Literature DB >> 17011897

Improving operating room efficiency through process redesign.

Maureen Harders1, Mark A Malangoni, Steven Weight, Tejbir Sidhu.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Operating rooms (ORs) are important resources for patient care and revenue, yet a significant portion of OR time is taken up by nonoperative activities. We hypothesized that redesigning the process that occurs between operations would lead to a decrease in nonoperative time (NOT = room turnover time plus anesthesia induction and emergence time).
METHODS: Following a 3-month multidisciplinary planning process, a prospective study to reduce NOT was initiated in 2 of 17 ORs at a tertiary care academic medical center. Unlike previous reports, which have limited the number of participants, we constructed a process that was restricted only by case duration. The plan focused on minimizing nonoperative tasks in the OR, effecting parallel performance of activities, and reducing nonclinical disruptions. Eligible cases were those with an estimated operative time of 2 hours or less. A target NOT of 35 minutes was established. Cases of similar duration in the remaining ORs served as a concurrent control group.
RESULTS: Twenty-three surgeons, 13 anesthesiologists, and 11 nurses worked in the project ORs over a 3-month period. Residents participated in all cases. There was a significant reduction in NOT (42.2 +/- 12.9 vs 65 +/- 21.7 minutes), turnover time (26.4 +/- 11.2 vs 42.8 +/- 21.7 minutes), and anesthesia-related time (16.9 vs 21.9 minutes, all P < .001) in the project rooms compared with cases of similar duration in control ORs. Process-related delays were identified in 70% of cases when NOT exceeded the 35-minute target.
CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate that a coordinated multidisciplinary process redesign can significantly reduce NOT. This process is applicable to most ORs and has optimal benefit for cases of 2 hours or less in duration. The high percentage of residual process-related delays suggests that further improvements can be anticipated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17011897     DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2006.06.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surgery        ISSN: 0039-6060            Impact factor:   3.982


  31 in total

1.  Presence of anesthesia resident trainees in day surgery unit has mixed effects on operating room efficiency measures.

Authors:  Richard D Urman; Pankaj Sarin; Aya Mitani; Beverly Philip; Sunil Eappen
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2012

2.  Delays in the operating room: signs of an imperfect system.

Authors:  Janice Wong; Kathleen Joy Khu; Zul Kaderali; Mark Bernstein
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.089

3.  What is the best workflow for an operating room? A simulation study of five scenarios.

Authors:  Riitta A Marjamaa; Paulus M Torkki; Eero J Hirvensalo; Olli A Kirvelä
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2009-06

4.  Operating room metrics score card-creating a prototype for individualized feedback.

Authors:  Rodney A Gabriel; Robert Gimlich; Jesse M Ehrenfeld; Richard D Urman
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 4.460

5.  Preparatory Time-Related Hand Surgery Operating Room Inefficiency: A Systems Analysis.

Authors:  Michael T Milone; Heero Hacquebord; Louis W Catalano; Steven Z Glickel; Jacques H Hacquebord
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2019-02-27

6.  Effect of the Implementation of a New Electronic Health Record System on Surgical Case Turnover Time.

Authors:  Joseph McDowell; Albert Wu; Jesse M Ehrenfeld; Richard D Urman
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2017-01-27       Impact factor: 4.460

7.  Accuracy of patient's turnover time prediction using RFID technology in an academic ambulatory surgery center.

Authors:  Florence Marchand-Maillet; Claire Debes; Fanny Garnier; Nicolas Dufeu; Didier Sciard; Marc Beaussier
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2015-01-31       Impact factor: 4.460

8.  Elimination of waste: creation of a successful Lean colonoscopy program at an academic medical center.

Authors:  Aneel Damle; Nathan Andrew; Shubjeet Kaur; Alan Orquiola; Karim Alavi; Scott R Steele; Justin Maykel
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Low-Cost Haptic Simulation Using Material Fracture.

Authors:  David F Pepley; Hong-En Chen; Yichun Tang; Sanjib Das Adhikary; Scarlett R Miller; Jason Z Moore
Journal:  IEEE Trans Haptics       Date:  2019-05-02       Impact factor: 2.487

10.  Developing a pathway for high-value, patient-centered total joint arthroplasty.

Authors:  Aricca D Van Citters; Cheryl Fahlman; Donald A Goldmann; Jay R Lieberman; Karl M Koenig; Anthony M DiGioia; Beth O'Donnell; John Martin; Frank A Federico; Richard A Bankowitz; Eugene C Nelson; Kevin J Bozic
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.