Literature DB >> 18654783

Dose comparison of single versus double dose in contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of the renal arteries: intra-individual cross-over blinded trial using Gd-DTPA.

J T Heverhagen1, C L Wright, P Schmalbrock, M V Knopp.   

Abstract

This study was planned as an open-label, single-centre trial with blinded evaluations by two independent radiologists, aimed at the intra-individual comparison of single-dose and double-dose Gd-DTPA-enhanced MRA in the renal arterial territory. Ten healthy volunteers were included in the study. Renal MRAs were carried out on a clinical 1.5-T MR system using a body phased-array coil. Images were acquired with three-dimensional fast spoiled gradient echo sequence. Contrast agent was injected with a power injector keeping the injection time constant for single dose and double dose. Both readers found at least 96% of vascular segments evaluable. Median overall image quality was rated excellent, and diagnostic confidence was rated confident. No statistically significant difference between the dosage groups could be demonstrated. Signal intensity, SNR and CNR were significantly higher for the double-dose group. Our results demonstrate that while a double dose of contrast agent increases SNR, it does not lead to further improvement in visual and perceptual image quality. A single dosage of approximately 0.1 mmol/kg bw Gd-DTPA may be the preferable dosage to demonstrate the renal arteries.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18654783     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-008-1120-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  14 in total

1.  3D MR DSA: effects of injection protocol and image masking.

Authors:  R Frayne; T M Grist; J S Swan; D C Peters; F R Korosec; C A Mistretta
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  Cost analysis of procedures related to the management of renal artery stenosis from various perspectives.

Authors:  Debby van Helvoort-Postulart; Carmen D Dirksen; Abraham A Kroon; Patricia J Nelemans; Peter W de Leeuw; Alfons G H Kessels; Jos M A van Engelshoven; M G Myriam Hunink
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-07-05       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Arteriographic complications in the DSA era.

Authors:  J R Waugh; N Sacharias
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  The impact of the dosage of intravenous gadolinium-chelates on the vascular signal intensity in MR angiography.

Authors:  Johannes T Heverhagen; Isabelle Reitz; Martina Pavlicova; Andrea L Levine; Klaus J Klose; Hans-Joachim Wagner
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-09-30       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Noise measurement and estimation in MR imaging experiments.

Authors:  Johannes T Heverhagen
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Kinetic evaluation of an i.v. bolus of MR contrast media.

Authors:  J T Heverhagen; R C Funck; U Schwarz; P Zoefel; V Matschl; K J Klose; H J Wagner
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.546

7.  Trends in adverse events after IV administration of contrast media.

Authors:  S T Cochran; K Bomyea; J W Sayre
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 8.  MRA of the abdominal aorta and lower extremities.

Authors:  T M Grist
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 9.  Contemporary imaging techniques for the diagnosis of renal artery stenosis.

Authors:  T Leiner; M W de Haan; P J Nelemans; J M A van Engelshoven; G B C Vasbinder
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-06-28       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  MR angiography and dynamic flow evaluation of the portal venous system.

Authors:  R R Edelman; B Zhao; C Liu; K U Wentz; H P Mattle; J P Finn; C McArdle
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 3.959

View more
  3 in total

1.  Assessment of the kidneys: magnetic resonance angiography, perfusion and diffusion.

Authors:  Ulrike I Attenberger; John N Morelli; Stefan O Schoenberg; Henrik J Michaely
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 5.364

2.  Performance of single-use syringe versus multi-use MR contrast injectors: a prospective comparative study.

Authors:  F Struik; J J Futterer; W M Prokop
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-03-03       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Part 2 - Coronary angiography with gadofosveset trisodium: a prospective intra-subject comparison for dose optimization for 100 % efficiency imaging.

Authors:  Mark A Ahlman; Fabio S Raman; Jianing Pang; Filip Zemrak; Veit Sandfort; Scott R Penzak; Zhaoyang Fan; Songtao Liu; Debiao Li; David A Bluemke
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 2.298

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.