Literature DB >> 15209747

Pleural drainage after transthoracic esophagectomy: experience with a vacuum system.

Simon Law1, Jir-Ping Boey, Ka-Fai Kwok, Kam-Ho Wong, Kent-Man Chu, John Wong.   

Abstract

Conventional pleural cavity drainage after esophagectomy involves one to two large-bore drainage tubes connected to underwater bottles. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the use of a small mobile vacuum drainage system. Out of 173 patients who underwent transthoracic esophagectomy, 167 (97%) had the vacuum drain successfully placed at the end of the operation. Of those, use of the vacuum drain was uneventful for 131 until its removal (78%). Air leaks necessitating connection to underwater drainage occurred in 34 patients (20%), but in 26 of them this was only temporary. Overall success was therefore achieved in 157 patients (94%). Median in-situ placement of the vacuum drain was 4 days, and 85% of patients had their drains removed by the seventh postoperative day. The presence of lung adhesions significantly increased the need for underwater drainage. Postoperative outcomes were no different from a historical cohort with conventional underwater drainage. No drain-related complications were reported. The vacuum drain is an alternative to the conventional, large-bore, chest tube system after transthoracic esophagectomy. Copyright 2004 ISDE

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15209747     DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2004.00380.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Esophagus        ISSN: 1120-8694            Impact factor:   3.429


  7 in total

1.  Transhiatal chest drainage after oesophagectomy.

Authors:  P Gogalniceanu; K Crewdson; A Z Khan; A J Botha
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  Risk factors associated with increased drainage volumes of chest tubes after transthoracic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Ryo Kato; Tomoki Makino; Makoto Yamasaki; Koji Tanaka; Yasuhiro Miyazaki; Tsuyoshi Takahashi; Yukinori Kurokawa; Masaaki Motoori; Yutaka Kimura; Kiyokazu Nakajima; Masaki Mori; Yuichiro Doki
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2019-07-24       Impact factor: 2.549

3.  Pharyngolaryngoesophagectomy using the thoracoscopic approach.

Authors:  H A Cense; S Law; W Wei; L-K Lam; W-M Ng; K-H Wong; K-F Kwok; J Wong
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-11-14       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Predictive factors for postoperative pulmonary complications and mortality after esophagectomy for cancer.

Authors:  Simon Law; Kam-Ho Wong; Ka-Fai Kwok; Kent-Man Chu; John Wong
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Esophagectomy without mortality: what can surgeons do?

Authors:  Simon Law
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-09-23       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Postoperative pulmonary complications and thoracocentesis associated with early versus late chest tube removal after thoracic esophagectomy with three-field dissection: a propensity score matching analysis.

Authors:  Takuji Sato; Takeo Fujita; Naoya Okada; Hisashi Fujiwara; Takashi Kojima; Ryuichi Hayashi; Hiroyuki Daiko
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2018-07-17       Impact factor: 2.549

7.  Transhiatal chest drainage in mediastinoscope and laparoscope-assisted esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Katsuji Hisakura; Koichi Ogawa; Yoshimasa Akashi; Jaejeong Kim; Shoko Moue; Yusuke Ohara; Yohei Owada; Shinji Hashimoto; Tsuyoshi Enomoto; Tatsuya Oda
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2022-08-24       Impact factor: 1.522

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.