Apostolia Maria Tsimberidou1, Michael J Keating2, Elias J Jabbour2, Farhad Ravandi-Kashani2, Susan O'Brien2, Elihu Estey3, Neby Bekele4, William K Plunkett5, Hagop Kantarjian2, Gautam Borthakur2. 1. Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, Phase I Clinical Trials Program, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX. Electronic address: atsimber@mdanderson.org. 2. Division of Cancer Medicine, Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX. 3. Division of Hematology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA. 4. Gilead Sciences, Foster City, CA. 5. Department of Experimental Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The combination of cytarabine and fludarabine was associated with superior clinical outcomes compared with those of high-dose cytarabine in relapse acute myeloid leukemia (AML). We conducted a phase I study combining oxaliplatin with cytarabine and fludarabine therapy for patients with relapsed or refractory AML. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 2008 and November 2009, 27 patients were registered in the study. Patients had histologically confirmed disease, performance status 0 to 2, and adequate organ function. The treatment regimen consisted of increasing doses of oxaliplatin (25, 30, or 35 mg/m(2)/d) on days 1 to 4 (escalation phase), and fludarabine (30 mg/m²) and cytarabine (500 mg/m²) on days 2 to 6, every 28 days for ≤ 6 cycles. The dose-limiting toxicity was defined as any symptomatic grade ≥ 3 nonhematologic toxicity lasting ≥ 3 days and involving a major organ system. RESULTS: Of 27 patients, 12 were treated in the dose-escalation phase and 15 at the maximum tolerated dose for oxaliplatin (30 mg/m²; expansion phase). All patients were evaluable for toxicity and response. Only 1 patient received the second cycle; the remaining patients received no further study treatment, owing to slow recovery from toxicities or physician decision. Grade 3-4 drug-related toxicities included diarrhea (grade 4) and elevated levels of bilirubin (grade 3) and aspartate transaminase (grade 3). In all, 3 patients had a complete remission and 2 patients complete response without platelet recovery. CONCLUSION: Oxaliplatin, cytarabine, and fludarabine therapy had antileukemic activity in patients with poor-risk AML, but it was associated with toxicity. Different schedules and doses may be better tolerated.
PURPOSE: The combination of cytarabine and fludarabine was associated with superior clinical outcomes compared with those of high-dose cytarabine in relapse acute myeloid leukemia (AML). We conducted a phase I study combining oxaliplatin with cytarabine and fludarabine therapy for patients with relapsed or refractory AML. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 2008 and November 2009, 27 patients were registered in the study. Patients had histologically confirmed disease, performance status 0 to 2, and adequate organ function. The treatment regimen consisted of increasing doses of oxaliplatin (25, 30, or 35 mg/m(2)/d) on days 1 to 4 (escalation phase), and fludarabine (30 mg/m²) and cytarabine (500 mg/m²) on days 2 to 6, every 28 days for ≤ 6 cycles. The dose-limiting toxicity was defined as any symptomatic grade ≥ 3 nonhematologic toxicity lasting ≥ 3 days and involving a major organ system. RESULTS: Of 27 patients, 12 were treated in the dose-escalation phase and 15 at the maximum tolerated dose for oxaliplatin (30 mg/m²; expansion phase). All patients were evaluable for toxicity and response. Only 1 patient received the second cycle; the remaining patients received no further study treatment, owing to slow recovery from toxicities or physician decision. Grade 3-4 drug-related toxicities included diarrhea (grade 4) and elevated levels of bilirubin (grade 3) and aspartate transaminase (grade 3). In all, 3 patients had a complete remission and 2 patients complete response without platelet recovery. CONCLUSION:Oxaliplatin, cytarabine, and fludarabine therapy had antileukemic activity in patients with poor-risk AML, but it was associated with toxicity. Different schedules and doses may be better tolerated.
Authors: Pamela S Becker; Hagop M Kantarjian; Frederick R Appelbaum; Barry Storer; Sherry Pierce; Jianqin Shan; Stephan Faderl; Elihu H Estey Journal: Haematologica Date: 2012-07-16 Impact factor: 9.941
Authors: G Mathé; Y Kidani; M Segiguchi; M Eriguchi; G Fredj; G Peytavin; J L Misset; S Brienza; F de Vassals; E Chenu Journal: Biomed Pharmacother Date: 1989 Impact factor: 6.529
Authors: Francis J Giles; Armand Keating; Anthony H Goldstone; Irit Avivi; Cheryl L Willman; Hagop M Kantarjian Journal: Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program Date: 2002