BACKGROUND: Three competing goals at academic medical centers are to increase efficiency, to optimize clinical care, and to train residents. The goal of this project was to compare day surgery operating room (OR) efficiency measures for anesthesiologists working alone, working with residents, and working with certified nurse anesthetists in a tertiary multisubspecialty teaching hospital to determine if trainees significantly impact OR efficiency. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated operating room times data for 2,427 day surgery cases, comparing first case on-time starts, anesthesia-controlled times, induction times, emergence times, and turnover times for the 3 anesthesiologist groups. RESULTS: Compared to the solo anesthesiologist group, anesthesiologists working with residents had significantly longer induction, emergence, and total anesthesia-controlled times (20.2 ± 8.0 vs 18.4 ± 7.0 minutes). However, the anesthesiologists working with residents had more on-time starts (65% vs 53%) and lower turnover times 47.3 ± 13.6 vs 50.8 ± 14.5 minutes) than the solo anesthesiologist group. CONCLUSION: The pairing of anesthesiology residents with anesthesia staff has mixed effects on OR efficiency measures in a day surgery unit.
BACKGROUND: Three competing goals at academic medical centers are to increase efficiency, to optimize clinical care, and to train residents. The goal of this project was to compare day surgery operating room (OR) efficiency measures for anesthesiologists working alone, working with residents, and working with certified nurse anesthetists in a tertiary multisubspecialty teaching hospital to determine if trainees significantly impact OR efficiency. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated operating room times data for 2,427 day surgery cases, comparing first case on-time starts, anesthesia-controlled times, induction times, emergence times, and turnover times for the 3 anesthesiologist groups. RESULTS: Compared to the solo anesthesiologist group, anesthesiologists working with residents had significantly longer induction, emergence, and total anesthesia-controlled times (20.2 ± 8.0 vs 18.4 ± 7.0 minutes). However, the anesthesiologists working with residents had more on-time starts (65% vs 53%) and lower turnover times 47.3 ± 13.6 vs 50.8 ± 14.5 minutes) than the solo anesthesiologist group. CONCLUSION: The pairing of anesthesiology residents with anesthesia staff has mixed effects on OR efficiency measures in a day surgery unit.
Keywords:
Ambulatory anesthesia; operating room management; turnover times
Authors: Albert Wu; Joseph A Sanford; Mitchell H Tsai; Stephen E O'Donnell; Billy K Tran; Richard D Urman Journal: J Med Syst Date: 2017-07-07 Impact factor: 4.460
Authors: Bhavani Shankar Kodali; K Dennie Kim; Hugh Flanagan; Jesse M Ehrenfeld; Richard D Urman Journal: J Med Syst Date: 2014-01-28 Impact factor: 4.460
Authors: Colby G Simmons; Nicholas J Alvey; Alexander M Kaizer; Kayla Williamson; Adeel A Faruki; Rachel M Kacmar; Vesna Jevtovic-Todorovic; Nathaen S Weitzel Journal: J Med Syst Date: 2022-03-04 Impact factor: 4.920
Authors: Jan P Mulier; Liesje De Boeck; Michel Meulders; Jeroen Beliën; Jan Colpaert; Annabel Sels Journal: J Eval Clin Pract Date: 2014-12-11 Impact factor: 2.431
Authors: Shaidah Deghan Manshadi; Kooroush Dehghan; David I Robertson; Cara Reimer; Boris Zevin Journal: Can J Surg Date: 2022-01-18 Impact factor: 2.089