Literature DB >> 17128608

Theory-based categorization under speeded conditions.

Christian C Luhmann1, Woo-Kyoung Ahn, Thomas J Palmeri.   

Abstract

It is widely accepted that similarity influences rapid categorization, whereas theories can influence only more leisurely category judgments. In contrast, we argue that it is not the type of knowledge used that determines categorization speed, but rather the complexity of the categorization processes. In two experiments, participants learned four categories of items, each consisting of three causally related features. Participants gave more weight to cause features than to effect features, even under speeded response conditions. Furthermore, the time required to make judgments was equivalent, regardless of whether participants were using causal knowledge or base-rate information. We argue that both causal knowledge and base-rate information, once precompiled during learning, can be used at roughly the same speeds during categorization, thus demonstrating an important parallel between these two types of knowledge.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17128608      PMCID: PMC2750807          DOI: 10.3758/bf03193256

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  14 in total

1.  Causal status as a determinant of feature centrality.

Authors:  W Ahn; N S Kim; M E Lassaline; M J Dennis
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  The role of background knowledge in speeded perceptual categorization.

Authors:  T J Palmeri; C Blalock
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2000-11-16

3.  Assessing the causal structure of function.

Authors:  Sergio E Chaigneau; Lawrence W Barsalou; Steven A Sloman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2004-12

4.  Role of specific similarity in a medical diagnostic task.

Authors:  L R Brooks; G R Norman; S W Allen
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1991-09

5.  Intention, history, and artifact concepts.

Authors:  P Bloom
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1996-07

6.  Context and structure in conceptual combination.

Authors:  D L Medin; E J Shoben
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Problem structure and the use of base-rate information from experience.

Authors:  D L Medin; S M Edelson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1988-03

8.  Similarity- versus rule-based categorization.

Authors:  E E Smith; S A Sloman
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1994-07

9.  The role of theories in conceptual coherence.

Authors:  G L Murphy; D L Medin
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 8.934

10.  From conditioning to category learning: an adaptive network model.

Authors:  M A Gluck; G H Bower
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1988-09
View more
  6 in total

1.  Psychological essentialist reasoning and perspective taking during reading: a donkey is not a zebra, but a plate can be a clock.

Authors:  Steven Frisson; Mary Wakefield
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-02

2.  Category labels versus feature labels: category labels polarize inferential predictions.

Authors:  Takashi Yamauchi; Na-Yung Yu
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-04

3.  How prior knowledge affects selective attention during category learning: an eyetracking study.

Authors:  Shinwoo Kim; Bob Rehder
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2011-05

Review 4.  Categorization = decision making + generalization.

Authors:  Carol A Seger; Erik J Peterson
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2013-03-30       Impact factor: 8.989

5.  See what I mean? An ERP study of the effect of background knowledge on novel object processing.

Authors:  Caterina Gratton; Karen M Evans; Kara D Federmeier
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2009-04

6.  The Hidden Strengths of Weak Theories.

Authors:  Frank Keil
Journal:  Anthropol Philos       Date:  2011-01-01
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.