Literature DB >> 11030868

Complications of laparoscopic splenectomy.

E M Targarona1, J J Espert, E Bombuy, O Vidal, G Cerdán, V Artigas, M Trías.   

Abstract

HYPOTHESIS: Analysis of the type and characteristics of complications after laparoscopic splenectomy may permit the identification of clinical factors with predictive value for the development of complications.
DESIGN: Univariate and multivariate analysis of factors related to complications in a prospective series of laparoscopic splenectomies.
SETTING: A large tertiary referral university-teaching general hospital. PATIENTS: One hundred twenty-two nonselected consecutive patients, in whom laparoscopic splenectomy was attempted between February 1993 and July 1999. INTERVENTION: Laparoscopic splenectomy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Immediate complications classified according to the Clavien score. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed of complications related to age, sex, body mass index, and malignant nature of the hematologic disease; preoperative hematocrit and platelet count; operative time; operative position; need of accessory incision; transfusion status; learning curve; and existence of comorbid diseases.
RESULTS: One hundred thirteen laparoscopic splenectomies were completed (conversion rate, 7.4%). Twenty patients (18%) developed 23 complications. All were Clavien type I or II, without mortality. One complication was intraoperative (diaphragmatic perforation), and 22 were postoperative: 6 pulmonary (26%), 3 fever (13%), 8 hemorrhagic (35%) (5 episodes of postoperative bleeding and 3 abdominal wall hematomas), and 6 others (26%). Ten (43%) of the 23 were technically related. Univariate analysis showed that complications were only related to age (mean +/- SD, 55 +/- 15 vs 39 +/- 17 years; P<.008) or transfusion (50% vs 11%; P<.001). Multivariate analysis showed that the learning curve (P<.005; 95% confidence interval, 2.46), age (P<.001; 95% confidence interval, 1. 04), spleen weight (P<.009; 95% confidence interval, 1.00), and malignant neoplasm diagnosis (P<.007; 95% confidence interval, 3.82) were independent predictors of complications.
CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic splenectomy is feasible, and the incidence of severe complications is reduced. However, a high proportion of these complications are technique related. Laparoscopic splenectomy requires great technical care but offers major clinical advantages, even in less favorable situations, such as in patients with splenomegaly or with malignant neoplasms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11030868     DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.135.10.1137

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Surg        ISSN: 0004-0010


  15 in total

1.  Laparoscopic splenectomy for hematologic diseases: a preliminary analysis performed on the Italian Registry of Laparoscopic Surgery of the Spleen (IRLSS).

Authors:  M Casaccia; P Torelli; S Squarcia; M P Sormani; A Savelli; B Troilo; G Santori; U Valente
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-07-03       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Laparoscopic splenectomy: perioperative management, surgical technique, and results.

Authors:  P Marco Fisichella; Yee M Wong; Sam G Pappas; Gerard J Abood
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-10-10       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  High incidence of thrombosis of the portal venous system after laparoscopic splenectomy: a prospective study with contrast-enhanced CT scan.

Authors:  Masataka Ikeda; Mitsugu Sekimoto; Shuji Takiguchi; Masaru Kubota; Masakazu Ikenaga; Hirofumi Yamamoto; Yoshiyuki Fujiwara; Masayuki Ohue; Takushi Yasuda; Hiroshi Imamura; Masayuki Tatsuta; Masahiko Yano; Hiroshi Furukawa; Morito Monden
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Assessment of complications after pancreatic surgery: A novel grading system applied to 633 patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Michelle L DeOliveira; Jordan M Winter; Markus Schafer; Steven C Cunningham; John L Cameron; Charles J Yeo; Pierre-Alain Clavien
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Portomesenteric vein thrombosis after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy.

Authors:  José Salinas; Diego Barros; Napoleón Salgado; Germán Viscido; Ricardo Funke; Gustavo Pérez; Fernando Pimentel; Camilo Boza
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Systemic inflammatory response syndrome after hand-assisted laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy.

Authors:  Takeyuki Misawa; Hiroaki Shiba; Teruyuki Usuba; Takuya Nojiri; Kumiko Kitajima; Tadashi Uwagawa; Yoichi Toyama; Yuichi Ishida; Yuji Ishii; Akira Yanagisawa; Susumu Kobayashi; Katsuhiko Yanaga
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-06-26       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Delayed traumatic diaphragmatic hernia after open splenectomy: report of a case.

Authors:  Kazuto Tsuboi; Nobuo Omura; Hideyuki Kashiwagi; Naruo Kawasaki; Yutaka Suzuki; Katsuhiko Yanaga
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2008-03-27       Impact factor: 2.549

8.  Results of laparoscopic splenectomy for treatment of malignant conditions.

Authors:  E M Targarona; G Cerdán; E Gracia; M Rodríguez; M Trias
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.647

9.  Laparoscopic splenectomy: clip ligation or en-bloc stapling?

Authors:  Ahmet Türkoğlu; Abdullah Oğuz; Gizem Yaman; Mesut Gül; Burak Veli Ülger
Journal:  Turk J Surg       Date:  2019-12-16

10.  Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey.

Authors:  Daniel Dindo; Nicolas Demartines; Pierre-Alain Clavien
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 12.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.