Literature DB >> 17021776

Normative data for the "Sniffin' Sticks" including tests of odor identification, odor discrimination, and olfactory thresholds: an upgrade based on a group of more than 3,000 subjects.

T Hummel1, G Kobal, H Gudziol, A Mackay-Sim.   

Abstract

"Sniffin' Sticks" is a test of nasal chemosensory function that is based on pen-like odor dispensing devices, introduced some 10 years ago by Kobal and co-workers. It consists of tests for odor threshold, discrimination, and identification. Previous work established its test-retest reliability and validity. Results of the test are presented as "TDI score", the sum of results obtained for threshold, discrimination, and identification measures. While normative data have been established they are based on a relatively small number of subjects, especially with regard to subjects older than 55 years where data from only 30 healthy subjects have been used. The present study aimed to remedy this situation. Now data are available from 3,282 subjects as compared to data from 738 subjects published previously. Disregarding sex-related differences, the TDI score at the tenth percentile was 24.9 in subjects younger than 15 years, 30.3 for ages from 16 to 35 years, 27.3 for ages from 36 to 55 years, and 19.6 for subjects older than 55 years. Because the tenth percentile has been defined to separate hyposmia from normosmia, these data can be used as a guide to estimate individual olfactory ability in relation to subject's age. Absolute hyposmia was defined as the tenth percentile score of 16-35 year old subjects. Other than previous reports the present norms are also sex-differentiated with women outperforming men in the three olfactory tests. Further, the present data suggest specific changes of individual olfactory functions in relation to age, with odor thresholds declining most dramatically compared to odor discrimination and odor identification.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17021776     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-006-0173-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  34 in total

1.  Evaluation of olfactory dysfunction in the Connecticut Chemosensory Clinical Research Center.

Authors:  W S Cain; J F Gent; R B Goodspeed; G Leonard
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 3.325

2.  Chemosensory event-related potentials change with age.

Authors:  T Hummel; S Barz; E Pauli; G Kobal
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1998-03

3.  "Sniffin' sticks": screening of olfactory performance.

Authors:  G Kobal; T Hummel; B Sekinger; S Barz; S Roscher; S Wolf
Journal:  Rhinology       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 3.681

4.  Prevalence of olfactory impairment in older adults.

Authors:  Claire Murphy; Carla R Schubert; Karen J Cruickshanks; Barbara E K Klein; Ronald Klein; David M Nondahl
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-11-13       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Sex differences in recollective experience for olfactory and verbal information.

Authors:  Maria Larsson; Martin Lövdén; Lars-Göran Nilsson
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2003-01

6.  Selectivity and response characteristics of human olfactory neurons.

Authors:  N E Rawson; G Gomez; B Cowart; J G Brand; L D Lowry; E A Pribitkin; D Restrepo
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Multicenter investigation of 1,036 subjects using a standardized method for the assessment of olfactory function combining tests of odor identification, odor discrimination, and olfactory thresholds.

Authors:  G Kobal; L Klimek; M Wolfensberger; H Gudziol; A Temmel; C M Owen; H Seeber; E Pauli; T Hummel
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.503

8.  Sex differentiated responses to intranasal trigeminal stimuli.

Authors:  Johan N Lundström; Johannes Frasnelli; Maria Larsson; Thomas Hummel
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2005-03-31       Impact factor: 2.997

9.  Olfactory identification deficits in patients with focal cerebral excision.

Authors:  M Jones-Gotman; R J Zatorre
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 3.139

10.  Demographic and cognitive predictors of cued odor identification: evidence from a population-based study.

Authors:  Maria Larsson; Lars-Göran Nilsson; Jonas K Olofsson; Steven Nordin
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 3.160

View more
  367 in total

Review 1.  Premotor Diagnosis of Parkinson's Disease.

Authors:  Heinz Reichmann
Journal:  Neurosci Bull       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 5.203

2.  Olfactory function in Wave 2 of the National Social Life, Health, and Aging Project.

Authors:  David W Kern; Kristen E Wroblewski; L Philip Schumm; Jayant M Pinto; Rachel C Chen; Martha K McClintock
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 4.077

3.  The olfactory function is impaired in patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies.

Authors:  L Iaccarino; N Shoenfeld; M Rampudda; M Zen; M Gatto; A Ghirardello; N Bassi; L Punzi; Y Shoenfeld; A Doria
Journal:  Immunol Res       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 2.829

4.  Age-associated loss of selectivity in human olfactory sensory neurons.

Authors:  Nancy E Rawson; George Gomez; Beverly J Cowart; Andres Kriete; Edmund Pribitkin; Diego Restrepo
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 4.673

5.  [Treatment of olfactory disorders].

Authors:  T Hummel; B A Stuck
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.284

6.  Gustatory dysfunction after mandibular zoster.

Authors:  Frédéric Heymans; Jean-Silvain Lacroix; Andrej Terzic; Basile Nicolas Landis
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 3.307

7.  Understanding the relationship between olfactory-specific quality of life, objective olfactory loss, and patient factors in chronic rhinosinusitis.

Authors:  Jose L Mattos; Rodney J Schlosser; Kristina A Storck; Zachary M Soler
Journal:  Int Forum Allergy Rhinol       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 3.858

8.  Effects of oral Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol on the cerebral processing of olfactory input in healthy non-addicted subjects.

Authors:  Carmen Walter; Bruno G Oertel; Lisa Felden; Ulrike Nöth; Johannes Vermehren; Ralf Deichmann; Jörn Lötsch
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2017-09-02       Impact factor: 2.953

9.  Effects of 20 mg oral Δ(9) -tetrahydrocannabinol on the olfactory function of healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Carmen Walter; Bruno G Oertel; Dagmar Ludyga; Alfred Ultsch; Thomas Hummel; Jörn Lötsch
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 4.335

10.  Intranasal vitamin A is beneficial in post-infectious olfactory loss.

Authors:  Thomas Hummel; Katherine L Whitcroft; Gina Rueter; Antje Haehner
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-04-22       Impact factor: 2.503

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.