Literature DB >> 17069787

The pop out of scene-relative object movement against retinal motion due to self-movement.

Simon K Rushton1, Mark F Bradshaw, Paul A Warren.   

Abstract

An object that moves is spotted almost effortlessly; it "pops out". When the observer is stationary, a moving object is uniquely identified by retinal motion. This is not so when the observer is also moving; as the eye travels through space all scene objects change position relative to the eye producing a complicated field of retinal motion. Without the unique identifier of retinal motion an object moving relative to the scene should be difficult to locate. Using a search task, we investigated this proposition. Computer-rendered objects were moved and transformed in a manner consistent with movement of the observer. Despite the complex pattern of retinal motion, objects moving relative to the scene were found to pop out. We suggest the brain uses its sensitivity to optic flow to "stabilise" the scene, allowing the scene-relative movement of an object to be identified.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17069787     DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2006.09.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  24 in total

1.  Computational assessment of visual search strategies in volumetric medical images.

Authors:  Gezheng Wen; Avigael Aizenman; Trafton Drew; Jeremy M Wolfe; Tamara Miner Haygood; Mia K Markey
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2016-01-06

2.  Humans perceive object motion in world coordinates during obstacle avoidance.

Authors:  Brett R Fajen; Melissa S Parade; Jonathan S Matthis
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Camouflage, detection and identification of moving targets.

Authors:  Joanna R Hall; Innes C Cuthill; Roland Baddeley; Adam J Shohet; Nicholas E Scott-Samuel
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  A simple approach to ignoring irrelevant variables by population decoding based on multisensory neurons.

Authors:  HyungGoo R Kim; Xaq Pitkow; Dora E Angelaki; Gregory C DeAngelis
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 5.  The neural basis of depth perception from motion parallax.

Authors:  HyungGoo R Kim; Dora E Angelaki; Gregory C DeAngelis
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-06-19       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Neural activity underlying the detection of an object movement by an observer during forward self-motion: Dynamic decoding and temporal evolution of directional cortical connectivity.

Authors:  N Kozhemiako; A S Nunes; A Samal; K D Rana; F J Calabro; M S Hämäläinen; S Khan; L M Vaina
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2020-05-22       Impact factor: 11.685

7.  In the corner of the eye: camouflaging motion in the peripheral visual field.

Authors:  Ioan E Smart; Innes C Cuthill; Nicholas E Scott-Samuel
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-01-15       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Direct perception of action-scaled affordances: the shrinking gap problem.

Authors:  Brett R Fajen; Jonathan S Matthis
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Does optic flow parsing depend on prior estimation of heading?

Authors:  Paul A Warren; Simon K Rushton; Andrew J Foulkes
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-10-11       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Acoustic facilitation of object movement detection during self-motion.

Authors:  F J Calabro; S Soto-Faraco; L M Vaina
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-02-09       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.