Literature DB >> 21287197

Robot-assisted prostatectomy: the new standard of care.

Gencay Hatiboglu1, Dogu Teber, Markus Hohenfellner.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) has first been performed in 2000 and has since then become a widespread and often performed therapy option for surgical treatment of prostate cancer. The purpose of this review was to highlight the current clinical concepts for radical prostatectomy. DISCUSSION AND
CONCLUSIONS: Actual literature search was performed in PubMed database and reviewed. Different surgical techniques for RARP are presented. Oncologic and functional outcomes of RARP are discussed and compared to radical retropubic prostatectomy. In conclusion, RARP has equal oncologic and functional outcome in localized prostate cancer. RARP as a less invasive treatment option for patients with localized prostate cancer should be considered as a new standard of care by now.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21287197     DOI: 10.1007/s00423-011-0743-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg        ISSN: 1435-2443            Impact factor:   3.445


  69 in total

1.  Robot-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy: a comparison of one surgeon's outcomes.

Authors:  Thomas E Ahlering; David Woo; Louis Eichel; David I Lee; Robert Edwards; Douglas W Skarecky
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.649

2.  A prospective trial comparing consecutive series of open retropubic and robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in a centre with a limited caseload.

Authors:  Giovanni B Di Pierro; Philipp Baumeister; Patrick Stucki; Josef Beatrice; Hansjörg Danuser; Agostino Mattei
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2010-10-21       Impact factor: 20.096

3.  Robotic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: an alternative approach.

Authors:  J V Joseph; R Rosenbaum; R Madeb; E Erturk; H R H Patel
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  The discovery of the cavernous nerves and development of nerve sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy.

Authors:  Patrick Craig Walsh
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 5.  Techniques of nerve-sparing and potency outcomes following robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy.

Authors:  Sanket Chauhan; Rafael F Coelho; Bernardo Rocco; Kenneth J Palmer; Marcelo A Orvieto; Vipul R Patel
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2010 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.541

6.  The learning curve for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: an international multicenter study.

Authors:  Fernando P Secin; Caroline Savage; Claude Abbou; Alexandre de La Taille; Laurent Salomon; Jens Rassweiler; Marcel Hruza; François Rozet; Xavier Cathelineau; Gunther Janetschek; Faissal Nassar; Ingolf Turk; Alex J Vanni; Inderbir S Gill; Philippe Koenig; Jihad H Kaouk; Luis Martinez Pineiro; Vito Pansadoro; Paolo Emiliozzi; Anders Bjartell; Thomas Jiborn; Christopher Eden; Andrew J Richards; Roland Van Velthoven; Jens-Uwe Stolzenburg; Robert Rabenalt; Li-Ming Su; Christian P Pavlovich; Adam W Levinson; Karim A Touijer; Andrew Vickers; Bertrand Guillonneau
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2010-10-16       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  A prospective, non-randomized trial comparing robot-assisted laparoscopic and retropubic radical prostatectomy in one European institution.

Authors:  Vincenzo Ficarra; Giacomo Novara; Simonetta Fracalanza; Carolina D'Elia; Silvia Secco; Massimo Iafrate; Stefano Cavalleri; Walter Artibani
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2009-03-05       Impact factor: 5.588

8.  Radical prostatectomy versus watchful waiting in localized prostate cancer: the Scandinavian prostate cancer group-4 randomized trial.

Authors:  Anna Bill-Axelson; Lars Holmberg; Frej Filén; Mirja Ruutu; Hans Garmo; Christer Busch; Stig Nordling; Michael Häggman; Swen-Olof Andersson; Stefan Bratell; Anders Spångberg; Juni Palmgren; Hans-Olov Adami; Jan-Erik Johansson
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2008-08-11       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 9.  Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: advances since 2005.

Authors:  Li-Ming Su
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.309

Review 10.  Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: a review of current outcomes.

Authors:  Rafael F Coelho; Sanket Chauhan; Kenneth J Palmer; Bernardo Rocco; Manoj B Patel; Vipul R Patel
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2009-10-05       Impact factor: 5.588

View more
  2 in total

1.  [Minimally invasive vs. open surgical procedures in the treatment of prostate cancer].

Authors:  M Wirth; M Fröhner
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  The efficacy and utilisation of preoperative multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: does it change the surgical dissection plan?

Authors:  Hasan Hüseyin Tavukçu; Ömer Aytaç; Numan Cem Balcı; Haluk Kulaksızoğlu; Fatih Atuğ
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2017-12-01
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.