Literature DB >> 22449724

Variable impact of complications in general surgery: a prospective cohort study.

Eelke Bosma1, Eelco J Veen, Mariska A C de Jongh, Jan A Roukema.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Registering complications is important in surgery, since complications serve as outcome measures and indicators of quality of care. Few studies have addressed the variation in severity and consequences of complications. We hypothesized that complications show much variation in consequences and severity.
METHODS: We conducted a prospective observational cohort study to evaluate consequences and severity of complications in surgical practice. All recorded complications of patients admitted to our hospital between June 1, 2005, and Dec. 31, 2007, were prospectively recorded in an electronic database. Complications were classified according to the system of the Trauma Registry of the American College of Surgeons. We graded the severity of complications according to the system proposed by Clavien and colleagues, and the consequences of each complication were registered.
RESULTS: During the study period, 3418 complications were recorded; consequences and severity were recorded in 89% of them. Of 3026 complications, 987 (33%) were grade I, 781 (26%) were grade IIa, 1020 (34%) were grade IIb, 150 (5%) were grade III and 88 (3%) were grade IV. The consequences and severity of identically registered complications showed a large degree of variation, best illustrated by wound infections, which were grade I in 50%, grade IIa in 22%, grade IIb in 28% and grade III and IV in 0.3% of patients.
CONCLUSION: Severity should be routinely presented when reporting complications in clinical practice and surgical research papers to adequately compare quality of care and results of clinical trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22449724      PMCID: PMC3364303          DOI: 10.1503/cjs.027810

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Surg        ISSN: 0008-428X            Impact factor:   2.089


  26 in total

1.  Defining and classifying clinical indicators for quality improvement.

Authors:  Jan Mainz
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.038

2.  Proposed classification of complications of surgery with examples of utility in cholecystectomy.

Authors:  P A Clavien; J R Sanabria; S M Strasberg
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 3.982

3.  Variation in hospital mortality associated with inpatient surgery.

Authors:  Amir A Ghaferi; John D Birkmeyer; Justin B Dimick
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-10-01       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Risk factors for prolonged length of stay after major elective surgery.

Authors:  T C Collins; J Daley; W H Henderson; S F Khuri
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  [Registration of postoperative complications to improve the results of surgery].

Authors:  J A Roukema; C van der Werken; L P Leenen
Journal:  Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd       Date:  1996-04-06

6.  Measuring postoperative complications in general surgery patients using an outcomes-based strategy: comparison with complications presented at morbidity and mortality rounds.

Authors:  L Feldman; J Barkun; A Barkun; J Sampalis; L Rosenberg
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 3.982

Review 7.  The measurement and monitoring of surgical adverse events.

Authors:  J Bruce; E M Russell; J Mollison; Z H Krukowski
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.014

8.  Wound infection after elective colorectal resection.

Authors:  Robert L Smith; Jamie K Bohl; Shannon T McElearney; Charles M Friel; Margaret M Barclay; Robert G Sawyer; Eugene F Foley
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Excess length of stay, charges, and mortality attributable to medical injuries during hospitalization.

Authors:  Chunliu Zhan; Marlene R Miller
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-10-08       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey.

Authors:  Daniel Dindo; Nicolas Demartines; Pierre-Alain Clavien
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Wearable devices for patient monitoring in the early postoperative period: a literature review.

Authors:  Tajrian Amin; Ralph J Mobbs; Niyaz Mostafa; Luke W Sy; Wen Jie Choy
Journal:  Mhealth       Date:  2021-07-20

Review 2.  Systematic review of hospital-wide complication registries.

Authors:  I Saarinen; A Malmivaara; R Miikki; A Kaipia
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2018-07-27

3.  Clavien-Dindo classification for grading complications after total pharyngolaryngectomy and free jejunum transfer.

Authors:  Shimpei Miyamoto; Junichi Nakao; Takuya Higashino; Seiichi Yoshimoto; Ryuichi Hayashi; Minoru Sakuraba
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-09-12       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Trial of remote continuous versus intermittent NEWS monitoring after major surgery (TRaCINg): a feasibility randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  C L Downey; J Croft; G Ainsworth; H Buckley; B Shinkins; R Randell; J M Brown; D G Jayne
Journal:  Pilot Feasibility Stud       Date:  2020-11-23
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.