Literature DB >> 32938634

The Neural Bases of Tinnitus: Lessons from Deafness and Cochlear Implants.

Marlies Knipper1, Pim van Dijk2,3, Holger Schulze4, Birgit Mazurek5, Patrick Krauss4, Verena Scheper6,7, Athanasia Warnecke6,7, Winfried Schlee8, Kerstin Schwabe6,7, Wibke Singer9, Christoph Braun10, Paul H Delano11, Andreas J Fallgatter12, Ann-Christine Ehlis12, Grant D Searchfield13,14, Matthias H J Munk12,15, David M Baguley16,17, Lukas Rüttiger9.   

Abstract

Subjective tinnitus is the conscious perception of sound in the absence of any acoustic source. The literature suggests various tinnitus mechanisms, most of which invoke changes in spontaneous firing rates of central auditory neurons resulting from modification of neural gain. Here, we present an alternative model based on evidence that tinnitus is: (1) rare in people who are congenitally deaf, (2) common in people with acquired deafness, and (3) potentially suppressed by active cochlear implants used for hearing restoration. We propose that tinnitus can only develop after fast auditory fiber activity has stimulated the synapse formation between fast-spiking parvalbumin positive (PV+) interneurons and projecting neurons in the ascending auditory path and coactivated frontostriatal networks after hearing onset. Thereafter, fast auditory fiber activity promotes feedforward and feedback inhibition mediated by PV+ interneuron activity in auditory-specific circuits. This inhibitory network enables enhanced stimulus resolution, attention-driven contrast improvement, and augmentation of auditory responses in central auditory pathways (neural gain) after damage of slow auditory fibers. When fast auditory fiber activity is lost, tonic PV+ interneuron activity is diminished, resulting in the prolonged response latencies, sudden hyperexcitability, enhanced cortical synchrony, elevated spontaneous γ oscillations, and impaired attention/stress-control that have been described in previous tinnitus models. Moreover, because fast processing is gained through sensory experience, tinnitus would not exist in congenital deafness. Electrical cochlear stimulation may have the potential to reestablish tonic inhibitory networks and thus suppress tinnitus. The proposed framework unites many ideas of tinnitus pathophysiology and may catalyze cooperative efforts to develop tinnitus therapies.
Copyright © 2020 the authors.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32938634      PMCID: PMC7534911          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1314-19.2020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  176 in total

1.  Two modes of release shape the postsynaptic response at the inner hair cell ribbon synapse.

Authors:  Lisa Grant; Eunyoung Yi; Elisabeth Glowatzki
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Heschl's gyrus, posterior superior temporal gyrus, and mid-ventrolateral prefrontal cortex have different roles in the detection of acoustic changes.

Authors:  Marc Schönwiesner; Nikolai Novitski; Satu Pakarinen; Synnöve Carlson; Mari Tervaniemi; Risto Näätänen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-12-20       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 3.  Associations between stress and hearing problems in humans.

Authors:  Barbara Canlon; Töres Theorell; Dan Hasson
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2012-09-12       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Distinct Inhibitory Circuits Orchestrate Cortical beta and gamma Band Oscillations.

Authors:  Guang Chen; Yuan Zhang; Xiang Li; Xiaochen Zhao; Qian Ye; Yingxi Lin; Huizhong W Tao; Malte J Rasch; Xiaohui Zhang
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 17.173

5.  A large cohort study of GJB2 mutations in Japanese hearing loss patients.

Authors:  K Tsukada; S Nishio; S Usami
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.438

6.  Tinnitus is prevalent in children with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Neil K Chadha; Karen A Gordon; Adrian L James; Blake C Papsin
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2009-01-29       Impact factor: 1.675

Review 7.  Cochlear implants and tinnitus.

Authors:  David M Baguley; Marcus D Atlas
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.453

Review 8.  Frontostriatal Gating of Tinnitus and Chronic Pain.

Authors:  Josef P Rauschecker; Elisabeth S May; Audrey Maudoux; Markus Ploner
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 20.229

9.  A loss of parvalbumin-containing interneurons is associated with diminished oscillatory activity in an animal model of schizophrenia.

Authors:  Daniel J Lodge; Margarita M Behrens; Anthony A Grace
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-02-25       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Computational models of neurophysiological correlates of tinnitus.

Authors:  Roland Schaette; Richard Kempter
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2012-05-08
View more
  17 in total

1.  Macrostructural Changes of the Acoustic Radiation in Humans with Hearing Loss and Tinnitus Revealed with Fixel-Based Analysis.

Authors:  Elouise A Koops; Shereif Haykal; Pim van Dijk
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 2. 

Authors:  Gerhard Hesse; Georg Kastellis; Birgit Mazurek
Journal:  HNO Nachr       Date:  2022-10-14

3.  Co-occurrence of Hyperacusis Accelerates With Tinnitus Burden Over Time and Requires Medical Care.

Authors:  Fatma Refat; Jakob Wertz; Pauline Hinrichs; Uwe Klose; Hesham Samy; Rafeek Mohamed Abdelkader; Jörg Saemisch; Benedikt Hofmeier; Wibke Singer; Lukas Rüttiger; Marlies Knipper; Stephan Wolpert
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 4.003

Review 4.  Age-related hearing loss pertaining to potassium ion channels in the cochlea and auditory pathway.

Authors:  Barbara Peixoto Pinheiro; Barbara Vona; Hubert Löwenheim; Lukas Rüttiger; Marlies Knipper; Youssef Adel
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  2020-12-17       Impact factor: 3.657

5.  Deletion of BDNF in Pax2 Lineage-Derived Interneuron Precursors in the Hindbrain Hampers the Proportion of Excitation/Inhibition, Learning, and Behavior.

Authors:  Philipp Eckert; Philine Marchetta; Marie K Manthey; Michael H Walter; Sasa Jovanovic; Daria Savitska; Wibke Singer; Michele H Jacob; Lukas Rüttiger; Thomas Schimmang; Ivan Milenkovic; Peter K D Pilz; Marlies Knipper
Journal:  Front Mol Neurosci       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 5.639

6.  Detecting Noise-Induced Cochlear Synaptopathy by Auditory Brainstem Response in Tinnitus Patients With Normal Hearing Thresholds: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Feifan Chen; Fei Zhao; Nadeem Mahafza; Wei Lu
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 4.677

7.  Neuron Compatibility and Antioxidant Activity of Barium Titanate and Lithium Niobate Nanoparticles.

Authors:  Mariarita Candito; Edi Simoni; Erica Gentilin; Alessandro Martini; Gino Marioni; Serena Danti; Laura Astolfi
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-02-03       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 8.  Hearing loss and brain plasticity: the hyperactivity phenomenon.

Authors:  Björn Herrmann; Blake E Butler
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 3.270

9.  Disturbed Balance of Inhibitory Signaling Links Hearing Loss and Cognition.

Authors:  Marlies Knipper; Wibke Singer; Kerstin Schwabe; Gisela E Hagberg; Yiwen Li Hegner; Lukas Rüttiger; Christoph Braun; Rüdiger Land
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 3.492

10.  Functional biomarkers that distinguish between tinnitus with and without hyperacusis.

Authors:  Benedikt Hofmeier; Jakob Wertz; Fatma Refat; Pauline Hinrichs; Jörg Saemisch; Wibke Singer; Lukas Rüttiger; Uwe Klose; Marlies Knipper; Stephan Wolpert
Journal:  Clin Transl Med       Date:  2021-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.