Literature DB >> 18193238

Importance of postpolypectomy surveillance and postpolypectomy compliance to follow-up screening--review of literature.

Sri Rapuri1, Jeanne Spencer, Dennis Eckels.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Approximately 150,000 people are diagnosed with colorectal cancer each year and 56,000 may die from it annually in the United States. Colorectal cancer is the second leading cause of cancer deaths in the USA and yet, when diagnosed at an early stage, it is one of the most preventable cancers. According to the US Preventive Services Task Force, initial screening for colorectal cancer is recommended in people above 50 years of age with average risk and earlier in people with a strong family history and other risk factors. Adenomatous polyps are considered as precursors of colorectal cancer. Removal of polyps and postpolypectomy surveillance reduces the overall mortality from colorectal cancer. DISCUSSION: According to updated guidelines in 2006, a 3-year-follow-up colonoscopy is recommended in patients with adenomatous polyps>or=1 cm. An important factor in the surveillance and prevention of colorectal cancer in postpolypectomy patients is compliance with follow-up colonoscopy. In the present article, we provide an overview of the importance of postpolypectomy surveillance and summarize the compliance data for postpolypectomy surveillance. Compliance to postpolypectomy surveillance varies from one study to another and it should be expected that the compliance with follow-up would be low outside of clinical trials. Some measures that can improve patient compliance include patient education regarding a need of follow-up screening, reminder letters, and alerts in patient's charts.
CONCLUSION: In conclusion, effective surveillance screening with good patient compliance in postpolypectomy patients will contribute significantly in reducing colon cancer morbidity and mortality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18193238     DOI: 10.1007/s00384-007-0430-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 0179-1958            Impact factor:   2.796


  54 in total

1.  [Colorectal carcinoma: prevention and early detection in an asymptomatic population--prevention in patients at risk--endoscopic diagnosis, therapy and after-care of polyps and carcinomas. German Society of Digestive and Metabolic Diseases/Study Group for Gastrointestinal Oncology].

Authors:  W Schmiegel; G Adler; P Frühmorgen; U Fölsch; U Graeven; P Layer; S Petrasch; R Porschen; C Pox; T Sauerbruch; H J Schmoll; M Zeitz
Journal:  Z Gastroenterol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 2.000

2.  Efficacy in standard clinical practice of colonoscopic polypectomy in reducing colorectal cancer incidence.

Authors:  F Citarda; G Tomaselli; R Capocaccia; S Barcherini; M Crespi
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 3.  Interventions to improve follow-up of abnormal findings in cancer screening.

Authors:  Roshan Bastani; K Robin Yabroff; Ronald E Myers; Beth Glenn
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2004-09-01       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Cholecystectomy and the risk of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Theresa Shao; Yu-Xiao Yang
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 5.  Epidemiology of colorectal adenomatous polyps.

Authors:  A I Neugut; J S Jacobson; I De Vivo
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  1993 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.254

6.  Significance of a normal surveillance colonoscopy in patients with a history of adenomatous polyps.

Authors:  D Blumberg; F G Opelka; T C Hicks; A E Timmcke; D E Beck
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.585

7.  Cancer statistics, 2001.

Authors:  R T Greenlee; M B Hill-Harmon; T Murray; M Thun
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2001 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 508.702

8.  Mortality in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis.

Authors:  M L Arvanitis; D G Jagelman; V W Fazio; I C Lavery; E McGannon
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 4.585

9.  Cancer risk in relatives of patients with common colorectal cancer.

Authors:  D J St John; F T McDermott; J L Hopper; E A Debney; W R Johnson; E S Hughes
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1993-05-15       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  Incidence and recurrence rates of colorectal adenomas: a prospective study.

Authors:  A I Neugut; J S Jacobson; H Ahsan; J Santos; G C Garbowski; K A Forde; M R Treat; J Waye
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 22.682

View more
  10 in total

1.  Endoscopic follow-up after surgery for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  R J L F Loffeld
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-07-09       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 2.  Computed tomography colonography for the practicing radiologist: A review of current recommendations on methodology and clinical indications.

Authors:  Paola Scalise; Annalisa Mantarro; Francesca Pancrazi; Emanuele Neri
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2016-05-28

3.  The incidence of post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer: a retrospective long-term cohort study using a colonoscopy database.

Authors:  Ayako Nakada; Ryota Niikura; Atsuo Yamada; Shuntaro Yoshida; Yoshihiro Hirata; Kazuhiko Koike
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2017-01-14       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Breast cancer screening outreach effectiveness: Mammogram-specific reminders vs. comprehensive preventive services birthday letters.

Authors:  Diana S M Buist; Hongyuan Gao; Melissa L Anderson; Tracy Onega; Susan Brandzel; Melissa A Rabelhofer; Susan Carol Bradford; Erin J Aiello Bowles
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2017-06-24       Impact factor: 4.018

Review 5.  Computed tomography colonography in 2014: an update on technique and indications.

Authors:  Andrea Laghi
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-12-07       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Physician recommendations and patient adherence after inadequate bowel preparation on screening colonoscopy.

Authors:  Reena V Chokshi; Christine E Hovis; Graham A Colditz; Dayna S Early; Jean S Wang
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2013-03-28       Impact factor: 3.199

7.  The appropriateness of surveillance colonoscopy intervals after polypectomy.

Authors:  Eline Schreuders; Jerome Sint Nicolaas; Vincent de Jonge; Harmke van Kooten; Isaac Soo; Daniel Sadowski; Clarence Wong; Monique E van Leerdam; Ernst J Kuipers; Sander J O Veldhuyzen van Zanten
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 3.522

8.  Korean guidelines for postpolypectomy colonoscopy surveillance.

Authors:  Dong-Hoon Yang; Sung Noh Hong; Young-Ho Kim; Sung Pil Hong; Sung Jae Shin; Seong-Eun Kim; Bo In Lee; Suck-Ho Lee; Dong Il Park; Hyun-Soo Kim; Suk-Kyun Yang; Hyo Jong Kim; Se Hyung Kim; Hyun Jung Kim
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2012-03-31

9.  Clinical indications for computed tomographic colonography: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) Guideline.

Authors:  Cristiano Spada; Jaap Stoker; Onofre Alarcon; Federico Barbaro; Davide Bellini; Michael Bretthauer; Margriet C De Haan; Jean-Marc Dumonceau; Monika Ferlitsch; Steve Halligan; Emma Helbren; Mikael Hellstrom; Ernst J Kuipers; Philippe Lefere; Thomas Mang; Emanuele Neri; Lucio Petruzziello; Andrew Plumb; Daniele Regge; Stuart A Taylor; Cesare Hassan; Andrea Laghi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Appropriateness of colonoscopy requests according to EPAGE-II in the Spanish region of Catalonia.

Authors:  M Marzo-Castillejo; J Almeda; J J Mascort; O Cunillera; R Saladich; R Nieto; P Piñeiro; M Llagostera; Fx Cantero; M Segarra; D Puente
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 2.497

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.