Literature DB >> 31937225

In the corner of the eye: camouflaging motion in the peripheral visual field.

Ioan E Smart1, Innes C Cuthill1, Nicholas E Scott-Samuel2.   

Abstract

Most animals need to move, and motion will generally break camouflage. In many instances, most of the visual field of a predator does not fall within a high-resolution area of the retina and so, when an undetected prey moves, that motion will often be in peripheral vision. We investigate how this can be exploited by prey, through different patterns of movement, to reduce the accuracy with which the predator can locate a cryptic prey item when it subsequently orients towards a target. The same logic applies for a prey species trying to localize a predatory threat. Using human participants as surrogate predators, tasked with localizing a target on peripherally viewed computer screens, we quantify the effects of movement (duration and speed) and target pattern. We show that, while motion is certainly detrimental to camouflage, should movement be necessary, some behaviours and surface patterns reduce that cost. Our data indicate that the phenotype that minimizes localization accuracy is unpatterned, having the mean luminance of the background, does not use a startle display prior to movement, and has short (below saccadic latency), fast movements.

Entities:  

Keywords:  defensive coloration; motion camouflage; peripheral vision; position perception; visual search

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31937225      PMCID: PMC7003460          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2019.2537

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  36 in total

1.  Eye preference within the context of binocular functions.

Authors:  Walter H Ehrenstein; Birgit E Arnold-Schulz-Gahmen; Wolfgang Jaschinski
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-04-19       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Natural image statistics and efficient coding.

Authors:  B A Olshausen; D J Field
Journal:  Network       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 1.273

Review 3.  Visual attention: the past 25 years.

Authors:  Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-04-28       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Deimatic displays.

Authors:  Kate D L Umbers; Jussi Lehtonen; Johanna Mappes
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2015-01-19       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 5.  Unravelling the illusion of flicker fusion.

Authors:  Diana Umeton; Jenny C A Read; Candy Rowe
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 3.703

6.  Motion Extrapolation for Eye Movements Predicts Perceived Motion-Induced Position Shifts.

Authors:  Elle van Heusden; Martin Rolfs; Patrick Cavanagh; Hinze Hogendoorn
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-08-13       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Camouflage, detection and identification of moving targets.

Authors:  Joanna R Hall; Innes C Cuthill; Roland Baddeley; Adam J Shohet; Nicholas E Scott-Samuel
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 8.  Saccadic suppression: a review and an analysis.

Authors:  E Matin
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1974-12       Impact factor: 17.737

9.  Interactions between background matching and motion during visual detection can explain why cryptic animals keep still.

Authors:  Christos C Ioannou; Jens Krause
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2009-01-20       Impact factor: 3.703

10.  Motion dazzle and the effects of target patterning on capture success.

Authors:  Anna E Hughes; Jolyon Troscianko; Martin Stevens
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2014-09-13       Impact factor: 3.260

View more
  3 in total

1.  In the corner of the eye: camouflaging motion in the peripheral visual field.

Authors:  Ioan E Smart; Innes C Cuthill; Nicholas E Scott-Samuel
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-01-15       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Motion: enhancing signals and concealing cues.

Authors:  Eunice J Tan; Mark A Elgar
Journal:  Biol Open       Date:  2021-08-20       Impact factor: 2.422

Review 3.  Modelling Neurological Diseases in Large Animals: Criteria for Model Selection and Clinical Assessment.

Authors:  Samantha L Eaton; Fraser Murdoch; Nina M Rzechorzek; Gerard Thompson; Claudia Hartley; Benjamin Thomas Blacklock; Chris Proudfoot; Simon G Lillico; Peter Tennant; Adrian Ritchie; James Nixon; Paul M Brennan; Stefano Guido; Nadia L Mitchell; David N Palmer; C Bruce A Whitelaw; Jonathan D Cooper; Thomas M Wishart
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2022-08-25       Impact factor: 7.666

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.