Literature DB >> 14759648

Evolution of mutualism through spatial effects.

Norio Yamamura1, Masahiko Higashi, Narayan Behera, Joe Yuichiro Wakano.   

Abstract

Mutualism among species is ubiquitous in natural ecosystems but its evolution is not well understood. We provided a simple lattice model to clarify the importance of spatial structure for the evolution of mutualism. We assumed reproductive rates of two species are modified through interaction between species and examine conditions where mutualists of both species, that give some benefit to the other species with their own cost, invade non-mutualists populations. When dispersal of offspring is unlimited, we verified the evolution of mutualism is impossible under any condition. On the other hand, when the dispersal is limited to neighboring lattice sites, mutualists can invade if the ratio of cost to benefit is low and the intrinsic reproductive rate is low in case where the parameter values are symmetric between species. Under the same conditions, non-mutualists cannot invade mutualist populations, that is, the latter are evolutionarily stable. In case of asymmetric parameters, mutualists tend to invade if the average value of costs to two species is low or that of benefits is high, and if the intrinsic reproductive rate is low for one of the two species. A mechanistic explanation of why mutualists increase when the dispersal is limited is given by showing that mutualist pairs of the two species at the same lattice site rapidly increase at the initial phase of the invasion.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14759648     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2003.09.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Theor Biol        ISSN: 0022-5193            Impact factor:   2.691


  19 in total

Review 1.  Cooperation for direct fitness benefits.

Authors:  Olof Leimar; Peter Hammerstein
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-09-12       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Endosymbionts escape dead hydrothermal vent tubeworms to enrich the free-living population.

Authors:  Julia Klose; Martin F Polz; Michael Wagner; Mario P Schimak; Sabine Gollner; Monika Bright
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-08-17       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Cheating can stabilize cooperation in mutualisms.

Authors:  Kevin R Foster; Hanna Kokko
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-09-07       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  The interplay of positive and negative species interactions across an environmental gradient: insights from an individual-based simulation model.

Authors:  J M J Travis; R W Brooker; C Dytham
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2005-03-22       Impact factor: 3.703

5.  Altruism and antagonistic pleiotropy in Penna ageing model.

Authors:  Stanisław Cebrat; Dietrich Stauffer
Journal:  Theory Biosci       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 1.919

6.  Population viscosity can promote the evolution of altruistic sterile helpers and eusociality.

Authors:  Laurent Lehmann; Virginie Ravigné; Laurent Keller
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-08-22       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Adding biotic complexity alters the metabolic benefits of mutualism.

Authors:  William R Harcombe; Alex Betts; Jason W Shapiro; Christopher J Marx
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 3.694

8.  Understanding the evolution of interspecies interactions in microbial communities.

Authors:  Florien A Gorter; Michael Manhart; Martin Ackermann
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-03-23       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  Strategy selection in structured populations.

Authors:  Corina E Tarnita; Hisashi Ohtsuki; Tibor Antal; Feng Fu; Martin A Nowak
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2009-04-07       Impact factor: 2.691

Review 10.  Evolutionary dynamics in structured populations.

Authors:  Martin A Nowak; Corina E Tarnita; Tibor Antal
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-01-12       Impact factor: 6.237

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.