Literature DB >> 12879179

Perceptual judgement, grasp point selection and object symmetry.

Susan J Lederman1, Alan M Wing.   

Abstract

Object symmetry is a visual attribute that may contribute to perceptual judgement and to action. We evaluated the effects of varying the physical symmetry of planar objects (presence versus absence) on both aspects. In Experiment 1, subjects estimated the magnitude of visually perceived symmetry of the objects. The results confirmed the influence of physical symmetry on perceived symmetry, and supported our binary categorisation of stimulus objects in terms of presence versus absence of physical symmetry. In Experiment 2, participants used a precision grip to grasp and stably lift the same planar objects varying in degree of symmetry. Choice of grasp points was unrestricted. Participants selected a grasp axis (between thumb and middle finger) that limited the perpendicular distance from CM (i.e., grasp-axis error) to just a few millimetres. Moreover, they took advantage of visual cues to object symmetry to better determine CM, thus reducing their grasp-axis error for symmetric (vs. asymmetric) objects by 31%. We interpret these findings in terms of user and object-geometry constraints on grasp-point selection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12879179     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-003-1522-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  19 in total

Review 1.  A new view on grasping.

Authors:  J B Smeets; E Brenner
Journal:  Motor Control       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 1.422

2.  Grasp size and accuracy of approach in reaching.

Authors:  A M Wing; A Turton; C Fraser
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 1.328

3.  The role of symmetry in determining perceived centers within shapes.

Authors:  M Davi; M A Doyle; D R Proffitt
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-08

4.  Anticipating load torques produced by voluntary movements.

Authors:  A M Wing; S J Lederman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Visual and somatosensory information about object shape control manipulative fingertip forces.

Authors:  P Jenmalm; R S Johansson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1997-06-01       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Size-contrast illusions deceive the eye but not the hand.

Authors:  S Aglioti; J F DeSouza; M A Goodale
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  1995-06-01       Impact factor: 10.834

7.  Center of mass perception and inertial frames of reference.

Authors:  G P Bingham; M M Muchisky
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1993-11

8.  Memory representations underlying motor commands used during manipulation of common and novel objects.

Authors:  A M Gordon; G Westling; K J Cole; R S Johansson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  A case study of reaching by a user of a manually-operated artificial hand.

Authors:  C Fraser; A W Wing
Journal:  Prosthet Orthot Int       Date:  1981-12       Impact factor: 1.895

10.  Separate neural pathways for the visual analysis of object shape in perception and prehension.

Authors:  M A Goodale; J P Meenan; H H Bülthoff; D A Nicolle; K J Murphy; C I Racicot
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  1994-07-01       Impact factor: 10.834

View more
  28 in total

1.  Smooth at one end and rough at the other: influence of object texture on grasping behaviour.

Authors:  Catharina Glowania; L C J van Dam; E Brenner; M A Plaisier
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Movement kinematics in prehension are affected by grasping objects of different mass.

Authors:  Daniel Eastough; Martin G Edwards
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-10-28       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Left visual field preference for a bimanual grasping task with ecologically valid object sizes.

Authors:  Ada Le; Matthias Niemeier
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  "Graspability" of objects affects gaze patterns during perception and action tasks.

Authors:  Loni Desanghere; J J Marotta
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-05-20       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Online processing of shape information for control of grasping.

Authors:  Zhongting Chen; Jeffrey A Saunders
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  A right hemisphere dominance for bimanual grasps.

Authors:  Ada Le; Matthias Niemeier
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-10-30       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Center or side: biases in selecting grasp points on small bars.

Authors:  Vivian C Paulun; Urs Kleinholdermann; Karl R Gegenfurtner; Jeroen B J Smeets; Eli Brenner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-03-18       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Discovering affordances that determine the spatial structure of reach-to-grasp movements.

Authors:  Mark Mon-Williams; Geoffrey P Bingham
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Does planning a different trajectory influence the choice of grasping points?

Authors:  Dimitris Voudouris; Eli Brenner; Willemijn D Schot; Jeroen B J Smeets
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-09-07       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 10.  Sensorimotor control of contact force.

Authors:  John F Soechting; Martha Flanders
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2008-12-08       Impact factor: 6.627

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.