Literature DB >> 11473327

Right-sided shift found in metachronous colorectal adenomas.

G Nusko1, U Mansmann, G Wiest, W Brueckl, T Kirchner, E G Hahn.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Patients who have had a colorectal adenoma are likely to develop a metachronous adenoma, and therefore need to be kept under surveillance. The question is whether metachronous adenomas will be found at the same anatomical site as the preceding adenomas, thus prompting us to focus surveillance examinations on this region, using flexible sigmoidoscopy or total colonoscopy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1978 and 1996 a long-term follow up of 1091 patients was prospectively documented at the Erlangen Registry of Colorectal Polyps. The anatomical sites--distal (rectosigmoid) and proximal colon--of two subsequent generations of metachronous adenomas were analysed using logistic regression analysis.
RESULTS: In 556 (51%) patients metachronous adenomas were found during follow up. In 211 (37.9%) of these patients a right-sided shift in the first generation of metachronous adenomas in comparison with initial lesions (P<0.0001) was found. Some 305 patients underwent further follow up, and 51 (27.1%) out of 188 patients with metachronous lesions demonstrated a right-sided shift in their second generation (vs. first generation) of metachronous adenomas. Proximally located first generation metachronous adenomas would be missed by flexible sigmoidoscopy in 50.8% of patients with only distal adenomas at baseline colonoscopy, and in 58.7% of patients with second-generation lesions. Multivariate analysis revealed that multiplicity (odds ratio 2.64, 95% CI 1.49-4.66) and size of initial adenomas (>5 mm) (odds ratio 3.60, 95% CI 1.96-6.66) were significantly associated with a right-sided shift in metachronous adenomas, while female gender was associated with a significantly lower tendency to manifest a right-sided shift (odds ratio of 0.64. 95% CI 0.43-0.94).
CONCLUSIONS: Metachronous adenomas are found significantly more often in the right colon than would be expected assuming clustering at the same anatomical site as the preceding lesions. Total colonoscopy is thus needed for surveillance, regardless of the initial adenoma site.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11473327     DOI: 10.1055/s-2001-15379

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endoscopy        ISSN: 0013-726X            Impact factor:   10.093


  7 in total

1.  Non-compliance in surveillance for patients with previous resection of large (> or = 1 cm) colorectal adenomas.

Authors:  Wolfgang-M Brueckl; Berit Fritsche; Brigitte Seifert; Frank Boxberger; Heinz Albrecht; Roland-S Croner; Axel Wein; Eckhart-G Hahn
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-12-07       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Detection rate and proximal shift tendency of adenomas and serrated polyps: a retrospective study of 62,560 colonoscopies.

Authors:  Shuling Chen; Kaiyu Sun; Kang Chao; Yuli Sun; Liru Hong; Zijin Weng; Yi Cui; Minhu Chen; Shenghong Zhang
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2017-12-27       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Estimating the unknown parameters of the natural history of metachronous colorectal cancer using discrete-event simulation.

Authors:  Fatih Safa Erenay; Oguzhan Alagoz; Ritesh Banerjee; Robert R Cima
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2011-01-06       Impact factor: 2.583

4.  Likelihood of missed and recurrent adenomas in the proximal versus the distal colon.

Authors:  Adeyinka O Laiyemo; Chyke Doubeni; Andrew K Sanderson; Paul F Pinsky; Dilhana S Badurdeen; V Paul Doria-Rose; Pamela M Marcus; Robert E Schoen; Elaine Lanza; Arthur Schatzkin; Amanda J Cross
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2011-05-06       Impact factor: 9.427

5.  Risk related surveillance following colorectal polypectomy.

Authors:  G Nusko; U Mansmann; Th Kirchner; E G Hahn
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 23.059

6.  Risk of advanced metachronous colorectal adenoma during long-term follow-up.

Authors:  G Nusko; E G Hahn; U Mansmann
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2008-07-03       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Follow-up after colorectal polypectomy: a benefit-risk analysis of German surveillance recommendations.

Authors:  F Becker; G Nusko; J Welke; E G Hahn; U Mansmann
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2007-02-06       Impact factor: 2.796

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.