Literature DB >> 18491494

Category labels versus feature labels: category labels polarize inferential predictions.

Takashi Yamauchi1, Na-Yung Yu.   

Abstract

What makes category labels different from feature labels in predictive inference? This study suggests that category labels tend to make inductive reasoning polarized and homogeneous. In two experiments, participants were shown two schematic pictures of insects side by side and predicted the value of a hidden feature of one insect on the basis of the other insect. Arbitrary verbal labels were shown above the two pictures, and the meanings of the labels were manipulated in the instructions. In one condition, the labels represented the category membership of the insects, and in the other conditions, the same labels represented attributes of the insects. When the labels represented category membership, participants' responses became substantially polarized and homogeneous, indicating that the mere reference to category membership can modify reasoning processes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18491494     DOI: 10.3758/mc.36.3.544

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  28 in total

1.  Acquiring generic knowledge.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  The role of similarity in the development of categorization.

Authors:  Vladimir M. Sloutsky
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 20.229

3.  Linguistic determinism and the part of speech.

Authors:  R W BROWN
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  1957-07

4.  ALCOVE: an exemplar-based connectionist model of category learning.

Authors:  J K Kruschke
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  Categories and causality: the neglected direction.

Authors:  Michael R Waldmann; York Hagmayer
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2006-02-23       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Categories and induction in young children.

Authors:  S A Gelman; E M Markman
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1986-08

7.  Similarity- versus rule-based categorization.

Authors:  E E Smith; S A Sloman
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1994-07

8.  Similarity and property effects in inductive reasoning.

Authors:  E Heit; J Rubinstein
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  Theory-based categorization under speeded conditions.

Authors:  Christian C Luhmann; Woo-Kyoung Ahn; Thomas J Palmeri
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-07

10.  The influence of hierarchy on probability judgment.

Authors:  David A Lagnado; David R Shanks
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2003-09
View more
  5 in total

1.  Tracking mouse movement in feature inference: category labels are different from feature labels.

Authors:  Takashm Yamauchi; Nicholas Kohn; Na-Yung Yu
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-07

2.  Categorizing entities by common role.

Authors:  Micah B Goldwater; Arthur B Markman
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-04

3.  From Perceptual Categories to Concepts: What Develops?

Authors:  Vladimir M Sloutsky
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2010-09-01

4.  Inductive generalization with familiar categories: developmental changes in children's reliance on perceptual similarity and kind information.

Authors:  Karrie E Godwin; Anna V Fisher
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-07-07

5.  Premise typicality as feature inference decision-making in perceptual categories.

Authors:  Emma L Morgan; Mark K Johansen
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2021-10-08
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.