Literature DB >> 22710937

Behavioral determination of stimulus pair discrimination of auditory acoustic and electrical stimuli using a classical conditioning and heart-rate approach.

Simeon J Morgan1, Antonio G Paolini.   

Abstract

Acute animal preparations have been used in research prospectively investigating electrode designs and stimulation techniques for integration into neural auditory prostheses, such as auditory brainstem implants and auditory midbrain implants. While acute experiments can give initial insight to the effectiveness of the implant, testing the chronically implanted and awake animals provides the advantage of examining the psychophysical properties of the sensations induced using implanted devices. Several techniques such as reward-based operant conditioning, conditioned avoidance, or classical fear conditioning have been used to provide behavioral confirmation of detection of a relevant stimulus attribute. Selection of a technique involves balancing aspects including time efficiency (often poor in reward-based approaches), the ability to test a plurality of stimulus attributes simultaneously (limited in conditioned avoidance), and measure reliability of repeated stimuli (a potential constraint when physiological measures are employed). Here, a classical fear conditioning behavioral method is presented which may be used to simultaneously test both detection of a stimulus, and discrimination between two stimuli. Heart-rate is used as a measure of fear response, which reduces or eliminates the requirement for time-consuming video coding for freeze behaviour or other such measures (although such measures could be included to provide convergent evidence). Animals were conditioned using these techniques in three 2-hour conditioning sessions, each providing 48 stimulus trials. Subsequent 48-trial testing sessions were then used to test for detection of each stimulus in presented pairs, and test discrimination between the member stimuli of each pair. This behavioral method is presented in the context of its utilisation in auditory prosthetic research. The implantation of electrocardiogram telemetry devices is shown. Subsequent implantation of brain electrodes into the Cochlear Nucleus, guided by the monitoring of neural responses to acoustic stimuli, and the fixation of the electrode into place for chronic use is likewise shown.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22710937      PMCID: PMC3476383          DOI: 10.3791/3598

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis Exp        ISSN: 1940-087X            Impact factor:   1.355


  15 in total

1.  Behavioral and neurophysiological thresholds for electrical cochlear stimulation in the deaf cat.

Authors:  R E Beitel; M Vollmer; R L Snyder; C E Schreiner; P A Leake
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2000 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.854

2.  Auditory detection and discrimination in deaf cats: psychophysical and neural thresholds for intracochlear electrical signals.

Authors:  M Vollmer; R E Beitel; R L Snyder
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Inferior colliculus responses to dual-site intralamina stimulation in the ventral cochlear nucleus.

Authors:  Mohit N Shivdasani; Stefan J Mauger; Rebecca E Argent; Graeme D Rathbone; Antonio G Paolini
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 3.215

4.  Microstimulation in auditory cortex provides a substrate for detailed behaviors.

Authors:  Kevin J Otto; Patrick J Rousche; Daryl R Kipke
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2005-10-04       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Auditory cortical responses to electrical stimulation of the inferior colliculus: implications for an auditory midbrain implant.

Authors:  Hubert H Lim; David J Anderson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-05-24       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  A characterization of the effects on neuronal excitability due to prolonged microstimulation with chronically implanted microelectrodes.

Authors:  D B McCreery; T G Yuen; W F Agnew; L A Bullara
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 4.538

7.  The lateral amygdaloid nucleus: sensory interface of the amygdala in fear conditioning.

Authors:  J E LeDoux; P Cicchetti; A Xagoraris; L M Romanski
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 8.  Response of brain tissue to chronically implanted neural electrodes.

Authors:  Vadim S Polikov; Patrick A Tresco; William M Reichert
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2005-09-27       Impact factor: 2.390

9.  Histological and physiological effects of the central auditory prosthesis: surface versus penetrating electrodes.

Authors:  X Liu; G McPhee; H L Seldon; G M Clark
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Functional responses from guinea pigs with cochlear implants. I. Electrophysiological and psychophysical measures.

Authors:  C A Miller; K E Woodruff; B E Pfingst
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 3.208

View more
  1 in total

1.  Auditory fear conditioning alters neural gain in the cochlear nucleus: a wireless neural recording study in freely behaving rats.

Authors:  Antonio G Paolini; Simeon J Morgan; Jee Hyun Kim
Journal:  Neuronal Signal       Date:  2020-11-16
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.