BACKGROUND: Quality of health care and safety have been emphasized by various professional and governmental groups. However, no standardized method exists for grading and reporting complications in orthopaedic surgery. Conclusions regarding outcomes are incomplete without a standardized, objective complication grading scheme applied concurrently. The general surgery literature has the Clavien-Dindo classification that meets the above criteria. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We asked whether a previously reported classification would show high intraobserver and interobserver reliabilities when modified for orthopaedic surgery specifically looking at hip preservation surgery. We therefore determined the interreader and intrareader reliabilities of the adapted classification scheme as applied to hip preservation surgery. METHODS: We adapted the validated Clavien-Dindo complication classification system and tested its reliability for orthopaedic surgery, specifically hip preservation surgery. There are five grades based on the treatment required to manage the complication and the potential for long-term morbidity. Forty-four complication scenarios were created from a prospective multicenter database of hip preservation procedures and from the literature. Ten readers who perform hip surgery at eight centers in three countries graded the scenarios at two different times. Fleiss' and Cohen's κ statistics were performed for interobserver and intraobserver reliabilities, respectively. RESULTS: The overall Fleiss' κ value for interobserver reliability was 0.887 (95% CI, 0.855-0.891). The weighted κ was 0.925 (95% CI, 0.894-0.956) for Grade I, 0.838 (95% CI, 0.807-0.869) for Grade II, 0.87 (95% CI, 0.835-0.866) for Grade III, and 0.898 (95% CI, 0.866-0.929) for Grade IV. The Cohen's κ value for intraobserver reliability was 0.891 (95% CI, 0.857-0.925). CONCLUSIONS: The adapted classification system shows high interobserver and intraobserver reliabilities for grading of complications when applied to orthopaedic surgery looking at complications of hip preservation surgery. This grading scheme may facilitate standardization of complication reporting and make outcome studies more comparable.
BACKGROUND: Quality of health care and safety have been emphasized by various professional and governmental groups. However, no standardized method exists for grading and reporting complications in orthopaedic surgery. Conclusions regarding outcomes are incomplete without a standardized, objective complication grading scheme applied concurrently. The general surgery literature has the Clavien-Dindo classification that meets the above criteria. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We asked whether a previously reported classification would show high intraobserver and interobserver reliabilities when modified for orthopaedic surgery specifically looking at hip preservation surgery. We therefore determined the interreader and intrareader reliabilities of the adapted classification scheme as applied to hip preservation surgery. METHODS: We adapted the validated Clavien-Dindo complication classification system and tested its reliability for orthopaedic surgery, specifically hip preservation surgery. There are five grades based on the treatment required to manage the complication and the potential for long-term morbidity. Forty-four complication scenarios were created from a prospective multicenter database of hip preservation procedures and from the literature. Ten readers who perform hip surgery at eight centers in three countries graded the scenarios at two different times. Fleiss' and Cohen's κ statistics were performed for interobserver and intraobserver reliabilities, respectively. RESULTS: The overall Fleiss' κ value for interobserver reliability was 0.887 (95% CI, 0.855-0.891). The weighted κ was 0.925 (95% CI, 0.894-0.956) for Grade I, 0.838 (95% CI, 0.807-0.869) for Grade II, 0.87 (95% CI, 0.835-0.866) for Grade III, and 0.898 (95% CI, 0.866-0.929) for Grade IV. The Cohen's κ value for intraobserver reliability was 0.891 (95% CI, 0.857-0.925). CONCLUSIONS: The adapted classification system shows high interobserver and intraobserver reliabilities for grading of complications when applied to orthopaedic surgery looking at complications of hip preservation surgery. This grading scheme may facilitate standardization of complication reporting and make outcome studies more comparable.
Authors: Sompol Permpongkosol; Richard E Link; Li-Ming Su; Frederico R Romero; Herman S Bagga; Christian P Pavlovich; Thomas W Jarrett; Louis R Kavoussi Journal: J Urol Date: 2007-02 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Ernest L Sink; Paul E Beaulé; Daniel Sucato; Young-Jo Kim; Michael B Millis; Michael Dayton; Robert T Trousdale; Rafael J Sierra; Ira Zaltz; Perry Schoenecker; Amy Monreal; John Clohisy Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2011-06-15 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Norman Espinosa; Martin Beck; Dominique A Rothenfluh; Reinhold Ganz; Michael Leunig Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2007-03 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Michelle L DeOliveira; Jordan M Winter; Markus Schafer; Steven C Cunningham; John L Cameron; Charles J Yeo; Pierre-Alain Clavien Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2006-12 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Martin Beck; Michael Leunig; Javad Parvizi; Vincent Boutier; Daniel Wyss; Reinhold Ganz Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2004-01 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: C P Sundaram; G L Martin; A Guise; J Bernie; V Bargman; M Milgrom; A Shalhav; M Govani; W Goggins Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2007-03-02 Impact factor: 3.453
Authors: Simon D Steppacher; Helen Anwander; Corinne A Zurmühle; Moritz Tannast; Klaus A Siebenrock Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2015-04 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Kai Ziebarth; Milan Milosevic; Till D Lerch; Simon D Steppacher; Theddy Slongo; Klaus A Siebenrock Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2017-04 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Ernest L Sink; Peter D Fabricant; Zhaoxing Pan; Michael R Dayton; Eduardo Novais Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2013-05-08 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: William L Healy; Richard Iorio; Andrew J Clair; Vincent D Pellegrini; Craig J Della Valle; Keith R Berend Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2016-02 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: David N Naumann; Laura E Vincent; Nicola Pearson; Alastair Beaven; Iain M Smith; Kieran Smith; Emma Toman; Helen R Dorrance; Keith Porter; Charles E Wade; Bryan A Cotton; John B Holcomb; Mark J Midwinter Journal: J Trauma Acute Care Surg Date: 2017-08 Impact factor: 3.313
Authors: John C Clohisy; Jeffrey J Nepple; James R Ross; Gail Pashos; Perry L Schoenecker Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2015-04 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Michael P McClincy; James D Wylie; Young-Jo Kim; Michael B Millis; Eduardo N Novais Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2019-05 Impact factor: 4.176