Literature DB >> 17103269

Pharyngolaryngoesophagectomy using the thoracoscopic approach.

H A Cense1, S Law, W Wei, L-K Lam, W-M Ng, K-H Wong, K-F Kwok, J Wong.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Thoracoscopic mobilization of the esophagus for pharyngolaryngoesophagectomy allows dissection under direct vision, and therefore it potentially results in fewer complications than conventional transhiatal mobilization. In this article we report our experience with this approach. It was also hypothesized that a learning curve existed and that results have improved over time. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From July 1994 until January 2004, 57 patients underwent pharyngolaryngoesophagectomy in our institution. Intraoperative events and postoperative outcome were prospectively documented, and long-term follow-up data were also studied. Results were compared between the first 30 patients and the last 27 patients.
RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the two groups with respect to the various clinicopathological characteristics. There was no difference in the median thoracoscopic time between the first 30 and last 27 patients at 90 and 75 min, respectively, p = 0.18. For the complete procedure there was significantly less blood loss in the later group; median (range) blood loss 700 (164-3000) ml versus 400 (100-1200) ml, p = 0.002. Overall pulmonary complications occurred in 12 patients (40%) in the first group versus 13 (48%) in the second group, p = 0.6. The incidence of atrial arrhythmia was also similar, affecting 6 (20%) patients and 3 (11%), respectively, p = 0.47. Hospital mortality rates were 13.3% and 7.4%, p = 0.67. Two-year survival rates were no different (46% versus 45% p = 0.85).
CONCLUSIONS: Although, subjectively, operating skills have improved over time, better results in the second half of this series could not be demonstrated clearly, likely because the operating surgeons had prior extensive experience in esophageal and thoracoscopic procedures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17103269     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-006-9049-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  20 in total

1.  Hospital volume and hospital mortality for esophagectomy.

Authors:  J J van Lanschot; J B Hulscher; C J Buskens; H W Tilanus; F J ten Kate; H Obertop
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2001-04-15       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Effect of operative volume on morbidity, mortality, and hospital use after esophagectomy for cancer.

Authors:  S G Swisher; L Deford; K W Merriman; G L Walsh; R Smythe; A Vaporicyan; J A Ajani; T Brown; R Komaki; J A Roth; J B Putnam
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 5.209

Review 3.  High volume centers for esophagectomy: what is the number needed to achieve low postoperative mortality?

Authors:  R Metzger; E Bollschweiler; D Vallböhmer; M Maish; T R DeMeester; A H Hölscher
Journal:  Dis Esophagus       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.429

4.  Effect of surgical experience on results of esophagectomy for esophageal carcinoma.

Authors:  J D Miller; M K Jain; C J de Gara; D Morgan; J D Urschel
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 3.454

5.  Current status of pharyngolaryngo-esophagectomy and pharyngogastric anastomosis.

Authors:  W I Wei; L K Lam; P W Yuen; J Wong
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 3.147

6.  Minimal invasive approach of gastric and esophageal mobilization in total pharyngolaryngoesophagectomy: total laparoscopic and hand-assisted laparoscopic technique.

Authors:  S K H Wong; A C W Chan; D W H Lee; E W H To; E K W Ng; S C S Chung
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-02-17       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Influence of thoracic epidural analgesia on outcome after resection for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  A Watson; P R Allen
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 3.982

8.  Extended transthoracic resection compared with limited transhiatal resection for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus.

Authors:  Jan B F Hulscher; Johanna W van Sandick; Angela G E M de Boer; Bas P L Wijnhoven; Jan G P Tijssen; Paul Fockens; Peep F M Stalmeier; Fiebo J W ten Kate; Herman van Dekken; Huug Obertop; Hugo W Tilanus; J Jan B van Lanschot
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-11-21       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Pleural drainage after transthoracic esophagectomy: experience with a vacuum system.

Authors:  Simon Law; Jir-Ping Boey; Ka-Fai Kwok; Kam-Ho Wong; Kent-Man Chu; John Wong
Journal:  Dis Esophagus       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.429

10.  A comparison of video-assisted thoracoscopic oesophagectomy and radical lymph node dissection for squamous cell cancer of the oesophagus with open operation.

Authors:  H Osugi; M Takemura; M Higashino; N Takada; S Lee; H Kinoshita
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 6.939

View more
  6 in total

1.  Current management of cervical esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Daniel King Hung Tong; Simon Law; Dora Lai Wan Kwong; William I Wei; Raymond Wai Man Ng; Kam Ho Wong
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Clinical Assessment of Reconstruction Involving Gastric Pull-Up Combined with Free Jejunal Graft After Total Pharyngolaryngoesophagectomy.

Authors:  Hiroshi Miyata; Keijiro Sugimura; Masaaki Motoori; Yoshiyuki Fujiwara; Takeshi Omori; Masahiro Mun; Masayuki Ohue; Masayoshi Yasui; Norikatsu Miyoshi; Takashi Fujii; Hiroki Tajima; Tomoyuki Kurita; Masahiko Yano
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Oncological outcomes of cervical esophageal cancer treated primarily with surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Armando De Virgilio; Andrea Costantino; Carlo Castoro; Giuseppe Spriano; Bianca Maria Festa; Giuseppe Mercante; Davide Franceschini; Ciro Franzese; Marta Scorsetti; Andrea Marrari; Raffaele Cavina; Salvatore Marano
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2022-08-15       Impact factor: 3.236

Review 4.  [Limitations of surgery for cancer of the upper gastrointestinal tract].

Authors:  E Karakas; C Oetzmann von Sochaczewski; T Haist; M Pauthner; D Lorenz
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 5.  Surgical strategies for esophageal cancer associated with head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Masaru Morita; Hiroshi Saeki; Shuhei Ito; Yasue Kimura; Nami Yamashita; Koji Ando; Yukiharu Hiyoshi; Eriko Tokunaga; Eiji Oki; Tetsuo Ikeda; Sei Yoshida; Torahiko Nakashima; Yoshihiko Maehara
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 2.549

6.  Minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer in the People's Republic of China: an overview.

Authors:  Chengchu Zhu; Ketao Jin
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2013-03-03       Impact factor: 4.147

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.