Literature DB >> 17092232

Load-related bone modelling at the interface of orthodontic micro-implants.

André Büchter1, Dirk Wiechmann, Christoph Gaertner, Marc Hendrik, Martin Vogeler, Hans Peter Wiesmann, Josef Piffko, Ulrich Meyer.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the interface reaction of two different titanium micro-implant systems activated with different load regimens. A total of 200 micro-implants (100 Abso Anchor and 100 Dual Top) were placed in the mandible of eight Göttinger minipigs. Two implants each were immediately loaded in the opposite direction by various forces (100, 300 or 500 cN) through tension coils. Three different distances between the neck of the implant and the bone rim (1, 2, 3 mm) were used. The loads provided by superelastic tension coils (which are known to develop a virtually constant force) led to a range of tip moments 0-900 cN mm at the neck of implants. Non-loaded implants were used as a reference. Bone tissue responses were evaluated by histology, histomorphometry and scanning electron microscopy after 22 and 70 days of loading. Implant loosening was present in the groups where the load reached 900 cN mm. No movement of implants through the bone was found in the experimental groups, for any of the applied loads. A direct bone-to-implant contact to various extents was observed at differently loaded implants. Ultrastructural analysis confirmed the clinical and histological finding that implants (except when loaded at 900 cN mm) were well osseointegrated after 22 days. An increase in the bone-to-implant contact ratio was observed during the experimental period in the coronal part of the implants in most experimental groups. The difference reached a level of statistical significance at 500 cN mm (Abso Anchor) and 600 cN mm (Dual Top). We conclude that micro-implants can not only be loaded immediately without impairment of implant stability but many enhance bone formation at the interface when the load-related biomechanics do not exceed an upper limit of tip moment at the bone rim.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17092232     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01233.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res        ISSN: 0905-7161            Impact factor:   5.977


  11 in total

1.  Orthodontic mini-implant stability at different insertion depths : Sensitivity of three stability measurement methods.

Authors:  Manuel Nienkemper; Natascha Santel; Ralf Hönscheid; Dieter Drescher
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 1.938

2.  Evaluation of Stress Pattern Caused by Mini-Implant in Mandibular Alveolar Bone with Different Angulations and Retraction Forces: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Study.

Authors:  Manreet Sidhu; Vinay Kumar Chugh; Kuldeep Dmello; Anurag Mehta; Ankita Chugh; Pradeep Tandon
Journal:  Turk J Orthod       Date:  2020-07-18

3.  Stability of smooth and rough mini-implants: clinical and biomechanical evaluation - an in vivostudy.

Authors:  Giselle Naback Lemes Vilani; Antônio Carlos de Oliveira Ruellas; Carlos Nelson Elias; Cláudia Trindade Mattos
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2015-10

4.  Measurement of mini-implant stability using resonance frequency analysis.

Authors:  Manuel Nienkemper; Benedict Wilmes; Agamemnon Panayotidis; Alexander Pauls; Vladimir Golubovic; Frank Schwarz; Dieter Drescher
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2012-08-29       Impact factor: 2.079

5.  In vivo evaluation of immediately loaded stainless steel and titanium orthodontic screws in a growing bone.

Authors:  Kerstin Gritsch; Norbert Laroche; Jeanne-Marie Bonnet; Patrick Exbrayat; Laurent Morgon; Muriel Rabilloud; Brigitte Grosgogeat
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Influence of late removal after treatment on the removal torque of microimplants.

Authors:  Ho-Jin Kim; Hyo-Sang Park
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2022-05-25       Impact factor: 1.361

7.  Class II correction by maxillary en masse distalization using a completely customized lingual appliance and a novel mini-screw anchorage concept - preliminary results.

Authors:  Frauke Beyling; Elisabeth Klang; Eva Niehoff; Rainer Schwestka-Polly; Hans-Joachim Helms; Dirk Wiechmann
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 2.151

8.  Effect of healing time on bone-implant contact of orthodontic micro-implants: a histologic study.

Authors:  Barat Ali Ramazanzadeh; Kazem Fatemi; Mahboobe Dehghani; Nooshin Mohtasham; Arezoo Jahanbin; Hamed Sadeghian
Journal:  ISRN Dent       Date:  2014-04-06

9.  Rigid External Distraction with Intranasal Bone-borne Traction Hooks for Midfacial Hypoplasia.

Authors:  Yilue Zheng; Haizhou Tong; Ningbei Yin; Feng Niu; Zhenmin Zhao; Tao Song
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-07-02       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Histomorphometric evaluation of the bone surrounding orthodontic miniscrews according to their adjacent root proximity.

Authors:  Hyun-Ju Oh; Jung-Yul Cha; Hyung-Seog Yu; Chung-Ju Hwang
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2018-08-08       Impact factor: 1.372

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.