Literature DB >> 23931862

Colonoscopy quality: metrics and implementation.

Audrey H Calderwood1, Brian C Jacobson.   

Abstract

Colonoscopy is an excellent area for quality improvement because it is high volume, has significant associated risk and expense, and there is evidence that variability in its performance affects outcomes. The best end point for validation of quality metrics in colonoscopy is colorectal cancer incidence and mortality, but a more readily accessible metric is the adenoma detection rate. Fourteen quality metrics were proposed in 2006, and these are described in this article. Implementation of quality improvement initiatives involves rapid assessments and changes on an iterative basis, and can be done at the individual, group, or facility level.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colonoscopy; Metrics; Quality; Quality improvement

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23931862      PMCID: PMC3741615          DOI: 10.1016/j.gtc.2013.05.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastroenterol Clin North Am        ISSN: 0889-8553            Impact factor:   3.806


  79 in total

1.  How many endoscopies are performed for colorectal cancer screening? Results from CDC's survey of endoscopic capacity.

Authors:  Laura C Seeff; Thomas B Richards; Jean A Shapiro; Marion R Nadel; Diane L Manninen; Leslie S Given; Fred B Dong; Linda D Winges; Matthew T McKenna
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 22.682

2.  A framework for capturing clinical data sets from computerized sources.

Authors:  C J McDonald; J M Overhage; P Dexter; B Y Takesue; D M Dwyer
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1997-10-15       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  Colonoscopy quality measures: experience from the NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme.

Authors:  Thomas J W Lee; Matthew D Rutter; Roger G Blanks; Sue M Moss; Andrew F Goddard; Andrew Chilton; Claire Nickerson; Richard J Q McNally; Julietta Patnick; Colin J Rees
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 23.059

4.  Attendance at surveillance endoscopy of patients with adenoma or colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Sanna A Mulder; Monique E Van Leerdam; Rob J Th Ouwendijk; Dirk J Bac; Raimond W M Giard; Ernst J Kuipers
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 2.423

5.  Prevalence and variable detection of proximal colon serrated polyps during screening colonoscopy.

Authors:  Charles J Kahi; David G Hewett; Dustin Lee Norton; George J Eckert; Douglas K Rex
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2010-10-01       Impact factor: 11.382

6.  Quality evaluation of colonoscopy reporting and colonoscopy performance in daily clinical practice.

Authors:  Vincent de Jonge; Jerome Sint Nicolaas; Djuna L Cahen; Willem Moolenaar; Rob J Th Ouwendijk; Thjon J Tang; Antonie J P van Tilburg; Ernst J Kuipers; Monique E van Leerdam
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2011-09-10       Impact factor: 9.427

7.  Colonoscopy: practice variation among 69 hospital-based endoscopists.

Authors:  Peter B Cotton; Patrick Connor; Daniel McGee; Paul Jowell; Nick Nickl; Steve Schutz; Joseph Leung; John Lee; Eric Libby
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 9.427

8.  Impact of colonic cleansing on quality and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy: the European Panel of Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy European multicenter study.

Authors:  Florian Froehlich; Vincent Wietlisbach; Jean-Jacques Gonvers; Bernard Burnand; John-Paul Vader
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 9.427

9.  Reasons for failure to diagnose colorectal carcinoma at colonoscopy.

Authors:  M Leaper; M J Johnston; M Barclay; B R Dobbs; F A Frizelle
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 10.093

Review 10.  Progress and challenges in colorectal cancer screening and surveillance.

Authors:  David Lieberman
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2010-02-16       Impact factor: 22.682

View more
  10 in total

1.  Physician report cards and implementing standards of practice are both significantly associated with improved screening colonoscopy quality.

Authors:  Rajesh N Keswani; Rena Yadlapati; Kristine M Gleason; Jody D Ciolino; Michael Manka; Kevin J O'Leary; Cynthia Barnard; John E Pandolfino
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 10.864

2.  Good is better than excellent: bowel preparation quality and adenoma detection rates.

Authors:  Audrey H Calderwood; Katherine D Thompson; Paul C Schroy; David A Lieberman; Brian C Jacobson
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 9.427

3.  Post-polypectomy follow-up recommendations by practicing academic gastroenterologists-does number of years in practice matter?

Authors:  Kofi Clarke; Kara DiJoseph; Rachel White; Ibrahim Yaghnam; Roland Lee; Jonathan G Stine
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 2.796

4.  Adenoma Detection Rate Falls at the End of the Day in a Large Multi-site Sample.

Authors:  Felippe O Marcondes; Rebecca A Gourevitch; Robert E Schoen; Seth D Crockett; Michele Morris; Ateev Mehrotra
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2018-02-03       Impact factor: 3.199

5.  Natural language processing as an alternative to manual reporting of colonoscopy quality metrics.

Authors:  Gottumukkala S Raju; Phillip J Lum; Rebecca S Slack; Selvi Thirumurthi; Patrick M Lynch; Ethan Miller; Brian R Weston; Marta L Davila; Manoop S Bhutani; Mehnaz A Shafi; Robert S Bresalier; Alexander A Dekovich; Jeffrey H Lee; Sushovan Guha; Mala Pande; Boris Blechacz; Asif Rashid; Mark Routbort; Gladis Shuttlesworth; Lopa Mishra; John R Stroehlein; William A Ross
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 9.427

6.  Optimizing Colonoscopy Quality: From Bowel Preparation to Surveillance.

Authors:  Carla G Abou Fadel; Rani H Shayto; Ala I Sharara
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-03

Review 7.  Blood-based microRNAs as biomarkers for the diagnosis of colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jane V Carter; Norman J Galbraith; Dongyan Yang; James F Burton; Samuel P Walker; Susan Galandiuk
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  Software Analysis of Colonoscopy Videos Enhances Teaching and Quality Metrics.

Authors:  Vasant Rajan; Havish Srinath; Christopher Yii Siang Bong; Alex Cichowski; Christopher J Young; Peter J Hewett
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-03-10

Review 9.  A Review on the Quality of Colonoscopy Reporting.

Authors:  Robyn S Sharma; Peter G Rossos
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2016-04-26

10.  Impact of feedback and monitoring on colonoscopy withdrawal times and polyp detection rates.

Authors:  Amalie Bach Nielsen; Ole Haagen Nielsen; Jakob Hendel
Journal:  BMJ Open Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-06-01
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.