Literature DB >> 17140828

Field evaluation of the Welch Allyn SureSight vision screener: incorporating the vision in preschoolers study recommendations.

Ashley J Rowatt1, Sean P Donahue, Colin Crosby, Alissa Craft Hudson, Sylvia Simon, Kathy Emmons.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The prospective Vision in Preschoolers (VIP) study evaluated 11 methods of screening and proposed referral criteria for the Welch Allyn SureSight(trade mark) Vision Screener with 90% and 94% specificity. The SureSight had a higher sensitivity than most other screening techniques when these criteria were applied. We evaluated the usefulness of these criteria in a field study of healthy preschool children.
METHODS: The SureSight software was altered to recommend referral using the VIP referral criteria with 90% specificity. Lions Club volunteers screened preschool children throughout Tennessee. Referred children underwent comprehensive eye examinations with cycloplegic refraction. Examination failure criteria were based upon published standards. Reanalysis using the 94% specificity criteria was then performed. Outcomes included referral rate and positive predictive value.
RESULTS: The SureSight was used to screen 4,733 children, and screening was successful in 99.7% of children. The referral rate using the 90% specificity criteria was 12.2%. Most children (73%) were referred for suspected astigmatism. The positive predictive value was 30%. Using the 94% specificity criteria from the VIP study decreased the referral rate to 7.9% and substantially decreased over referral for suspected astigmatism; however, several anisometropes went undetected. Higher specificity was achieved by raising astigmatism referral criteria to 2.2 diopters while leaving the anisometropia criteria unchanged.
CONCLUSIONS: The SureSight can be used successfully for preschool screening in the field provided that criteria with high specificity are incorporated into the instrument's software program. Higher rates of positive predictive value can be achieved without jeopardizing sensitivity by raising astigmatism referral criteria to 2.2 diopters.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17140828     DOI: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2006.09.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J AAPOS        ISSN: 1091-8531            Impact factor:   1.220


  8 in total

1.  Accuracy of noncycloplegic retinoscopy, retinomax autorefractor, and SureSight vision screener for detecting significant refractive errors.

Authors:  Marjean Taylor Kulp; Gui-Shuang Ying; Jiayan Huang; Maureen Maguire; Graham Quinn; Elise B Ciner; Lynn A Cyert; Deborah A Orel-Bixler; Bruce D Moore
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  ROC analysis of the accuracy of Noncycloplegic retinoscopy, Retinomax Autorefractor, and SureSight Vision Screener for preschool vision screening.

Authors:  Gui-shuang Ying; Maureen Maguire; Graham Quinn; Marjean Taylor Kulp; Lynn Cyert
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2011-12-28       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Accuracy of the Welch Allyn SureSight for measurement of magnitude of astigmatism in 3- to 7-year-old children.

Authors:  Erin M Harvey; Velma Dobson; Joseph M Miller; Candice E Clifford-Donaldson; Tina K Green; Dawn H Messer; Katherine A Garvey
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 1.220

4.  Impact of confidence number on accuracy of the SureSight Vision Screener.

Authors: 
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.973

5.  Utility of an open field Shack-Hartmann aberrometer for measurement of refractive error in infants and young children.

Authors:  Erin M Harvey; Joseph M Miller; Jim Schwiegerling
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.220

6.  Intertester agreement in refractive error measurements.

Authors:  Jiayan Huang; Maureen G Maguire; Elise Ciner; Marjean T Kulp; Graham E Quinn; Deborah Orel-Bixler; Lynn A Cyert; Bruce Moore; Gui-Shuang Ying
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.973

7.  Is noncycloplegic photorefraction applicable for screening refractive amblyopia risk factors?

Authors:  Zhale Rajavi; Hiva Parsafar; Alireza Ramezani; Mehdi Yaseri
Journal:  J Ophthalmic Vis Res       Date:  2012-01

Review 8.  Scope and costs of autorefraction and photoscreening for childhood amblyopia-a systematic narrative review in relation to the EUSCREEN project data.

Authors:  Anna M Horwood; Helen J Griffiths; Jill Carlton; Paolo Mazzone; Arinder Channa; Mandy Nordmann; Huibert J Simonsz
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2020-11-30       Impact factor: 3.775

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.