David W Kern1, Kristen E Wroblewski2, L Philip Schumm2, Jayant M Pinto3, Rachel C Chen4, Martha K McClintock5. 1. Department of Comparative Human Development, Institute for Mind and Biology, dkern@uchicago.edu. 2. Department of Health Studies. 3. Section of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery. 4. Pritzker School of Medicine, and. 5. Department of Comparative Human Development, Institute for Mind and Biology, Department of Psychology, University of Chicago, Illinois.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the sense of smell, including sensitivity and odor identification, and characterize the U.S. national prevalence of olfactory dysfunction in older adults, thereby facilitating further investigation of the substantial risks for older adults associated with this basic sensory ability. METHOD: The sense of smell was evaluated using the Olfactory Function Field Exam (OFFE), a measure designed specifically for field research, which assesses 3 components of olfaction: sensitivity to n-butanol (a standard testing odorant) and androstadienone (AND, a key social odor produced by humans), as well as the ability to identify odors. Respondents were randomly selected from the National Social Life, Health, and Aging Project Wave 2 sample to receive the OFFE (n = 2,304), and 2,212 consented to participate. RESULTS: In the U.S. population aged 62-90, n-butanol detection ability was significantly worse at older ages (ordinal logistic regression, p < .001); however, there was no difference in detection ability between genders (p = .60). AND detection ability was also significantly worse at older ages (p = .003), but in contrast to n-butanol, women outperformed men (p = .001). As expected, odor identification ability was worse in older people than in younger (p < .001), and women were more accurate than men (p = .001). DISCUSSION: We report for the first time 3 facets of olfactory function and its association with age and gender in a representative sample of U.S. older adults. Future analyses of these data are needed to elucidate the sense of smell's role in physical, social, and mental health with aging.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the sense of smell, including sensitivity and odor identification, and characterize the U.S. national prevalence of olfactory dysfunction in older adults, thereby facilitating further investigation of the substantial risks for older adults associated with this basic sensory ability. METHOD: The sense of smell was evaluated using the Olfactory Function Field Exam (OFFE), a measure designed specifically for field research, which assesses 3 components of olfaction: sensitivity to n-butanol (a standard testing odorant) and androstadienone (AND, a key social odor produced by humans), as well as the ability to identify odors. Respondents were randomly selected from the National Social Life, Health, and Aging Project Wave 2 sample to receive the OFFE (n = 2,304), and 2,212 consented to participate. RESULTS: In the U.S. population aged 62-90, n-butanol detection ability was significantly worse at older ages (ordinal logistic regression, p < .001); however, there was no difference in detection ability between genders (p = .60). AND detection ability was also significantly worse at older ages (p = .003), but in contrast to n-butanol, women outperformed men (p = .001). As expected, odor identification ability was worse in older people than in younger (p < .001), and women were more accurate than men (p = .001). DISCUSSION: We report for the first time 3 facets of olfactory function and its association with age and gender in a representative sample of U.S. older adults. Future analyses of these data are needed to elucidate the sense of smell's role in physical, social, and mental health with aging.
Authors: L Philip Schumm; Martha McClintock; Sharon Williams; Sara Leitsch; Johan Lundstrom; Thomas Hummel; Stacy Tessler Lindau Journal: J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci Date: 2009-06-23 Impact factor: 4.077
Authors: Claire Murphy; Carla R Schubert; Karen J Cruickshanks; Barbara E K Klein; Ronald Klein; David M Nondahl Journal: JAMA Date: 2002-11-13 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Jens Reden; Antje Mueller; Christian Mueller; Iordanis Konstantinidis; Johannes Frasnelli; Basile N Landis; Thomas Hummel Journal: Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2006-03
Authors: Jesse K Siegel; Kristen E Wroblewski; Martha K McClintock; Jayant M Pinto Journal: Int Forum Allergy Rhinol Date: 2019-07-31 Impact factor: 3.858
Authors: Katie O'Doherty; Angela Jaszczak; Joscelyn N Hoffmann; Hannah M You; David W Kern; Kristina Pagel; Jane McPhillips; L Philip Schumm; William Dale; Elbert S Huang; Martha K McClintock Journal: J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci Date: 2014-11 Impact factor: 4.077
Authors: Eli P Darnell; Kristen E Wroblewski; Kristina L Pagel; David W Kern; Martha K McClintock; Jayant M Pinto Journal: Chem Senses Date: 2020-05-29 Impact factor: 3.160
Authors: Carla R Schubert; Mary E Fischer; A Alex Pinto; Barbara E K Klein; Ronald Klein; Karen J Cruickshanks Journal: Laryngoscope Date: 2016-12-21 Impact factor: 3.325
Authors: V Eloesa McSorley; Jayant Pinto; L Philip Schumm; Kristen Wroblewski; David Kern; Martha McClintock; Diane S Lauderdale Journal: Neuroepidemiology Date: 2017-07-26 Impact factor: 3.282