Literature DB >> 17065453

Auditory brainstem timing predicts cerebral asymmetry for speech.

Daniel A Abrams1, Trent Nicol, Steven G Zecker, Nina Kraus.   

Abstract

The left hemisphere of the human cerebral cortex is dominant for processing rapid acoustic stimuli, including speech, and this specialized activity is preceded by processing in the auditory brainstem. It is not known to what extent the integrity of brainstem encoding of speech impacts patterns of asymmetry at cortex. Here, we demonstrate that the precision of temporal encoding of speech in auditory brainstem predicts cerebral asymmetry for speech sounds measured in a group of children spanning a range of language skills. Results provide strong evidence that timing deficits measured at the auditory brainstem negatively impact rapid acoustic processing by specialized structures of cortex, and demonstrate a delicate relationship between cortical activation patterns and the temporal integrity of cortical input.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17065453      PMCID: PMC6674666          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2744-06.2006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  32 in total

1.  Early unilateral cochlear implantation promotes mature cortical asymmetries in adolescents who are deaf.

Authors:  Salima Jiwani; Blake C Papsin; Karen A Gordon
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Right-hemisphere auditory cortex is dominant for coding syllable patterns in speech.

Authors:  Daniel A Abrams; Trent Nicol; Steven Zecker; Nina Kraus
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-04-09       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Relationships between behavior, brainstem and cortical encoding of seen and heard speech in musicians and non-musicians.

Authors:  Gabriella Musacchia; Dana Strait; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2008-05-17       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Hemispheric differences in processing of vocalizations depend on early experience.

Authors:  Mimi L Phan; David S Vicario
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-01-19       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  A dynamic auditory-cognitive system supports speech-in-noise perception in older adults.

Authors:  Samira Anderson; Travis White-Schwoch; Alexandra Parbery-Clark; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Reading and subcortical auditory function.

Authors:  Karen Banai; Jane Hornickel; Erika Skoe; Trent Nicol; Steven Zecker; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2009-03-17       Impact factor: 5.357

7.  Emotion modulates early auditory response to speech.

Authors:  Jade Wang; Trent Nicol; Erika Skoe; Mikko Sams; Nina Kraus
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Unstable representation of sound: a biological marker of dyslexia.

Authors:  Jane Hornickel; Nina Kraus
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Subcortical differentiation of stop consonants relates to reading and speech-in-noise perception.

Authors:  Jane Hornickel; Erika Skoe; Trent Nicol; Steven Zecker; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-07-17       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Altered neuronal response during rapid auditory processing and its relation to phonological processing in prereading children at familial risk for dyslexia.

Authors:  Nora M Raschle; Patrice L Stering; Sarah N Meissner; Nadine Gaab
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 5.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.