Literature DB >> 11301408

Hospital volume and hospital mortality for esophagectomy.

J J van Lanschot1, J B Hulscher, C J Buskens, H W Tilanus, F J ten Kate, H Obertop.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hospital mortality after esophagectomy has decreased from 29% to 7.5% over the last decades because of improved surgical techniques and better perioperative care. Suggestions have been made that a further decrease in hospital mortality may be achieved by centralization of esophagectomies in high volume centers.
METHODS: The effect of hospital volume on hospital mortality after esophagectomy in the Netherlands was analyzed based on data from the Dutch National Medical Registry and the Dutch Network and National Database for Pathology over the period 1993-1998.
RESULTS: Annually, approximately 310 (range, 264-321) esophagectomies are performed in the Netherlands. Fifty-two percent are performed in 43-55 low volume centers (1-10 resections a year). Six percent are performed in 1-3 medium volume centers (11-20 resections a year). The remainder (42%) is performed in two high volume centers (> 50 resections a year). Hospital mortality is 12.1%, 7.5% and 4.9% respectively (P < 0.001). The high volume centers seem to see slightly more advanced tumors than the low and medium volume centers.
CONCLUSIONS: There is a significant (inverse) relation between hospital mortality and hospital volume for esophageal resection in the Netherlands. Although hospital mortality is not the only measure for quality of care, these data suggest a potential beneficial effect to centralization of esophagectomy in the Netherlands. Copyright 2001 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11301408     DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(20010415)91:8<1574::aid-cncr1168>3.0.co;2-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  45 in total

1.  Biodegradable esophageal stent placement does not prevent high-grade stricture formation after circumferential mucosal resection in a porcine model.

Authors:  Eric M Pauli; Steve J Schomisch; Joseph P Furlan; Andrea S Marks; Amitabh Chak; Richard H Lash; Jeffrey L Ponsky; Jeffrey M Marks
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-06-09       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Diagnosis and management of Barrett's esophagus for the endoscopist.

Authors:  Sagar S Garud; Steven Keilin; Qiang Cai; Field F Willingham
Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 4.409

3.  Intrathoracic leaks following esophagectomy are no longer associated with increased mortality.

Authors:  Linda W Martin; Stephen G Swisher; Wayne Hofstetter; Arlene M Correa; Reza J Mehran; David C Rice; Ara A Vaporciyan; Garrett L Walsh; Jack A Roth
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Video-assisted surgery in gastric cancer.

Authors:  Josep Roig; Jordi Gironès; Elisenda Garsot; Manel Puig; Marcel Pujades; José I Rodríguez; Antoni Codina
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.405

Review 5.  Multiband mucosectomy for advanced dysplastic lesions in the upper digestive tract.

Authors:  Jesús Espinel; Eugenia Pinedo; Vanesa Ojeda; Maria Guerra Del Rio
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-04-16

6.  National trends in esophageal surgery--are outcomes as good as we believe?

Authors:  Geoffrey Paul Kohn; Joseph Anton Galanko; Michael Owen Meyers; Richard Harry Feins; Timothy Michael Farrell
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 7.  American Gastroenterological Association technical review on the management of Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  Stuart J Spechler; Prateek Sharma; Rhonda F Souza; John M Inadomi; Nicholas J Shaheen
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 22.682

8.  Management of Barrett's oesophagus and intramucosal oesophageal cancer: a review of recent development.

Authors:  Shanmugarajah Rajendra; Prateek Sharma
Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 4.409

9.  Effect of hospital volume of thyroidectomies on outcomes following substernal thyroidectomy.

Authors:  Fredric M Pieracci; Thomas J Fahey
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  Depth of submucosal invasion does not predict lymph node metastasis and survival of patients with esophageal carcinoma.

Authors:  Rami J Badreddine; Ganapathy A Prasad; Jason T Lewis; Lori S Lutzke; Lynn S Borkenhagen; Kelly T Dunagan; Kenneth K Wang
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2009-11-27       Impact factor: 11.382

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.