Literature DB >> 17060754

Is it safe to delay appendectomy in adults with acute appendicitis?

Michael F Ditillo1, James D Dziura, Reuven Rabinovici.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine whether delayed surgical intervention in adult patients with acute appendicitis is safe by correlating the interval from onset of symptoms to operation (total interval) with the degree of pathology and incidence of postoperative complications. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Prompt appendectomy has long been the standard of care for acute appendicitis because of the risk of progression to advanced pathology. This time-honored practice has been recently challenged by studies in pediatric patients, which suggested that acute appendicitis can be managed in an elective manner once antibiotic therapy is initiated. No such data are available in adult patients with acute appendicitis.
METHODS: A retrospective review of 1081 patients who underwent an appendectomy for acute appendicitis between 1998 and 2004 was conducted. The following parameters were monitored and correlated: demographics, time from onset of symptoms to arrival at the emergency room (patient interval) and from arrival to the emergency room to the operating room (hospital interval), physical, computed tomography (CT scan) and pathologic findings, complications, length of stay, and length of antibiotic treatment. Pathologic state was graded 1 (G1) for acute appendicitis, 2 (G2) for gangrenous acute appendicitis, 3 (G3) for perforation or phlegmon, and 4 (G4) for a periappendicular abscess.
RESULTS: The risk of advanced pathology, defined as a higher pathology grade, increased with the total interval. When this interval was <12 hours, the risk of developing G1, G2, G3, and G4, was 94%, 0%, 3%, and 3%, respectively. These values changed to 60%, 7%, 27%, and 6%, respectively, when the total interval was 48 to 71 hours and to 54%, 7%, 26%, and 13% for longer than 71 hours. The odds for progressive pathology was 13 times higher for the total interval >71 hours group compared with total interval<12 hours (95% confidence interval = 4.7-37.1). Although both prolonged patient and hospital intervals were associated with advanced pathology, prehospital delays were more profoundly related to worsening pathology compared with in-hospital delays (P < 0.001). Advanced pathology was associated with tenderness to palpation beyond the right lower quadrant (P < 0.001), guarding (P < 0.001), rebound (P < 0.001), and CT scan findings of peritoneal fluid (P = 0.01), fecalith (P = 0.01), dilation of the appendix (P < 0.001), and perforation (P < 0.001). Increased length of hospital stay (P < 0.001) and antibiotic treatment (P < 0.001) as well as postoperative complications (P < 0.001) also correlated with progressive pathology.
CONCLUSION: In adult patients with acute appendicitis, the risk of developing advanced pathology and postoperative complications increases with time; therefore, delayed appendectomy is unsafe. As delays in seeking medical help are difficult to control, prompt appendectomy is mandatory. Because these conclusions are derived from retrospective data, a prospective study is required to confirm their validity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17060754      PMCID: PMC1856602          DOI: 10.1097/01.sla.0000231726.53487.dd

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  11 in total

1.  Acute appendicitis: the continuing role for active observation.

Authors:  P Bachoo; A A Mahomed; G K Ninan; G G Youngson
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 1.827

2.  Is it necessary to perform appendicectomy in the middle of the night in children?

Authors:  R Surana; F Quinn; P Puri
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-05-01

3.  Interpretation of computed tomography does not correlate with laboratory or pathologic findings in surgically confirmed acute appendicitis.

Authors:  M J Weyant; S R Eachempati; M A Maluccio; D E Rivadeneira; S R Grobmyer; L J Hydo; P S Barie
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.982

4.  Does this patient have appendicitis?

Authors:  J M Wagner; W P McKinney; J L Carpenter
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1996-11-20       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Delay of surgery in acute appendicitis.

Authors:  S Eldar; E Nash; E Sabo; I Matter; J Kunin; J G Mogilner; J Abrahamson
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 2.565

6.  Effect of computed tomography of the appendix on treatment of patients and use of hospital resources.

Authors:  P M Rao; J T Rhea; R A Novelline; A A Mostafavi; C J McCabe
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1998-01-15       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  The natural history of appendicitis in adults. A prospective study.

Authors:  C L Temple; S A Huchcroft; W J Temple
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Delay in surgery for acute appendicitis.

Authors:  Nanda K Maroju; S Robinson Smile; Sarath C Sistla; Raghavan Narasimhan; Ajit Sahai
Journal:  ANZ J Surg       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 1.872

9.  Delayed versus immediate surgery in acute appendicitis: do we need to operate during the night?

Authors:  Dani Yardeni; Ronald B Hirschl; Robert A Drongowski; Daniel H Teitelbaum; James D Geiger; Arnold G Coran
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.545

10.  The most useful findings for diagnosing acute appendicitis on contrast-enhanced helical CT.

Authors:  D Choi; H Park; Y R Lee; S-H Kook; S K Kim; H J Kwag; E C Chung
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 1.701

View more
  81 in total

1.  Laparoscopic appendectomy outcomes on the weekend and during the week are no different: a national study of 151,774 patients.

Authors:  Mathias Worni; Truls Østbye; Mihir Gandhi; Dimple Rajgor; Jatin Shah; Anand Shah; Ricardo Pietrobon; Danny O Jacobs; Ulrich Guller
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Appendicitis 2006.

Authors:  Stephen R T Evans
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  72 h Is the Time Critical Point to Operate in Acute Appendicitis.

Authors:  Mohammed Elniel; Jennie Grainger; Edward J Nevins; Nikhil Misra; Paul Skaife
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Accuracy of Ultrasonography in Diagnosing Acute Appendicitis.

Authors:  Parisa Javidi Parsijani; Nima Pourhabibi Zarandi; Shahram Paydar; Hamid Reza Abbasi; Shahram Bolandparvaz
Journal:  Bull Emerg Trauma       Date:  2013-10

5.  [Appendicitis in the elderly. CRP value as decision support for diagnostic laparoscopy].

Authors:  D Sülberg; A M Chromik; S Kersting; K Meurer; A Tannapfel; W Uhl; U Mittelkötter
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 0.955

6.  In-hospital delay increases the risk of perforation in adults with appendicitis.

Authors:  Mirjam Busch; Florian S Gutzwiller; Sonja Aellig; Rolf Kuettel; Urs Metzger; Urs Zingg
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Can platelet indices be used as predictors of complication in subjects with appendicitis?

Authors:  Bahadır Ceylan; Turan Aslan; Ahmet Çınar; Ayşe Ruhkar Kurt; Yasemin Akkoyunlu
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 1.704

8.  Appendicectomies performed >48 hours after admission to a dedicated acute general surgical unit.

Authors:  B March; D Gillies; J Gani
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 1.891

9.  Laparoscopic appendicectomy is superior to open surgery for complicated appendicitis.

Authors:  Gaik S Quah; Guy D Eslick; Michael R Cox
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-03-13       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Alteration in emergency theatre prioritisation does not alter outcome for acute appendicitis: comparative cohort study.

Authors:  Stefano Partelli; Sabina Beg; Juliette Brown; Soumil Vyas; Hemant M Kocher
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2009-06-08       Impact factor: 5.469

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.