Literature DB >> 19129124

Cryptic preference for MHC-dissimilar females in male red junglefowl, Gallus gallus.

Mark A F Gillingham1, David S Richardson, Hanne Løvlie, Anna Moynihan, Kirsty Worley, Tom Pizzari.   

Abstract

An increasing number of studies test the idea that females increase offspring fitness by biasing fertilization in favour of genetically compatible partners; however, few have investigated or controlled for corresponding preferences in males. Here, we experimentally test whether male red junglefowl, Gallus gallus, prefer genetically compatible females, measured by similarity at the major histocompatibility complex (MHC), a key gene complex in vertebrate immune function. Theory predicts that because some degree of MHC heterozygosity favours viability, individuals should prefer partners that carry MHC alleles different from their own. While male fowl showed no preference when simultaneously presented with an MHC-similar and an MHC-dissimilar female, they showed a 'cryptic' preference, by allocating more sperm to the most MHC-dissimilar of two sequentially presented females. These results provide the first experimental evidence that males might respond to the MHC similarity of a female through differential ejaculate expenditure. By revealing that cryptic male behaviours may bias fertilization success in favour of genetically compatible partners, this study demonstrates the need to experimentally disentangle male and female effects when studying preferences for genetically compatible partners.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19129124      PMCID: PMC2679071          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2008.1549

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  69 in total

1.  Male mounting alone reduces female promiscuity in the fowl.

Authors:  Hanne Løvlie; Charles K Cornwallis; Tommaso Pizzari
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2005-07-12       Impact factor: 10.834

2.  The evolution of infidelity in socially monogamous passerines: neglected components of direct and indirect selection.

Authors:  Simon C Griffith
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2007-01-11       Impact factor: 3.926

3.  Can non-directional male mating preferences facilitate honest female ornamentation?

Authors:  Stephen F Chenoweth; Paul Doughty; Hanna Kokko
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 9.492

4.  Social status and availability of females determine patterns of sperm allocation in the fowl.

Authors:  Charlie K Cornwallis; Tim R Birkhead
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  Peptide motifs of the single dominantly expressed class I molecule explain the striking MHC-determined response to Rous sarcoma virus in chickens.

Authors:  Hans-Joachim Wallny; David Avila; Lawrence G Hunt; Timothy J Powell; Patricia Riegert; Jan Salomonsen; Karsten Skjødt; Olli Vainio; Francis Vilbois; Michael V Wiles; Jim Kaufman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-01-23       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Experimental evidence that female ornamentation increases the acquisition of sperm and signals fecundity.

Authors:  Charlie K Cornwallis; Tim R Birkhead
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-02-22       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Body odour preferences in men and women: do they aim for specific MHC combinations or simply heterozygosity?

Authors:  C Wedekind; S Füri
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1997-10-22       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Genetic dissimilarity predicts paternity in the smooth newt (Lissotriton vulgaris).

Authors:  Robert Jehle; Marc Sztatecsny; Jochen B W Wolf; April Whitlock; Walter Hödl; Terry Burke
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2007-10-22       Impact factor: 3.703

9.  The genetic architecture of a female sexual ornament.

Authors:  Dominic Wright; Susanne Kerje; Helena Brändström; Karin Schütz; Andreas Kindmark; Leif Andersson; Per Jensen; Tommaso Pizzari
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2007-12-05       Impact factor: 3.694

View more
  22 in total

1.  The best smellers make the best choosers: mate choice is affected by female chemosensory receptor gene diversity in a mammal.

Authors:  Pablo S C Santos; Maja Mezger; Miriam Kolar; Frank-Uwe Michler; Simone Sommer
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-12-19       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Female mediation of competitive fertilization success in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Stefan Lüpold; Scott Pitnick; Kirstin S Berben; Cecilia S Blengini; John M Belote; Mollie K Manier
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-06-11       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Mate choice and sexual selection: what have we learned since Darwin?

Authors:  Adam G Jones; Nicholas L Ratterman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-06-15       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Self/nonself perception, reproduction and the extended MHC.

Authors:  Andreas Ziegler; Pablo Sandro Carvalho Santos; Thomas Kellermann; Barbara Uchanska-Ziegler
Journal:  Self Nonself       Date:  2010-06-21

5.  Cryptic female preference for genetically unrelated males is mediated by ovarian fluid in the guppy.

Authors:  Clelia Gasparini; Andrea Pilastro
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Characterization of MHC class I and II genes in a subantarctic seabird, the blue petrel, Halobaena caerulea (Procellariiformes).

Authors:  Maria Strandh; Mimi Lannefors; Francesco Bonadonna; Helena Westerdahl
Journal:  Immunogenetics       Date:  2011-05-24       Impact factor: 2.846

Review 7.  The perfume of reproduction in birds: chemosignaling in avian social life.

Authors:  Samuel P Caro; Jacques Balthazart; Francesco Bonadonna
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 3.587

8.  Chemically moderated gamete preferences predict offspring fitness in a broadcast spawning invertebrate.

Authors:  Mathew Oliver; Jonathan P Evans
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  MHC signaling during social communication.

Authors:  James S Ruff; Adam C Nelson; Jason L Kubinak; Wayne K Potts
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 2.622

10.  MHC class I variation in a natural blue tit population (Cyanistes caeruleus).

Authors:  R Wutzler; K Foerster; B Kempenaers
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 1.082

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.