oksanen; P Veromann
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Plant functional types do not predict biomass responses to removal and fertilization in Alaskan tussock tundra.

Authors:  M Syndonia Bret-Harte; Michelle C Mack; Gregory R Goldsmith; Daniel B Sloan; Jennie Demarco; Gaius R Shaver; Peter M Ray; Zy Biesinger; F Stuart Chapin
Journal:  J Ecol       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 6.256

  7 in total
  3 in total

1.  Geographic location, local environment, and individual size mediate the effects of climate warming and neighbors on a benefactor plant.

Authors:  Jesús Villellas; María B García; William F Morris
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2018-11-22       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Facilitative interactions do not wane with warming at high elevations in the Andes.

Authors:  Lohengrin A Cavieres; Angela Sierra-Almeida
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2012-04-06       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Warming and neighbor removal affect white spruce seedling growth differently above and below treeline.

Authors:  Kyoko Okano; M Syndonia Bret-Harte
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2015-02-13
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.