Literature DB >> 17091292

When practice does not make perfect: well-practiced handwriting interferes with the consolidation phase gains in learning a movement sequence.

Meirav Balas1, Neta Roitenberg, Nir Giladi, Avi Karni.   

Abstract

Practice on a novel sequence of movements can lead to two expressions of procedural memory consolidation: delayed performance gains evolving hours after training, and a decrease in the susceptibility of the training-related gains to interference by subsequent experience. It has been assumed that behavioral interference occurs only if a critical overlap between the representations of the two tasks exists, and that such overlap is more likely when the two tasks are novel, competing for general resources for their execution. We investigated whether the delayed gains in the simple finger-opposition sequence (FOS) learning task are more prone to interference by well practiced than by less practiced complex hand movements. Participants were trained on the FOS task in a baseline (no interference) and an interference training condition. In the Interference condition, after FOS practice, participants wrote Hebrew common words in Hebrew (native script) or a Latin script (Heblatin). Native script writing but not the less practiced Heblatin, interfered with FOS learning, with significantly reduced delayed gains. Our results show that interference can occur even when two tasks share little or no kinematic or dynamic features and indicate that the representation of complex but well-practiced movement sequences may overlap with the representation of simpler ones. This result is in line with the notion that well-practiced complex movement sequences come to be represented as simpler ones in long-term motor memory.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17091292     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-006-0757-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  40 in total

1.  Composition and decomposition of internal models in motor learning under altered kinematic and dynamic environments.

Authors:  J R Flanagan; E Nakano; H Imamizu; R Osu; T Yoshioka; M Kawato
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-10-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Independent learning of internal models for kinematic and dynamic control of reaching.

Authors:  J W Krakauer; M F Ghilardi; C Ghez
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Role of the human motor cortex in rapid motor learning.

Authors:  W Muellbacher; U Ziemann; B Boroojerdi; L Cohen; M Hallett
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Changes of somatosensory evoked potentials during writing with the dominant and non-dominant hands.

Authors:  M Hoshiyama; R Kakigi
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1999-06-26       Impact factor: 3.252

Review 5.  Memory--a century of consolidation.

Authors:  J L McGaugh
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-01-14       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  From primed to learn: the saturation of repetition priming and the induction of long-term memory.

Authors:  B Hauptmann; A Karni
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2002-05

7.  Kinematics and dynamics are not represented independently in motor working memory: evidence from an interference study.

Authors:  Christine Tong; Daniel M Wolpert; J Randall Flanagan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-02-01       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Patterns of interference in sequence learning and prism adaptation inconsistent with the consolidation hypothesis.

Authors:  Kelly M Goedert; Daniel B Willingham
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2002 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.460

9.  Anatomy of motor learning. I. Frontal cortex and attention to action.

Authors:  M Jueptner; K M Stephan; C D Frith; D J Brooks; R S Frackowiak; R E Passingham
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Adaptation to visuomotor transformations: consolidation, interference, and forgetting.

Authors:  John W Krakauer; Claude Ghez; M Felice Ghilardi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-01-12       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  14 in total

1.  Interference effects between manual and oral motor skills.

Authors:  Marie-Hélène Gagné; Henri Cohen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-12-12       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Interference during the implicit learning of two different motor sequences.

Authors:  Marianne A Stephan; Beat Meier; Ariane Orosz; Katja Cattapan-Ludewig; Alain Kaelin-Lang
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-05-24       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Facilitation of taste memory acquisition by experiencing previous novel taste is protein-synthesis dependent.

Authors:  Maayan Merhav; Kobi Rosenblum
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2008-07-14       Impact factor: 2.460

4.  Learning two things at once: differential constraints on the acquisition and consolidation of perceptual learning.

Authors:  K Banai; J A Ortiz; J D Oppenheimer; B A Wright
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2010-01-20       Impact factor: 3.590

5.  Interference effects between memory systems in the acquisition of a skill.

Authors:  Marie-Hélène Gagné; Henri Cohen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-07-06       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Serial practice impairs motor skill consolidation.

Authors:  Kristin-Marie Neville; Maxime Trempe
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Differential rates of consolidation of conceptual and stimulus learning following training on an auditory skill.

Authors:  Jeanette A Ortiz; Beverly A Wright
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Interference to consolidation phase gains in learning a novel movement sequence by handwriting: dependence on laterality and the level of experience with the written sequence.

Authors:  Meirav Balas; Shai Netser; Nir Giladi; Avi Karni
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-02-02       Impact factor: 2.064

9.  Sequence specific motor performance gains after memory consolidation in children and adolescents.

Authors:  Shoshi Dorfberger; Esther Adi-Japha; Avi Karni
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-01-19       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Fact retrieval and memory consolidation for a movement sequence: bidirectional effects of 'unrelated' cognitive tasks on procedural memory.

Authors:  Rachel Tibi; Zohar Eviatar; Avi Karni
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.