Literature DB >> 17013594

The impact of the dosage of intravenous gadolinium-chelates on the vascular signal intensity in MR angiography.

Johannes T Heverhagen1, Isabelle Reitz, Martina Pavlicova, Andrea L Levine, Klaus J Klose, Hans-Joachim Wagner.   

Abstract

To show the effects of different concentrations of contrast agent on signal time curves and image contrast of abdominal aorta, vena cava and portal vein in comparison to each other as well as liver and spleen. Imaging was carried out in a 1.0 Tesla clinical scanner. Sixty patients were prospectively included and divided into three contrast agent (Gd-DTPA) dosage groups (0.1 mmol/kg, 0.2 mmol/kg and 0.3 mmol/kg). All patients were scanned using a time-resolved 3D FLASH sequence (58 phases) with a 3.75 second acquisition time per phase. Signal time curves and image contrast levels were evaluated. No significant differences were found for the maximum signal enhancement between the groups in the investigated vessels. Image masking, the subtraction of the baseline images, resulted in a substantial improvement in image contrast. However, statistically significant differences between the contrast agent dosage groups could only be found for vena cava and liver. Vessel conspicuity is not significantly improved with an increase of contrast agent dose. However, an increase in contrast agent dosage increases vessel contrast. Our findings suggest that a single dose single station investigation seems to be sufficient for high quality abdominal MRA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17013594     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-006-0419-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  19 in total

1.  Image artifacts due to a time-varying contrast medium concentration in 3D contrast-enhanced MRA.

Authors:  J Svensson; J S Petersson; F Ståhlberg; E M Larsson; P Leander; L E Olsson
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  3D MR DSA: effects of injection protocol and image masking.

Authors:  R Frayne; T M Grist; J S Swan; D C Peters; F R Korosec; C A Mistretta
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  Contrast-enhanced carotid MR angiography. Imaging principles and physics.

Authors:  T K Foo; V B Ho; P L Choyke
Journal:  Neuroimaging Clin N Am       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 2.264

4.  In vitro evaluation of a mechanical injector for infusion of magnetic resonance contrast media.

Authors:  S Saini; C J Fretz; C R Fisel; B R Rosen; J Ferrucci
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 6.016

Review 5.  Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of peripheral vessels. Different contrast agent applications and sequence strategies: a review.

Authors:  M Boos; M Lentschig; K Scheffler; G M Bongartz; W Steinbrich
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 6.016

6.  Breath-hold single-dose gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional MR aortography: usefulness of a timing examination and MR power injector.

Authors:  J P Earls; N M Rofsky; D R DeCorato; G A Krinsky; J C Weinreb
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Breath-hold gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography of the abdominal aorta and its major branches.

Authors:  M R Prince; D L Narasimham; J C Stanley; T L Chenevert; D M Williams; M V Marx; K J Cho
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 8.  Arterial complications of pancreatitis and their radiological management.

Authors:  V Sawlani; R V Phadke; S S Baijal; S Kumar; S Roy; P Gupta; R B Gujral
Journal:  Australas Radiol       Date:  1996-11

Review 9.  Contemporary imaging techniques for the diagnosis of renal artery stenosis.

Authors:  T Leiner; M W de Haan; P J Nelemans; J M A van Engelshoven; G B C Vasbinder
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-06-28       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 10.  Screening for renovascular hypertension.

Authors:  N R Dunnick; G N Sfakianakis
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 2.303

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  [Image postprocessing of aortic CTA and MRA].

Authors:  H von Tengg-Kobligk; T F Weber; F Rengier; D Böckler; H Schumacher; H-U Kauczor
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 0.635

2.  Dose comparison of single versus double dose in contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of the renal arteries: intra-individual cross-over blinded trial using Gd-DTPA.

Authors:  J T Heverhagen; C L Wright; P Schmalbrock; M V Knopp
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-07-25       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Assessment of the kidneys: magnetic resonance angiography, perfusion and diffusion.

Authors:  Ulrike I Attenberger; John N Morelli; Stefan O Schoenberg; Henrik J Michaely
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 5.364

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.