Literature DB >> 14616200

The most useful findings for diagnosing acute appendicitis on contrast-enhanced helical CT.

D Choi1, H Park, Y R Lee, S-H Kook, S K Kim, H J Kwag, E C Chung.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the most useful findings to look for in diagnosing acute appendicitis on contrast-enhanced helical CT.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Appendiceal helical CT scans with intravenous contrast administration (abdomen, 7-mm collimation; abdominopelvic junction, 5-mm collimation) of 71 patients with surgically proven acute appendicitis and 167 patients with alternative diagnoses were reviewed retrospectively. Three radiologists analyzed the following parameters: enlarged appendix (>6 mm in diameter), appendiceal wall thickening, appendiceal wall enhancement, no identification of the appendix, appendicolith(s), appendiceal intraluminal air, intramural air, extraluminal air, periappendiceal fat stranding, extraluminal fluid, phlegmon, abscess, lymphadenopathy, segmental terminal ileal wall thickening, focal cecal apical thickening, focal colonic wall thickening, and segmental colonic wall thickening. The features that best distinguished appendicitis from alternative diagnoses were selected with stepwise logistic regression analysis.
RESULTS: Nine CT findings distinguished acute appendicitis from alternative diagnoses (P < 0.05): enlarged appendix (R = 0.739), appendiceal wall thickening (R = 0.525), periappendiceal fat stranding (R = 0.414), appendiceal wall enhancement (R = 0.404), focal cecal apical thickening (R = 0.171), appendicolith(s) (R = 0.157), extraluminal air (R = 0.050), intramural air (R = 0.043), and phlegmon (R = 0.030). Enlarged appendix (sensitivity, 93%; specificity, 92%), appendiceal wall thickening (sensitivity, 66%; specificity, 96%), periappendiceal fat stranding (sensitivity, 87%; specificity, 74%), and appendiceal wall enhancement (sensitivity, 75%; specificity, 85%) showed the statistically most significant association with acute appendicitis.
CONCLUSION: On 5-mm-section contrast-enhanced helical CT examinations, enlarged appendix, appendiceal wall thickening, periappendiceal fat stranding, and appendiceal wall enhancement were the most useful findings for diagnosing acute appendicitis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14616200     DOI: 10.1080/02841850312331287819

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Radiol        ISSN: 0284-1851            Impact factor:   1.701


  30 in total

1.  Rapid CT diagnosis of acute appendicitis with IV contrast material.

Authors:  Sandra Mun; Randy D Ernst; Kevin Chen; Aytekin Oto; Shree Shah; William J Mileski
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2005-12-17

2.  A novel reporting system to improve accuracy in appendicitis imaging.

Authors:  Benjamin D Godwin; Frederick T Drake; Vlad V Simianu; Jabi E Shriki; Daniel S Hippe; Manjiri Dighe; Sarah Bastawrous; Carlos Cuevas; David Flum; Puneet Bhargava
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  [Acute intestinal inflammation].

Authors:  M Hittinger; M F Reiser; C J Zech
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 0.635

4.  Predictors of appendicitis on computed tomography among cases with borderline appendix size.

Authors:  Atalie C Thompson; Eric W Olcott; Peter D Poullos; R Brooke Jeffrey; Matthew O Thompson; Jarrett Rosenberg; Lewis K Shin
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2015-02-17

5.  Intravenous contrast-enhanced computed tomography in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.

Authors:  Naoko Iwahashi; Yoshimi Kitagawa; Toshihiko Mayumi; Hiroshi Kohno
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Noncontrast and contrast enhanced computed tomography for diagnosing acute appendicitis: A retrospective study for the usefulness.

Authors:  Maki Kitagawa; Tatsuya Kotani; Yuji Miyamoto; Yoshiaki Kuriu; Hideaki Tsurudome; Hiroshi Nishi; Masaharu Yabe; Eigo Otsuji
Journal:  J Radiol Case Rep       Date:  2009-06-01

7.  MRI features associated with acute appendicitis.

Authors:  Marjolein M N Leeuwenburgh; Sebastiaan Jensch; Jan W C Gratama; Aart Spilt; Bart M Wiarda; H Wouter Van Es; Lodewijk P J Cobben; Patrick M M Bossuyt; Marja A Boermeester; Jaap Stoker
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-09-08       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  The Reliability of a Standardized Reporting System for the Diagnosis of Appendicitis.

Authors:  Vlad V Simianu; Anna Shamitoff; Daniel S Hippe; Benjamin D Godwin; Jabi E Shriki; Frederick T Drake; Ryan B O'Malley; Suresh Maximin; Sarah Bastawrous; Mariam Moshiri; Jean H Lee; Carlos Cuevas; Manjiri Dighe; David Flum; Puneet Bhargava
Journal:  Curr Probl Diagn Radiol       Date:  2016-08-02

9.  Atypical appendicitis: diagnostic value of volume-rendered reconstructions obtained with 16-slice multidetector-row CT.

Authors:  A A Stabile Ianora; M Moschetta; V Lorusso; A Scardapane
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2009-09-22       Impact factor: 3.469

10.  The equivocal appendix at CT: prevalence in a control population.

Authors:  Emily M Webb; Zhen J Wang; Fergus V Coakley; Liina Poder; Antonio C Westphalen; Benjamin M Yeh
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2009-07-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.