Literature DB >> 17102050

Relationship between noise, dose, and pitch in cardiac multi-detector row CT.

Andrew N Primak1, Cynthia H McCollough, Michael R Bruesewitz, Jie Zhang, Joel G Fletcher.   

Abstract

In spiral computed tomography (CT), dose is always inversely proportional to pitch. However, the relationship between noise and pitch (and hence noise and dose) depends on the scanner type (single vs multi-detector row) and reconstruction mode (cardiac vs noncardiac). In single detector row spiral CT, noise is independent of pitch. Conversely, in noncardiac multi-detector row CT, noise depends on pitch because the spiral interpolation algorithm makes use of redundant data from different detector rows to decrease noise for pitch values less than 1 (and increase noise for pitch values > 1). However, in cardiac spiral CT, redundant data cannot be used because such data averaging would degrade the temporal resolution. Therefore, the behavior of noise versus pitch returns to the single detector row paradigm, with noise being independent of pitch. Consequently, since faster rotation times require lower pitch values in cardiac multi-detector row CT, dose is increased without a commensurate decrease in noise. Thus, the use of faster rotation times will improve temporal resolution, not alter noise, and increase dose. For a particular application, the higher dose resulting from faster rotation speeds should be justified by the clinical benefits of the improved temporal resolution. RSNA, 2006

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17102050     DOI: 10.1148/rg.266065063

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiographics        ISSN: 0271-5333            Impact factor:   5.333


  46 in total

1.  High-pitch dual-source CT angiography of the aortic valve-aortic root complex without ECG-synchronization.

Authors:  Christoph Karlo; Sebastian Leschka; Robert Paul Goetti; Gudrun Feuchtner; Lotus Desbiolles; Paul Stolzmann; Andre Plass; Volkmar Falk; Borut Marincek; Hatem Alkadhi; Stephan Baumüller
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-07-31       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Concept of minimal heart rate for each pitch value to avoid interpolation artifact when using dual-source CT: a phantom study.

Authors:  Joon-Won Kang; Kyung-Hyun Do; Jae-Yeon Chung; Hyun Jong Cho; Joon Beom Seo; Tae-Hwan Lim
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2010-01-30       Impact factor: 2.357

3.  Low dose dual-source CT angiography of the thoracic aorta.

Authors:  Cormac Farrelly; Amir Davarpanah; Aoife N Keeling; John Sheehan; Ann Ragin; Vahid Yaghmai; James C Carr
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 4.  Radiation dose of cardiac CT--what is the evidence?

Authors:  Hatem Alkadhi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-02-04       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Estimation of the radiation exposure of a chest pain protocol with ECG-gating in dual-source computed tomography.

Authors:  Dominik Ketelsen; Marie H Luetkhoff; Christoph Thomas; Matthias Werner; Markus Buchgeister; Ilias Tsiflikas; Anja Reimann; Christof Burgstahler; Andreas F Kopp; Claus D Claussen; Martin Heuschmid
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-07-22       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Dose reduction in spiral CT coronary angiography with dual source equipment. Part II. Dose surplus due to slope-up and slope-down of prospective tube current modulation in a phantom model.

Authors:  C Martini; A Palumbo; E Maffei; A Rossi; M Rengo; R Malagò; M Dijkshoorn; A Weustink; N Mollet; G Krestin; F Cademartiri
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.469

7.  Dose reduction in spiral CT coronary angiography with dual-source equipment. Part I. A phantom study applying different prospective tube current modulation algorithms.

Authors:  C Martini; A Palumbo; E Maffei; A Rossi; M Rengo; R Malagò; M Dijkshoorn; A Weustink; N Mollet; G Krestin; F Cademartiri
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2009-08-07       Impact factor: 3.469

8.  Radiation dose reduction in cerebral CT perfusion imaging using iterative reconstruction.

Authors:  Joris M Niesten; Irene C van der Schaaf; Alan J Riordan; Hugo W A M de Jong; Alexander D Horsch; Daniel Eijspaart; Ewoud J Smit; Willem P T M Mali; Birgitta K Velthuis
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-10-15       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Radiation dose threshold for coronary artery calcium score with MDCT: how low can you go?

Authors:  Tom D Newton; Hatem Mehrez; Kelly Wong; Ravi Menezes; Bernd J Wintersperger; Andrew Crean; Elsie Nguyen; Narinder Paul
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-06-03       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Frequency-Selective Computed Tomography: Applications During Periodic Thoracic Motion.

Authors:  Jacob Herrmann; Eric A Hoffman; David W Kaczka
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 10.048

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.