Literature DB >> 25350186

Appendicectomies performed >48 hours after admission to a dedicated acute general surgical unit.

B March1, D Gillies, J Gani.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Acute general surgical units (AGSUs) are changing the way in which acute appendicitis is managed. In the AGSU at John Hunter Hospital, some patients wait more than 48 hours from admission to undergo an appendicectomy, usually because they are not unwell enough to precipitate an operation before that time. We analysed this subgroup of appendicectomy patients to determine how effectively they are being managed and how this might be improved.
METHODS: A retrospective review of prospectively collected data was conducted of all patients who received an appendicectomy while admitted under the AGSU at John Hunter Hospital in the five years between January 2009 and December 2013.
RESULTS: A total of 1,039 appendicectomies were performed in the study period, with 81 patients (7.8%) waiting >48 hours for their operation (delayed appendicectomy group). Overall, the negative appendicectomy (NA) rate was 21.6%; the NA rate in delayed appendicectomies was 50.62% and a non-therapeutic operation occurred in 47% of this group (n=38). No significant difference was found in the incidence of perforation/gangrenous appendicitis between patients having surgery in <48 hours and the delayed appendicectomy groups (11.2% vs 9.9%, p=0.85). A combination of negative diagnostic imaging result, a normal white cell count and normal C-reactive protein (ie a negative 'triple test') was the best predictor of a negative appendicectomy (p=0.0158, negative predictive value: 0.91, 95% confidence interval: 0.59-0.99), in the delayed appendicectomy group.
CONCLUSIONS: In the delayed appendicectomy group, the incidence of perforation/gangrenous appendicitis was not significantly different from that found in patients having appendicectomy performed sooner. However, the NA and non-therapeutic operation rates were unacceptably high. An appendix triple test can improve diagnostic accuracy significantly without an unacceptable rise in the rates of perforation/gangrenous appendicitis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25350186      PMCID: PMC4474105          DOI: 10.1308/003588414X14055925058832

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl        ISSN: 0035-8843            Impact factor:   1.891


  13 in total

Review 1.  Safety of short, in-hospital delays before surgery for acute appendicitis: multicentre cohort study, systematic review, and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Aneel Bhangu
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Is it safe to delay appendectomy in adults with acute appendicitis?

Authors:  Michael F Ditillo; James D Dziura; Reuven Rabinovici
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a prospective randomized double-blind study.

Authors:  Namir Katkhouda; Rodney J Mason; Shirin Towfigh; Anna Gevorgyan; Rahila Essani
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Is it necessary to perform appendicectomy in the middle of the night in children?

Authors:  R Surana; F Quinn; P Puri
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-05-01

5.  Prompt or delayed appendectomy? Influence of timing of surgery for acute appendicitis.

Authors:  Giorgio Giraudo; Filippo Baracchi; Luca Pellegrino; Herbert M Dal Corso; Felice Borghi
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2012-08-30       Impact factor: 2.549

6.  Randomised controlled trial of ultrasonography in diagnosis of acute appendicitis, incorporating the Alvarado score.

Authors:  C D Douglas; N E Macpherson; P M Davidson; J S Gani
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-10-14

Review 7.  If not appendicitis, then what else can it be? A retrospective review of 1492 appendectomies.

Authors:  K W Ma; N H Chia; H W Yeung; M T Cheung
Journal:  Hong Kong Med J       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.227

8.  The clinical and economic correlates of misdiagnosed appendicitis: nationwide analysis.

Authors:  David R Flum; Thomas Koepsell
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2002-07

Review 9.  Meta-analysis of the clinical and laboratory diagnosis of appendicitis.

Authors:  R E B Andersson
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 6.939

10.  Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey.

Authors:  Daniel Dindo; Nicolas Demartines; Pierre-Alain Clavien
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  2 in total

1.  Risk factors for morbidity after appendectomy.

Authors:  Anne Andert; H P Alizai; C D Klink; N Neitzke; C Fitzner; C Heidenhain; A Kroh; U P Neumann; M Binnebösel
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 2.  Meta-analysis of in-hospital delay before surgery as a risk factor for complications in patients with acute appendicitis.

Authors:  S T van Dijk; A H van Dijk; M G Dijkgraaf; M A Boermeester
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 6.939

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.