Literature DB >> 32974060

Evaluation of Stress Pattern Caused by Mini-Implant in Mandibular Alveolar Bone with Different Angulations and Retraction Forces: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Study.

Manreet Sidhu1, Vinay Kumar Chugh2, Kuldeep Dmello3, Anurag Mehta4, Ankita Chugh2, Pradeep Tandon5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to evaluate the stress pattern in cortical and cancellous bones, periodontal ligament, and in the implant itself when a mini-implant (MI) is inserted in the inter-radicular space between mandibular first molar and second premolar at various angulations and different retraction forces.
METHODS: Finite element study was conducted with MI insertion at 30°, 45°, 60°, 75°, and 90° angulations in the mandibular posterior region (between second premolar and first molar). At these angulations, horizontal forces of 150, 200, and 250 g were applied to the middle of the MI head. von Mises stress values were then evaluated using the ANSYS software.
RESULTS: Highest von Mises stress values were detected in the MI itself, followed by cortical bone, cancellous bone, and periodontal ligament. The von Mises stress values in cortical bone were highest at 30° angulation and lowest at 90° angulation. In the cancellous bone, the stress value was found to be maximum at 90°. The von Mises stress values in the MI were lowest at 90°. In all four structures, as the load increased from 150 to 250 g, the von Mises stress values increased.
CONCLUSION: The von Mises stress values in the cortical bone, MI, and periodontal ligament were found to be lowest at 90°. Placement of the MI at 90° appears to be an ideal angulation when applied with a horizontal load. Force range used is within clinically recommended levels; however, the increase in load causes an increase in the stress values. © Copyright 2020 by Turkish Orthodontic Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancellous bone; cortical bone; finite element model; mini-implant; periodontal ligament

Year:  2020        PMID: 32974060      PMCID: PMC7491965          DOI: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2020.19109

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Turk J Orthod        ISSN: 2148-9505


  32 in total

1.  Initial stress differences between sliding and sectional mechanics with an endosseous implant as anchorage: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.

Authors:  M Vásquez; E Calao; F Becerra; J Ossa; C Enríquez; E Fresneda
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.079

2.  Finite element analysis of miniscrew implants used for orthodontic anchorage.

Authors:  Te-Chun Liu; Chih-Han Chang; Tung-Yiu Wong; Jia-Kuang Liu
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 2.650

3.  Rigid endosseous implants for orthodontic and orthopedic anchorage.

Authors:  W E Roberts; F R Helm; K J Marshall; R K Gongloff
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.079

4.  [A three-dimensional finite element analysis for the biomechanical characteristics of orthodontic anchorage micro-implant].

Authors:  Yang Zhang; Dan Zhang; Cui-juan Feng
Journal:  Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue       Date:  2005-06

5.  Root proximity is a major factor for screw failure in orthodontic anchorage.

Authors:  Shingo Kuroda; Kazuyo Yamada; Toru Deguchi; Takashi Hashimoto; Hee-Moon Kyung; Teruko Takano-Yamamoto
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.650

6.  Three-dimensional finite element stress analysis in and around the Screw-Vent implant.

Authors:  N L Clelland; Y H Ismail; H S Zaki; D Pipko
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.804

7.  Factorial analysis of variables affecting bone stress adjacent to the orthodontic anchorage mini-implant with finite element analysis.

Authors:  Ting-Sheng Lin; Feng-De Tsai; Chih-Yu Chen; Li-Wen Lin
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.650

8.  Biomechanical considerations in osseointegrated prostheses.

Authors:  R Skalak
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 3.426

9.  Factors associated with the stability of titanium screws placed in the posterior region for orthodontic anchorage.

Authors:  Shouichi Miyawaki; Isao Koyama; Masahide Inoue; Katsuaki Mishima; Toshio Sugahara; Teruko Takano-Yamamoto
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.650

10.  Factors associated with the stability of mini-implants for orthodontic anchorage: a study of 414 samples in Taiwan.

Authors:  Tzu-Ying Wu; Shou-Hsin Kuang; Cheng-Hsien Wu
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 1.895

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.