Literature DB >> 25070086

The influence of target object shape on maximum grip aperture in human grasping movements.

Rebekka Verheij1, Eli Brenner, Jeroen B J Smeets.   

Abstract

The shape of a target object could influence maximum grip aperture in human grasping movements in several different ways. Maximum grip aperture could be influenced by the required precision of digit placement, by the aim to avoid colliding with the wrong parts of the target objects, by the mass of the target objects, or by (mis)judging the width or the volume of the target objects. To examine the influence of these five factors, we asked subjects to grasp five differently shaped target objects with the same maximal width, height and depth and compared their maximum grip aperture with what one would expect for each of the five factors. The five target objects, a cube, a three-dimensional plus sign, a rectangular block, a cylinder and a sphere, were all grasped with the same final grip aperture. The experimentally observed maximum grip apertures correlated poorly with the maximum grip apertures that were expected on the basis of the required precision, the actual mass, the perceived width and the perceived volume. They correlated much better with the maximum grip apertures that were expected on the basis of avoiding unintended collisions with the target object. We propose that the influence of target object shape on maximum grip aperture might primarily be the result of the need to avoid colliding with the wrong parts of the target object.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25070086     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-014-4046-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  23 in total

Review 1.  A new view on grasping.

Authors:  J B Smeets; E Brenner
Journal:  Motor Control       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 1.422

2.  Grasp size and accuracy of approach in reaching.

Authors:  A M Wing; A Turton; C Fraser
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 1.328

3.  Factors affecting higher-order movement planning: a kinematic analysis of human prehension.

Authors:  L S Jakobson; M A Goodale
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Robust movement segmentation by combining multiple sources of information.

Authors:  Willemijn D Schot; Eli Brenner; Jeroen B J Smeets
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2010-01-21       Impact factor: 2.390

5.  Effects of object shape on the visual guidance of action.

Authors:  Owino Eloka; Volker H Franz
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-02-12       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  The effect of pictorial illusion on prehension and perception.

Authors:  A M Haffenden; M A Goodale
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Differential effect of task conditions on errors of direction and extent of reaching movements.

Authors:  J Messier; J F Kalaska
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  The influence of object height on maximum grip aperture in empirical and modeled data.

Authors:  Svenja Borchers; Rebekka Verheij; Jeroen B J Smeets; Marc Himmelbach
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2014-01-13       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Discovering affordances that determine the spatial structure of reach-to-grasp movements.

Authors:  Mark Mon-Williams; Geoffrey P Bingham
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Size-contrast illusions deceive the eye but not the hand.

Authors:  S Aglioti; J F DeSouza; M A Goodale
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  1995-06-01       Impact factor: 10.834

View more
  5 in total

1.  Gaze-grasp coordination in obstacle avoidance: differences between binocular and monocular viewing.

Authors:  Simon Grant
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-08-23       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  On-line visual control of grasping movements.

Authors:  Robert Volcic; Fulvio Domini
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Grasping occluded targets: investigating the influence of target visibility, allocentric cue presence, and direction of motion on gaze and grasp accuracy.

Authors:  Ryan W Langridge; Jonathan J Marotta
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-06-09       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Some binocular advantages for planning reach, but not grasp, components of prehension.

Authors:  Simon Grant; Miriam L Conway
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-03-08       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Why some size illusions affect grip aperture.

Authors:  Jeroen B J Smeets; Erik Kleijn; Marlijn van der Meijden; Eli Brenner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2020-03-17       Impact factor: 1.972

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.