Literature DB >> 19710059

Sperm competitiveness in frogs: slow and steady wins the race.

Martin A Dziminski1, J Dale Roberts, Maxine Beveridge, Leigh W Simmons.   

Abstract

When sperm compete to fertilize available ova, selection is expected to favour ejaculate traits that contribute to a male's fertilization success. While there is much evidence to show that selection favours increased numbers of sperm, only a handful of empirical studies have examined how variation in sperm form and function contributes to competitive fertilization success. Here, we examine selection acting on sperm form and function in the externally fertilizing myobatrachid frog, Crinia georgiana. Using in vitro fertilization techniques and controlling for variation in the number of sperm contributed by males in competitive situations, we show that males with a greater proportion of motile sperm, and motile sperm with slower swimming velocities, have an advantage when competing for fertilizations. Sperm morphology and the degree of genetic similarity between putative sires and the female had no influence on competitive fertilization success. These unusual patterns of selection might explain why frog sperm typically exhibit relatively slow swimming speeds and sustained longevity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19710059      PMCID: PMC2825793          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2009.1334

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  36 in total

1.  Sperm mobility determines the outcome of sperm competition in the domestic fowl.

Authors:  T R Birkhead; J G Martínez; T Burke; D P Froman
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1999-09-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Sperm viability and sperm competition in insects.

Authors:  F M Hunter; T R Birkhead
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2002-01-22       Impact factor: 10.834

3.  Does multiple paternity improve fitness of the frog Crinia georgiana?

Authors:  P G Byrne; J D Roberts
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  Sperm competition and the evolution of gamete morphology in frogs.

Authors:  Phillip G Byrne; Leigh W Simmons; J Dale Roberts
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-10-07       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Nontransitivity of paternity in a bird.

Authors:  T R Birkhead; N Chaline; J D Biggins; T Burke; T Pizzari
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.694

6.  Estimating the probability of identity among genotypes in natural populations: cautions and guidelines.

Authors:  L P Waits; G Luikart; P Taberlet
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 6.185

7.  Sperm-female coevolution in Drosophila.

Authors:  Gary T Miller; Scott Pitnick
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-11-08       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Experimental evidence for the evolution of numerous, tiny sperm via sperm competition.

Authors:  Matthew J G Gage; Edward H Morrow
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2003-04-29       Impact factor: 10.834

9.  Spermatozoal traits and sperm competition in Atlantic salmon: relative sperm velocity is the primary determinant of fertilization success.

Authors:  Matthew J G Gage; Christopher P Macfarlane; Sarah Yeates; Richard G Ward; Jeremy B Searle; Geoffrey A Parker
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2004-01-06       Impact factor: 10.834

10.  Effect of sperm concentration, medium osmolality and oocyte storage on artificial fertilisation success in a myobatrachid frog (Limnodynastes tasmaniensis).

Authors:  D L Edwards; M J Mahony; J Clulow
Journal:  Reprod Fertil Dev       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.311

View more
  13 in total

1.  Female mediation of competitive fertilization success in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Stefan Lüpold; Scott Pitnick; Kirstin S Berben; Cecilia S Blengini; John M Belote; Mollie K Manier
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-06-11       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Failed sperm development as a reproductive isolating barrier between species.

Authors:  Lisa K Wünsch; Karin S Pfennig
Journal:  Evol Dev       Date:  2013 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.930

3.  Extensive geographical variation in testes size and ejaculate traits in a terrestrial-breeding frog.

Authors:  Tabitha S Rudin-Bitterli; Nicola J Mitchell; Jonathan P Evans
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2020-09-30       Impact factor: 3.703

4.  Low pitched voices are perceived as masculine and attractive but do they predict semen quality in men?

Authors:  Leigh W Simmons; Marianne Peters; Gillian Rhodes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-12-21       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Sperm morphology, adenosine triphosphate (ATP) concentration and swimming velocity: unexpected relationships in a passerine bird.

Authors:  Clair Bennison; Nicola Hemmings; Lola Brookes; Jon Slate; Tim Birkhead
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Post-meiotic intra-testicular sperm senescence in a wild vertebrate.

Authors:  Attila Hettyey; Balázs Vági; Dustin J Penn; Herbert Hoi; Richard H Wagner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-03       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Evolution of sperm morphology in anurans: insights into the roles of mating system and spawning location.

Authors:  Yu Zeng; Shang Ling Lou; Wen Bo Liao; Robert Jehle
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 3.260

8.  Proteomic analysis of chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) ovarian fluid.

Authors:  Sheri L Johnson; Marsha Villarroel; Patrice Rosengrave; Alan Carne; Torsten Kleffmann; P Mark Lokman; Neil J Gemmell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-04       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Extensive variation in sperm morphology in a frog with no sperm competition.

Authors:  Kathryn A Stewart; Rachel Wang; Robert Montgomerie
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 3.260

10.  Fluorescent sperm offer a method for tracking the real-time success of ejaculates when they compete to fertilise eggs.

Authors:  Rowan A Lymbery; W Jason Kennington; Jonathan P Evans
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-03-04       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.