Literature DB >> 17965906

Evaluation of the patient positioning during DXA measurements in daily clinical practice.

Alp Cetin1, Erkan Ozgüçlü, Levent Ozçakar, Ayşen Akinci.   

Abstract

For prompt diagnosis of osteoporosis, properly instructed dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) measurements are required. To get correct DXA results in addition to quality control procedures, proper positioning of specific body regions such as hip and spine should also be achieved. The aim of this study was to assess the accurateness of the patient positioning for hip and spine regions in daily clinical practice. Hip and spine scan images of 113 DXA reports were evaluated for whether or not the patient was positioned correctly. Out of 113 hip and spine DXA reports, 61 hips and 94 spines were found to have scan images with improper positions. The spine was not straight in 48.7% of the images. The 38.9% of the spinal images did not comprise both iliac crests, and 40.7% did not include T12 and L5 vertebrae. In hip DXA reports, 40.7% of the femoral shaft was deviated to one side. We found the ratio of invalid positions surprisingly very high. Although this may stem from local technical problems and may not reflect the overall quality of scans in other centers, such misinterpretations would definitely affect clinicians' decisions in an inappropriate way. We suggest that relevant inconveniences should be kept in mind both by the clinicians and the technical staff for better production and prompt estimation of DXA measurements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17965906     DOI: 10.1007/s10067-007-0773-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Rheumatol        ISSN: 0770-3198            Impact factor:   2.980


  10 in total

Review 1.  [Medical treatment of osteoporosis].

Authors:  Daisuke Inoue; Toshio Matsumoto
Journal:  Nihon Rinsho       Date:  2006-09

2.  [Diagnosis of osteoporosis in the elderly; an overview.].

Authors:  G Sigurðsson
Journal:  Laeknabladid       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 0.548

Review 3.  [Absorptiometry].

Authors:  S Prevrhal
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 4.  A systematic review and economic evaluation of alendronate, etidronate, risedronate, raloxifene and teriparatide for the prevention and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Authors:  M Stevenson; M Lloyd Jones; E De Nigris; N Brewer; S Davis; J Oakley
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.014

Review 5.  Clinical applications of bone density testing for osteoporosis.

Authors:  E M Lewiecki
Journal:  Minerva Med       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.806

6.  DXA quality matters.

Authors:  E Michael Lewiecki; Neil Binkley; Steven M Petak
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2006 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.617

Review 7.  Fundamentals and pitfalls of bone densitometry using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA).

Authors:  Nelson B Watts
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-08-21       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Official positions of the international society for clinical densitometry.

Authors:  E Michael Lewiecki; Nelson B Watts; Michael R McClung; Steven M Petak; Laura K Bachrach; John A Shepherd; Robert W Downs
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 5.958

Review 9.  Bone densitometry: applications and limitations.

Authors:  Zeba Syed; Aliya Khan
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Can       Date:  2002-06

Review 10.  Position statement : executive summary. The Writing Group for the International Society for Clinical Densitometry (ISCD) Position Development Conference.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.963

  10 in total
  4 in total

1.  The fracture predictive ability of lumbar spine BMD and TBS as calculated based on different combinations of the lumbar spine vertebrae.

Authors:  Enisa Shevroja; François Mo Costabella; Elena Gonzalez Rodriguez; Olivier Lamy; Didier Hans
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 2.879

2.  Effects of clinical reanalysis in dual energy X-ray absorptiometry reports.

Authors:  Filiz Tuna; Selçuk Yavuz; Derya Demirbağ Demirbağ Kabayel; Ali Sarıkaya
Journal:  Turk J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2017-05-16

3.  Fracture risk assessment after BMD examination: whose job is it, anyway?

Authors:  S Allin; S Munce; L Carlin; D Butt; K Tu; G Hawker; J Sale; S Jaglal
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-03-08       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  BatchBMD as an Efficient and Accurate Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry Report Generator.

Authors:  Chun-Hsiang Chan; Wen-Chi Huang; Yi-Chien Lu; Hsing-Fen Hsiao; Wing P Chan
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-20
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.