Literature DB >> 17125478

Impact of surgical margin status on long-term cancer control after radical prostatectomy.

Marcelo A Orvieto1, Nejd F Alsikafi, Arieh L Shalhav, Brett A Laven, Gary D Steinberg, Gregory P Zagaja, Charles B Brendler.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether previously described technical modifications that significantly decreased the positive surgical margin (PSM) rate have translated into improved long-term cancer control, as SM status is generally recognized as an independent risk factor for biochemical recurrence (BR) after radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP), and is the only factor that can be modified by surgical technique. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between March 1994 and December 2004, 996 consecutive patients had RRP as the sole treatment for clinically localized prostate cancer. The surgery was done by one surgeon (C.B.B.) and the data were prospectively reviewed. <br> RESULTS: The overall PSM rate was 8.8%; the PSM rate by pathological stage was 1.7%, 24.2% and 27.1% for men with pT2, pT3a and pT3b disease, respectively (P < 0.001). In all, 968 of 996 (97.2%) patients were available for the follow-up (mean 6.4 years); 69 of 883 (7.8%) with negative SMs (NSMs) developed BR, vs 29 of 85 (34%) with PSMs (P < 0.001). The actuarial 5- and 10-year biochemical disease-free survival was 92.1% and 89.6%, and 70.6% and 59.9%, for patients with NSM and PSM, respectively (P < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, PSM, pathological stage and Gleason grade were the strongest predictors of BR (P < 0.001). The preoperative prostate-specific antigen level, and clinical stage T1c and T2a disease were not associated with recurrence. The hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) for BR in patients with PSMs was 3.27 (2.1-5.1). <br> CONCLUSIONS: RRP including the previously described surgical modifications not only decreased the PSM rate but also resulted in excellent long-term cancer control. The importance of meticulous surgical technique in RRP cannot be overemphasised.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17125478     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.06563.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  13 in total

1.  Factors determining biochemical recurrence in low-risk prostate cancer patients who underwent radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Sıtkı Ün; Hakan Türk; Osman Koca; Rauf Taner Divrik; Ferruh Zorlu
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2015-06

Review 2.  Robot-assisted prostatectomy: the new standard of care.

Authors:  Gencay Hatiboglu; Dogu Teber; Markus Hohenfellner
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 3.445

3.  Toward microendoscopic electrical impedance tomography for intraoperative surgical margin assessment.

Authors:  Ryan J Halter; Young-Joong Kim
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2014-06-06       Impact factor: 4.538

4.  Prostate Cancer Detection Using Composite Impedance Metric.

Authors:  Shadab Khan; Aditya Mahara; Elias S Hyams; Alan R Schned; Ryan J Halter
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2016-06-09       Impact factor: 10.048

5.  Location, extent, and multifocality of positive surgical margins for biochemical recurrence prediction after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Guillaume Ploussard; Sarah J Drouin; Julie Rode; Yves Allory; Dimitri Vordos; Andras Hoznek; Claude-Clément Abbou; Alexandre de la Taille; Laurent Salomon
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Comparative study of separation between ex vivo prostatic malignant and benign tissue using electrical impedance spectroscopy and electrical impedance tomography.

Authors:  Ethan K Murphy; Aditya Mahara; Shadab Khan; Elias S Hyams; Alan R Schned; Jason Pettus; Ryan J Halter
Journal:  Physiol Meas       Date:  2017-03-10       Impact factor: 2.833

7.  Cancer Care Ontario Guidelines for radical prostatectomy: striving for continuous quality improvement in community practice.

Authors:  Todd M Webster; Christopher Newell; John F Amrhein; Ken J Newell
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.862

8.  The need for, and utilization of prostate-bed radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy for patients with prostate cancer in British Columbia.

Authors:  Scott Tyldesley; Michael Peacock; James W Morris; Alan So; Charmaine Kim-Sing; Jill Quirt; Michael Carter; Tom Pickles
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 9.  Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a critical review of outcomes reported by high-volume centers.

Authors:  Rafael F Coelho; Bernardo Rocco; Manoj B Patel; Marcelo A Orvieto; Sanket Chauhan; Vincenzo Ficarra; Sara Melegari; Kenneth J Palmer; Vipul R Patel
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2010-10-13       Impact factor: 2.942

10.  Guideline for optimization of surgical and pathological quality performance for radical prostatectomy in prostate cancer management: evidentiary base.

Authors:  Joseph L Chin; John Srigley; Linda A Mayhew; R Bryan Rumble; Claire Crossley; Amber Hunter; Neil Fleshner; Bish Bora; Robin McLeod; Sheila McNair; Bernard Langer; Andrew Evans
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.862

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.