Literature DB >> 24951675

Toward microendoscopic electrical impedance tomography for intraoperative surgical margin assessment.

Ryan J Halter, Young-Joong Kim.   

Abstract

No clinical protocols are routinely used to intraoperatively assess surgical margin status during prostate surgery. Instead, margins are evaluated through pathological assessment of the prostate following radical prostatectomy, when it is too late to provide additional surgical intervention. An intraoperative device potentially capable of assessing surgical margin status based on the electrical property contrast between benign and malignant prostate tissue has been developed. Specifically, a microendoscopic electrical impedance tomography (EIT) probe has been constructed to sense and image, at near millimeter resolution, the conductivity contrast within heterogeneous biological tissues with the goal of providing surgeons with real-time assessment of margin pathologies. This device consists of a ring of eight 0.6-mm diameter electrodes embedded in a 5-mm diameter probe tip to enable access through a 12-mm laparoscopic port. Experiments were performed to evaluate the volume of tissue sensed by the probe. The probe was also tested with inclusions in gelatin, as well as on a sample of porcine tissue with clearly defined regions of adipose and muscle. The probe's area of sensitivity consists of a circular area of 9.1 mm(2) and the maximum depth of sensitivity is approximately 1.5 mm. The probe is able to distinguish between high contrast muscle and adipose tissue on a sub-mm scale (∼500 μm). These preliminary results suggest that EIT is possible in a probe designed to fit within a 12-mm laparoscopic access port.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24951675      PMCID: PMC4556647          DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2014.2329461

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0018-9294            Impact factor:   4.538


  44 in total

1.  Three-dimensional electrical impedance tomography based on the complete electrode model.

Authors:  P J Vauhkonen; M Vauhkonen; T Savolainen; J P Kaipio
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.538

2.  Distinguishability in impedance imaging.

Authors:  M Cheney; D Isaacson
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 4.538

3.  Non-invasive and microinvasive electrical impedance spectra of skin cancer - a comparison between two techniques.

Authors:  Peter Aberg; Paul Geladi; Ingrid Nicander; Johan Hansson; Ulf Holmgren; Stig Ollmar
Journal:  Skin Res Technol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.365

4.  Prognostic impact of positive surgical margins in surgically treated prostate cancer: multi-institutional assessment of 5831 patients.

Authors:  Pierre I Karakiewicz; James A Eastham; Markus Graefen; Ilias Cagiannos; Phillip D Stricker; Eric Klein; Thomas Cangiano; Fritz H Schröder; Peter T Scardino; Michael W Kattan
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.649

5.  Temperature field estimation using electrical impedance profiling methods. I. Reconstruction algorithm and simulated results.

Authors:  K D Paulsen; M J Moskowitz; T P Ryan
Journal:  Int J Hyperthermia       Date:  1994 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.914

6.  Electrical impedance spectroscopy of benign and malignant prostatic tissues.

Authors:  Ryan J Halter; Alan Schned; John Heaney; Alex Hartov; Shannon Schutz; Keith D Paulsen
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-03-04       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Multiphoton microscopy of prostate and periprostatic neural tissue: a promising imaging technique for improving nerve-sparing prostatectomy.

Authors:  Rajiv Yadav; Sushmita Mukherjee; Michael Hermen; Gerald Tan; Frederick R Maxfield; Watt W Webb; Ashutosh K Tewari
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 2.942

8.  Electrical impedance spectroscopy and the diagnosis of bladder pathology: a pilot study.

Authors:  B A Wilkinson; R H Smallwood; A Keshtar; J A Lee; F C Hamdy
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Assessment of electrical impedance endotomography for hardware specification.

Authors:  J Jossinet; A Fournier-Desseux; A Matias
Journal:  Biomed Imaging Interv J       Date:  2006-04-01

10.  Label-free high-resolution imaging of prostate glands and cavernous nerves using coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering microscopy.

Authors:  Liang Gao; Haijun Zhou; Michael J Thrall; Fuhai Li; Yaliang Yang; Zhiyong Wang; Pengfei Luo; Kelvin K Wong; Ganesh S Palapattu; Stephen T C Wong
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2011-03-18       Impact factor: 3.732

View more
  2 in total

1.  Healthy and tumoral tissue resistivity in wild-type and sparc-/- animal models.

Authors:  D Meroni; G Mauri; D Bovio; A M Bianchi; C Chiodoni; M P Colombo; E Meroni; A Aliverti
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Design of a Drop-in EBI Sensor Probe for Abnormal Tissue Detection in Minimally Invasive Surgery.

Authors:  Guanming Zhu; Liang Zhou; Shilong Wang; Pengjie Lin; Jing Guo; Shuting Cai; Xiaoming Xiong; Xiaobing Jiang; Zhuoqi Cheng
Journal:  J Electr Bioimpedance       Date:  2020-12-31
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.