Literature DB >> 15569369

High volume centers for esophagectomy: what is the number needed to achieve low postoperative mortality?

R Metzger1, E Bollschweiler, D Vallböhmer, M Maish, T R DeMeester, A H Hölscher.   

Abstract

Aimed at reducing surgical deaths, several initiatives have attempted to establish volume-based referral strategies in high risk surgery. The detailed analysis of the literature of the last 10 years, comprising 13 papers on esophageal cancer, shows a clear reduction in postoperative mortality with increasing case volumes per year. Single papers have analyzed the main reasons for this phenomenon and showed that postoperative complication rates are lower in high-volume hospitals and management of complications is more successful. Further, long-term prognosis is also correlated to case-volume. In conclusion, the analysis shows that only with the experience of more than 20 esophagectomies per year can a significant reduction of the mortality, down to 4.9%, be achieved. Based on this survey, surgery of esophageal cancer is a task for high-volume hospitals because of decreased postoperative mortality and improved long-term prognosis compared with low volume hospitals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15569369     DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2004.00431.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Esophagus        ISSN: 1120-8694            Impact factor:   3.429


  59 in total

1.  The effect of surgical volume and the provision of residency and fellowship training on complications of major hepatic resection.

Authors:  Geoffrey Paul Kohn; Mehrdad Nikfarjam
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-09-08       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Applicability and feasibility of incorporating minimally invasive esophagectomy at a high volume center.

Authors:  Brittany L Willer; Sumeet K Mittal; Stephanie G Worrell; Seemal Mumtaz; Tommy H Lee
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Modeling the cost-effectiveness of strategies for treating esophageal adenocarcinoma and high-grade dysplasia.

Authors:  Louisa G Gordon; Nicholas G Hirst; George C Mayne; David I Watson; Timothy Bright; Wang Cai; Andrew P Barbour; Bernard M Smithers; David C Whiteman; Simon Eckermann
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Perioperative outcomes of esophageal cancer surgery in a mid-volume institution in the era of centralization.

Authors:  Silvio Däster; Savas D Soysal; Luca Koechlin; Lea Stoll; Ralph Peterli; Markus von Flüe; Christoph Ackermann
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 3.445

5.  Patient Selection for Oesophagectomy: Impact of Age and Comorbidities on Outcome.

Authors:  Gregory O'Grady; Ahmer M Hameed; Tony C Pang; Emma Johnston; Vincent T Lam; Arthur J Richardson; Michael J Hollands
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  [Preoperative evaluation of prognostic factors in esophageal squamous cell cancer].

Authors:  P M Schneider; D Vallböhmer; J Brabender; A H Hölscher
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 0.955

7.  Consensus statements for management of Barrett's dysplasia and early-stage esophageal adenocarcinoma, based on a Delphi process.

Authors:  Cathy Bennett; Nimish Vakil; Jacques Bergman; Rebecca Harrison; Robert Odze; Michael Vieth; Scott Sanders; Laura Gay; Oliver Pech; Gaius Longcroft-Wheaton; Yvonne Romero; John Inadomi; Jan Tack; Douglas A Corley; Hendrik Manner; Susi Green; David Al Dulaimi; Haythem Ali; Bill Allum; Mark Anderson; Howard Curtis; Gary Falk; M Brian Fennerty; Grant Fullarton; Kausilia Krishnadath; Stephen J Meltzer; David Armstrong; Robert Ganz; Gianpaolo Cengia; James J Going; John Goldblum; Charles Gordon; Heike Grabsch; Chris Haigh; Michio Hongo; David Johnston; Ricky Forbes-Young; Elaine Kay; Philip Kaye; Toni Lerut; Laurence B Lovat; Lars Lundell; Philip Mairs; Tadakuza Shimoda; Stuart Spechler; Stephen Sontag; Peter Malfertheiner; Iain Murray; Manoj Nanji; David Poller; Krish Ragunath; Jaroslaw Regula; Renzo Cestari; Neil Shepherd; Rajvinder Singh; Hubert J Stein; Nicholas J Talley; Jean-Paul Galmiche; Tony C K Tham; Peter Watson; Lisa Yerian; Massimo Rugge; Thomas W Rice; John Hart; Stuart Gittens; David Hewin; Juergen Hochberger; Peter Kahrilas; Sean Preston; Richard Sampliner; Prateek Sharma; Robert Stuart; Kenneth Wang; Irving Waxman; Chris Abley; Duncan Loft; Ian Penman; Nicholas J Shaheen; Amitabh Chak; Gareth Davies; Lorna Dunn; Yngve Falck-Ytter; John Decaestecker; Pradeep Bhandari; Christian Ell; S Michael Griffin; Stephen Attwood; Hugh Barr; John Allen; Mark K Ferguson; Paul Moayyedi; Janusz A Z Jankowski
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 22.682

8.  Esophagectomy--it's not just about mortality anymore: standardized perioperative clinical pathways improve outcomes in patients with esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Donald E Low; Sonia Kunz; Drew Schembre; Henry Otero; Tom Malpass; Alex Hsi; Guobin Song; Richard Hinke; Richard A Kozarek
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2007-08-31       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Evolution of standardized clinical pathways: refining multidisciplinary care and process to improve outcomes of the surgical treatment of esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Sheraz R Markar; Henner Schmidt; Sonia Kunz; Artur Bodnar; Michal Hubka; Donald E Low
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 3.452

10.  Mortality after esophagectomy is heavily impacted by center volume: retrospective analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample.

Authors:  Hans F Fuchs; Cristina R Harnsberger; Ryan C Broderick; David C Chang; Bryan J Sandler; Garth R Jacobsen; Michael Bouvet; Santiago Horgan
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.