Literature DB >> 17037262

Adaptive dose selection using efficacy-toxicity trade-offs: illustrations and practical considerations.

Peter F Thall1, John D Cook, Elihu H Estey.   

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to describe and illustrate an outcome-adaptive Bayesian procedure, proposed by Thall and Cook (2004), for assigning doses of an experimental treatment to successive cohorts of patients. The method uses elicited (efficacy, toxicity) probability pairs to construct a family of trade-off contours that are used to quantify the desirability of each dose. This provides a basis for determining a best dose for each cohort. The method combines the goals of conventional Phase I and Phase II trials, and thus may be called a "Phase I-II" design. We first give a general review of the probability model and dose-finding algorithm. We next describe an application to a trial of a biologic agent for treatment of acute myelogenous leukemia, including a computer simulation study to assess the design's average behavior. To illustrate how the method may work in practice, we present a cohort-by-cohort example of a particular trial. We close with a discussion of some practical issues that may arise during implementation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17037262     DOI: 10.1080/10543400600860394

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biopharm Stat        ISSN: 1054-3406            Impact factor:   1.051


  19 in total

Review 1.  The changing landscape of phase I trials in oncology.

Authors:  Kit Man Wong; Anna Capasso; S Gail Eckhardt
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-11-10       Impact factor: 66.675

2.  Some Geometric Methods for Constructing Decision Criteria Based On Two-Dimensional Parameters.

Authors:  Peter F Thall
Journal:  J Stat Plan Inference       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.111

3.  Cyclosporine modulation of multidrug resistance in combination with pravastatin, mitoxantrone and etoposide for adult patients with relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia: a phase 1/2 study.

Authors:  Tara L Chen; Elihu H Estey; Megan Othus; Kelda M Gardner; Lauren J Markle; Roland B Walter
Journal:  Leuk Lymphoma       Date:  2013-03-27

4.  A phase I study of fludarabine, cytarabine, and oxaliplatin therapy in patients with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Apostolia Maria Tsimberidou; Michael J Keating; Elias J Jabbour; Farhad Ravandi-Kashani; Susan O'Brien; Elihu Estey; Neby Bekele; William K Plunkett; Hagop Kantarjian; Gautam Borthakur
Journal:  Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk       Date:  2014-02-03

5.  A bargaining approach for resolving the tradeoff between beneficial and harmful drug responses.

Authors:  Andrey Garnaev; Wade Trappe
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 2.259

6.  Inotuzumab ozogamicin in adults with relapsed or refractory CD22-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a phase 1/2 study.

Authors:  Daniel J DeAngelo; Wendy Stock; Anthony S Stein; Andrei Shustov; Michaela Liedtke; Charles A Schiffer; Erik Vandendries; Katherine Liau; Revathi Ananthakrishnan; Joseph Boni; A Douglas Laird; Luke Fostvedt; Hagop M Kantarjian; Anjali S Advani
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2017-06-27

7.  Bayesian Models and Decision Algorithms for Complex Early Phase Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Peter F Thall
Journal:  Stat Sci       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.901

8.  An adaptive dose-finding design based on both safety and immunologic responses in cancer clinical trials.

Authors:  Cody Chiuzan; Elizabeth Garrett-Mayer; Michael Nishimura
Journal:  Stat Biopharm Res       Date:  2018-04-30       Impact factor: 1.452

9.  Using Outcomes to Analyze Patients Rather than Patients to Analyze Outcomes: A Step toward Pragmatism in Benefit:risk Evaluation.

Authors:  Scott R Evans; Dean Follmann
Journal:  Stat Biopharm Res       Date:  2016-12-06       Impact factor: 1.452

10.  Effective sample size for computing prior hyperparameters in Bayesian phase I-II dose-finding.

Authors:  Peter F Thall; Richard C Herrick; Hoang Q Nguyen; John J Venier; J Clift Norris
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2014-09-01       Impact factor: 2.486

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.