Literature DB >> 19466398

Interference during the implicit learning of two different motor sequences.

Marianne A Stephan1, Beat Meier, Ariane Orosz, Katja Cattapan-Ludewig, Alain Kaelin-Lang.   

Abstract

It has been demonstrated that learning a second motor task after having learned a first task may interfere with the long-term consolidation of the first task. However, little is known about immediate changes in the representation of the motor memory in the early acquisition phase within the first minutes of the learning process. Therefore, we investigated such early interference effects with an implicit serial reaction time task in 55 healthy subjects. Each subject performed either a sequence learning task involving two different sequences, or a random control task. The results showed that learning the first sequence led to only a slight, short-lived interference effect in the early acquisition phase of the second sequence. Overall, learning of neither sequence was impaired. Furthermore, the two processes, sequence-unrelated task learning (i.e. general motor training) and the sequence learning itself did not appear to interfere with each other. In conclusion, although the long-term consolidation of a motor memory has been shown to be sensitive to other interfering memories, the present study suggests that the brain is initially able to acquire more than one new motor sequence within a short space of time without significant interference.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19466398     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-009-1845-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  35 in total

1.  Inhibitory control of competing motor memories.

Authors:  R Shadmehr; H H Holcomb
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Independent learning of internal models for kinematic and dynamic control of reaching.

Authors:  J W Krakauer; M F Ghilardi; C Ghez
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 3.  Memory traces revisited.

Authors:  L Nadel; C Land
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 34.870

4.  Conditions for interference versus facilitation during sequential sensorimotor adaptation.

Authors:  O Bock; S Schneider; J Bloomberg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Kinematics and dynamics are not represented independently in motor working memory: evidence from an interference study.

Authors:  Christine Tong; Daniel M Wolpert; J Randall Flanagan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-02-01       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Patterns of interference in sequence learning and prism adaptation inconsistent with the consolidation hypothesis.

Authors:  Kelly M Goedert; Daniel B Willingham
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2002 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.460

7.  Off-line learning and the primary motor cortex.

Authors:  Edwin M Robertson; Daniel Z Press; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-07-06       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Prefrontal and striatal activation in elderly subjects during concurrent implicit and explicit sequence learning.

Authors:  Howard J Aizenstein; Meryl A Butters; Kristi A Clark; Jennifer L Figurski; V Andrew Stenger; Robert D Nebes; Charles F Reynolds; Cameron S Carter
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2005-06-01       Impact factor: 4.673

9.  On the development of procedural knowledge.

Authors:  D B Willingham; M J Nissen; P Bullemer
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  Distinct contribution of the striatum and cerebellum to motor learning.

Authors:  R Laforce; J Doyon
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.310

View more
  4 in total

1.  Here today, gone tomorrow--adaptation to change in memory-guided visual search.

Authors:  Martina Zellin; Markus Conci; Adrian von Mühlenen; Hermann J Müller
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Evidence of automatic processing in sequence learning using process-dissociation.

Authors:  Heather M Mong; David P McCabe; Benjamin A Clegg
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2012-05-21

3.  Differential roles of sleep spindles and sleep slow oscillations in memory consolidation.

Authors:  Yina Wei; Giri P Krishnan; Maxim Komarov; Maxim Bazhenov
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2018-07-09       Impact factor: 4.475

4.  Defining the Parameters of Incidental Learning on a Serial Reaction Time (SRT) Task: Do Conscious Rules Apply?

Authors:  Lynne A Barker
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2012-12-17
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.