Literature DB >> 17079102

High-frequency tinnitus without hearing loss does not mean absence of deafferentation.

Nathan Weisz1, Thomas Hartmann, Katalin Dohrmann, Winfried Schlee, Arnaud Norena.   

Abstract

A broad consensus within the neuroscience of tinnitus holds that this audiologic condition is triggered by central deafferentation, mostly due to cochlear damage. The absence of audiometrically detectable hearing loss however poses a challenge to this rather generalizing assumption. The aim of this study was therefore to scrutinize cochlear functioning in a sample of tinnitus subjects audiometrically matched to a normal hearing control group. Two tests were applied: the Threshold Equalizing Noise (TEN) test and a pitch scaling task. To perform well on both tasks relatively normal functioning of inner hair cells is a requirement. In the TEN test the tinnitus group revealed a circumscribed increment of thresholds partially overlapping with the tinnitus spectrum. Abnormal slopes were observed in the pitch scaling task which indicated that tinnitus subjects, when presented with a high-frequency stimulus, relied heavily on input derived from lower-frequency inner hair cells (off-frequency listening). In total both results argue for the presence of a deafferentation also in tinnitus subjects with audiometrically normal thresholds and therefore favour the deafferentation assumption posed by most neuroscientific theories.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17079102     DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2006.09.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  92 in total

1.  Cortisol suppression and hearing thresholds in tinnitus after low-dose dexamethasone challenge.

Authors:  Veerle L Simoens; Sylvie Hébert
Journal:  BMC Ear Nose Throat Disord       Date:  2012-03-26

2.  [Cortical plasticity and changes in tinnitus: treatment options].

Authors:  N Weisz; B Langguth
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.284

3.  Tuning out the noise: limbic-auditory interactions in tinnitus.

Authors:  Josef P Rauschecker; Amber M Leaver; Mark Mühlau
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2010-06-24       Impact factor: 17.173

4.  Tinnitus Does Not Interfere with Auditory and Speech Perception.

Authors:  Fan-Gang Zeng; Matthew Richardson; Katie Turner
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-06-17       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Tinnitus Management in Lateral Skull Base Lesions.

Authors:  Juan San Juan; Gregory J Basura
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2018-11-30

6.  Auditory processing disorders with and without central auditory discrimination deficits.

Authors:  Alexandra Annemarie Ludwig; Michael Fuchs; Eberhard Kruse; Brigitte Uhlig; Sonja Annette Kotz; Rudolf Rübsamen
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-06

Review 7.  No longer falling on deaf ears: mechanisms of degeneration and regeneration of cochlear ribbon synapses.

Authors:  Guoqiang Wan; Gabriel Corfas
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2015-04-30       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Relationship between noise-induced hearing-loss, persistent tinnitus and growth-associated protein-43 expression in the rat cochlear nucleus: does synaptic plasticity in ventral cochlear nucleus suppress tinnitus?

Authors:  K S Kraus; D Ding; H Jiang; E Lobarinas; W Sun; R J Salvi
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2011-07-28       Impact factor: 3.590

9.  The Neural Bases of Tinnitus: Lessons from Deafness and Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Marlies Knipper; Pim van Dijk; Holger Schulze; Birgit Mazurek; Patrick Krauss; Verena Scheper; Athanasia Warnecke; Winfried Schlee; Kerstin Schwabe; Wibke Singer; Christoph Braun; Paul H Delano; Andreas J Fallgatter; Ann-Christine Ehlis; Grant D Searchfield; Matthias H J Munk; David M Baguley; Lukas Rüttiger
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Temporo-insular enhancement of EEG low and high frequencies in patients with chronic tinnitus. QEEG study of chronic tinnitus patients.

Authors:  Morteza Moazami-Goudarzi; Lars Michels; Nathan Weisz; Daniel Jeanmonod
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 3.288

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.