Literature DB >> 14583854

Interacting guilds: moving beyond the pairwise perspective on mutualisms.

Maureen L Stanton1.   

Abstract

Most textbook treatments imply, and almost all theoretical analyses assume, that mutualistic interactions take place between a single pair of interacting partner species. A major goal of this symposium is to broaden and shift this pairwise perspective and make it concordant with the emerging view that locally exclusive mutualisms between just two species are the exception and that many communities include guilds of mutualistic species on one or both sides of the interaction. Many pollination and seed-dispersal mutualisms have long been recognized as diffuse, but recent molecular analyses are revealing unrecognized partner diversity in mutualistic interactions previously thought to be locally species specific. Co-occurring species within a mutualist guild are unlikely to be ecologically equivalent in the way they locate, compete for, and/or reward partners, and so intraguild interactions have the potential to influence population dynamics and patterns of selection in species on both sides of the mutualistic interaction. To illustrate some of these potential complexities for population dynamics, I use simple path analytic models to show that positive pairwise interactions between mutualists do not necessarily translate into positive net interactions within a mutualism involving more than two species. For example, when there is intraguild competition for partners, or even for resources external to the mutualism, the presence of a lower-quality mutualist can negatively affect the partner population by reducing associations it can form with better mutualists. Variation in quality among potential partners is likely to place a premium on traits or behaviors that enhance association with better mutualists. More investigations are needed to determine how variation among interacting mutualists, with respect to characteristics such as longevity, dispersal capability, and competitive ability, influence population dynamics and selection in multispecies mutualisms.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14583854     DOI: 10.1086/378646

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Nat        ISSN: 0003-0147            Impact factor:   3.926


  49 in total

1.  Synergy of multiple partners, including freeloaders, increases host fitness in a multispecies mutualism.

Authors:  Todd M Palmer; Daniel F Doak; Maureen L Stanton; Judith L Bronstein; E Toby Kiers; Truman P Young; Jacob R Goheen; Robert M Pringle
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-09-20       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Dynamics of the association between a long-lived understory myrmecophyte and its specific associated ants.

Authors:  Jérôme Orivel; Luc Lambs; Pierre-Jean G Malé; Céline Leroy; Julien Grangier; Thierry Otto; Angélique Quilichini; Alain Dejean
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Variable nursery pollinator importance and its effect on plant reproductive success.

Authors:  Richard J Reynolds; Abigail A R Kula; Charles B Fenster; Michele R Dudash
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2011-08-11       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Cryptic sex and many-to-one coevolution in the fungus-growing ant symbiosis.

Authors:  Alexander S Mikheyev; Ulrich G Mueller; Patrick Abbot
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-06-30       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  The interplay of positive and negative species interactions across an environmental gradient: insights from an individual-based simulation model.

Authors:  J M J Travis; R W Brooker; C Dytham
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2005-03-22       Impact factor: 3.703

6.  Antagonisms, mutualisms and commensalisms affect outbreak dynamics of the southern pine beetle.

Authors:  Richard W Hofstetter; James T Cronin; Kier D Klepzig; John C Moser; Matthew P Ayres
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2005-12-02       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  A keystone ant species promotes seed dispersal in a "diffuse" mutualism.

Authors:  Aaron D Gove; Jonathan D Majer; Robert R Dunn
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2007-05-30       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Interactions between nectar robbers and seed predators mediated by a shared host plant, Ipomopsis aggregata.

Authors:  Alison K Brody; Rebecca E Irwin; Meghan L McCutcheon; Emily C Parsons
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2007-10-27       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Trade-offs between arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal competitive ability and host growth promotion in Plantago lanceolata.

Authors:  Alison Elizabeth Bennett; James D Bever
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2009-04-18       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Ant species confer different partner benefits on two neotropical myrmecophytes.

Authors:  Megan E Frederickson
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2005-02-12       Impact factor: 3.225

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.