Literature DB >> 17006563

Electromagnetic interference in patients with implanted cardioverter-defibrillators and implantable loop recorders.

Marcos de Sousa1, Gunnar Klein, Thomas Korte, Michael Niehaus.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2002        PMID： 17006563      PMCID： PMC1564059     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J        ISSN： 0972-6292


× No keyword cloud information.
  22 in total

1.  MR imaging and cardiac pacemakers: in-vitro evaluation and in-vivo studies in 51 patients at 0.5 T.

Authors:  T Sommer; C Vahlhaus; G Lauck; A von Smekal; M Reinke; U Hofer; W Block; F Träber; C Schneider; J Gieseke; W Jung; H Schild
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Electromagnetic interference of an implantable loop recorder by commonly encountered electronic devices.

Authors:  C C de Cock; H J Spruijt; L M van Campen; A W Plu; C A Visser
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 1.976

3.  Implantable cardioverter defibrillators and cellular telephones: is there any interference?

Authors:  E Occhetta; L Plebani; M Bortnik; G Sacchetti; G Trevi
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 1.976

4.  [Could C- and D-network mobile phones endanger patients with cardiac pacemakers?].

Authors:  H J Trappe
Journal:  Dtsch Med Wochenschr       Date:  1996-05-17       Impact factor: 0.628

5.  The effect of metal detector gates on implanted permanent pacemakers.

Authors:  Y Copperman; D Zarfati; S Laniado
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 1.976

6.  Evaluation of effects of the microwave oven (915 and 2450 MHz) and radar (2810 and 3050 MHz) electromagnetic radiation on noncompetitive cardiac pacemakers.

Authors:  C H Bonney; P L Rustan; G E Ford
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1973-09       Impact factor: 4.538

7.  [Is the cardiac pacemaker patient at risk by using mobile telephone devices in D-net?].

Authors:  W Grimm
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 0.743

8.  Interactions between electronic article surveillance systems and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators.

Authors:  W J Groh; S A Boschee; E D Engelstein; W M Miles; M E Burton; P R Foster; B J Crevey; D P Zipes
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1999-07-27       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Electromagnetic interference of digital and analog cellular telephones with implantable cardioverter defibrillators: in vitro and in vivo studies.

Authors:  V Barbaro; P Bartolini; F Bellocci; F Caruso; A Donato; D Gabrielli; C Militello; A S Montenero; P Zecchi
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 1.976

10.  [Experience in dealing with artificial pacemaker patients during therapy with ionizing radiation].

Authors:  H Röthig; T Herrmann; H Kopcsek
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 3.621
View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  A Review and Analysis of Managing Commonly Seen Implanted Devices for Patients Undergoing Radiation Therapy.

Authors:  Maria F Chan; Claire Young; Daphna Gelblum; Chengyu Shi; Carolanne Rincon; Elizabeth Hipp; Jingdong Li; Dongxu Wang
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2021-08-06

2.  Interference between cellular telephones and implantable rhythm devices: a review on recent papers.

Authors:  Johnson Francis; Michael Niehaus
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2006-10-01

3.  Electromagnetic interference in implantable rhythm devices--the Indian scenario.

Authors:  Johnson Francis
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2002-07-01

4.  iPad2(R) use in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators causes electromagnetic interference: the EMIT Study.

Authors:  Teri M Kozik; Gianna Chien; Therese F Connolly; Gurinder S Grewal; David Liang; Walter Chien
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2014-04-10       Impact factor: 5.501
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.